[openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators][neutron][fwaas] Removing FWaaS V1 in Stein

All, With the Stein release we will remove support for FWaaS V1 [1]. It has been marked deprecated since Liberty (2015) and was an experimental API. It is being replaced with FWaaS V2 [2] which has been available since the Newton release. What is Neutron FWaaS? Firewall-as-a-Service is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Proposing Carlos Goncalves (cgoncalves) as an Octavia core reviewer

Concur. Carlos has been a great contributor! +1 From: Nir Magnezi Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Friday, August 31, 2018 at 5:02 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia]

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Proposing Jacky Hu (dayou) as an Octavia core reviewer

+1 Really excited to work with Jacky -- German On 3/26/18, 8:33 PM, "Michael Johnson" wrote: Hello Octavia community, I would like to propose Jacky Hu (dayou) as a core reviewer on the Octavia project. Jacky has done amazing work on Octavia

[openstack-dev] [neutron][fwaas] YouTube video demoing FWaaS V2 L2

All, With great pleasure I am sharing this link of Chandan’s excellent video showing the new L2 functionality: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBYJIZ4tUaw=youtu.be Psyched and many thanks to Chandan -- German __

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stepping down from core

Hi, Thanks for all the help and support over the years. Both LBaaS (Octavia) and FWaaS wouldn’t be what they are today without your leadership and advice – All the best + good luck, German From: "Armando M." Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

It looks like the implicit expectation is that devs also need to attend the Forums at the summit in addition to the PTG. The Forums, though important, hardly made it worthwhile for me to attend the summit (and in fact I skipped Sydney). On the other hand some devs got together and hashed out

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaasv2][agent implementation] L7 policy support

Mihaela, The first version with L7 was Newton and beginning then the LBaaS V2 namespace driver would support it as well as Octavia. German From: "mihaela.ba...@orange.com" Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Proposing Nir Magnezi as Octavia core reviewer

+1 Welcome Nir, well earned. German On 10/4/17, 4:28 PM, "Michael Johnson" wrote: Hello OpenStack folks, I would like to propose Nir Magnezi as a core reviewer on the Octavia project. He has been an active contributor to the Octavia projects for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Questions for Candidates

-What is one trait you have that makes it difficult to work in groups like the TC and how do you counteract it? I am probably overly fascinated by new technology and would be the first to re-invent the wheel. I am probably in good company with that at the TC but I have internalized the lean

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

I have read very good ideas in this thread but I somehow can’t shake the feeling that people who are quite comfortable with the irc meeting are looking for a solution for people who are not. So, before we do any changes I would send out a survey and see what the developers we are serving

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][elections]questions about one platform vision

Hi, Though I haven’t attended the operator summit in person a them which has been mentioned to me is that we need to offer better reference architectures. I use the plural here on purpose because I don’t think there will be one architecture/combination of projects which works for everybody. As

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Agreed but not only for the TC. I also heard privately from some contributors that meetings times prevent them from fully engage with a project. This is something where we as the TC can lead by example. German On 4/10/17, 3:06 PM, "Davanum Srinivas" wrote: Matt,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Hi, I am well aware that being on the TC is a serious time commitment and that there is more to do than a given day has hours. So I read your question more about prioritizing and how I would do that. A fair part of how I prioritize depends on input from others. That’s why I said listening to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaasv2] Migrate LBaaS instance

Hi Saverio, We completely understand that operators are still on older versions of OpenStack and we are executing against the OpenStack release series [1] and we adhere to the support phases as outlined in [2]. So any new features will only be added to Pike whereas bug fixes will be carried

Re: [openstack-dev] [ansible]Octavia ansible script

56 On 02/07/2017 12:00 AM, Santhosh Fernandes wrote: > Can we know the status of octavia ansible script ? > > Link :- https://blueprints.launchpad.net/~german-eichberger > <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/%7Egerman-eichberger> > > Is there any version available for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Neutron team social in Atlanta on Thursday

+1 Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2017, at 5:43 PM, Michael Johnson > wrote: +1 Thanks for setting this up, Michael From: Kevin Benton [mailto:ke...@benton.pub] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 11:19 AM To:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][FWaaS][PTG] FWaaS team gathering Thursday for lunch

All, The FWaaS team will meet for lunch at the Sheraton tomorrow, Thursday, to tlak about Pike priorities (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fwaas-pike) and prepare for Friday’s Advanced Srrvices session. Ping us on irc if you can’t find our table. German

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron-lbaas][barbican][octavia]certs don't get deregistered in barbican after lbaas listener delete

Hi, The idea was that we would like to let the user know in Barbican when the certificate is being used with LBaaS. Therefore, we added the register and de-register logic. I don’t know of any use case where a certificate needs to be deleted in Barbican when LBaaS doesn’t need it any longer.

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Nominating German Eichberger for Octavia core reviewer

ck Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)'" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Nominating German Eichberger for Octavia core reviewer With that vote we have quorum. Welcome back German! Michael From: Kosnik, Lubosz [mailto:lubosz.kos...@int

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Where will Neutron go in future?

You are correct LBaaS development has moved to the Octavia team. However, Octavia will have a way for 3rd party load balancers to plug in instead of the Octavia load balancing solution. The Octavia team is currently deciding if it should continue to support the Haproxy namespace driver as part

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 On 12/16/16, 12:35 PM, "Brandon Logan" wrote: +1! On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 00:58 +0100, Armando M. wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for > service-related patches. > > Both

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

+1 (even if I can’t vote) From: Edgar Magana Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Friday, December 16, 2016 at 12:46 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"