Please vote again: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445617/
We keep dib-utils for now until we have a plan.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Here's the proposal that will move DIB to Infra umbrella:
> https://review.openstack.org/445617
>
> Let's move forward and vote on
Here's the proposal that will move DIB to Infra umbrella:
https://review.openstack.org/445617
Let's move forward and vote on this proposal.
Thanks all,
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Gregory Haynes wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Andre Florath wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Thanks Greg for
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Andre Florath wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Thanks Greg for sharing your thoughts. The idea of splitting off DIB
> from OpenStack is new for me, therefore I collect some pros and
> cons:
>
> Stay in OpenStack:
>
> + Use available OpenStack infrastructure and methods
> +
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Andre Florath wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Thanks Greg for sharing your thoughts. The idea of splitting off DIB
> from OpenStack is new for me, therefore I collect some pros and
> cons:
>
> Stay in OpenStack:
>
> + Use available OpenStack infrastructure and methods
> + Ope
ch 04, 2017 3:02 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of
diskimage-builder
On 03/03/2017 03:25 AM, Ligong LG1 Duan wrote:
> I am wondering whether DIB can become a component of Glance, as DIB is us
Hello!
Thanks Greg for sharing your thoughts. The idea of splitting off DIB
from OpenStack is new for me, therefore I collect some pros and
cons:
Stay in OpenStack:
+ Use available OpenStack infrastructure and methods
+ OpenStack should include a possibility to create images for ironic,
VMs a
On 2017-03-03 13:27:16 -0600 (-0600), Gregory Haynes wrote:
[...]
> I hadn't heard anything to the effect of infra not wanting us, but
> AFAIK none of us has stepped up to really ask. One issue with
> infra is that, typically, OpenStack projects do not depend
> directly on infra projects. I am sure
Hello,
Thanks for bringing this back to life.
As I am sure some are aware I have been mostly absent from DIB lately,
so don't let me stop you all from going forward with this or any of the
other plans. I just wanted to do a bit of a braindump on my thought
process from a while back on why I never
On 03/03/2017 03:25 AM, Ligong LG1 Duan wrote:
I am wondering whether DIB can become a component of Glance, as DIB is used to
create OS images and Glance to upload OS images.
I see a big difference between creating images and storing them. I
can't imagine Glance would have any interest in
On 03/02/2017 03:31 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote:
From my point of view, i've been using that either on infra with
puppet-infracloud, glean.. and now with TripleO. So in my opinion, it shall
be an independent project, with core contributo
@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of
diskimage-builder
On 03/02/2017 03:31 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>> 1) Move diskimage-builder into own (big tent?) project. Setup a new
>>> PTL, etc.
> Let's move forward with this one i
Emilien Macchi writes:
> DIB folks: please confirm on this thread that you're ok to move out
> DIB from TripleO and be an independent project.
As a DIB user (and occasional contributor of patches in the past) and
TripleO non-user, I'm in favor of the separation.
> Also please decide if we want it
As user and contributor for diskimage-builder, i think that being an
independent project, and moving to the big tent, will benefit it. +1 from
my side
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 03:31 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> >>> 1) Move diskimage-builder into own (bi
On 03/02/2017 03:31 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>> 1) Move diskimage-builder into own (big tent?) project. Setup a new PTL,
>>> etc.
> Let's move forward with this one if everybody agrees on that.
>
> DIB folks: please confirm on this thread that you're ok to move out
> DIB from TripleO and be an i
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote:
> From my point of view, i've been using that either on infra with
> puppet-infracloud, glean.. and now with TripleO. So in my opinion, it shall
> be an independent project, with core contributors from both sides.
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017
>From my point of view, i've been using that either on infra with
puppet-infracloud, glean.. and now with TripleO. So in my opinion, it shall
be an independent project, with core contributors from both sides.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Paul Belanger
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 02:11:4
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 02:11:42PM -0500, James Slagle wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Paul Belanger
> > wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> With the containerization[1] of tripleo, I'd like to know more about the
> >> future of
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> With the containerization[1] of tripleo, I'd like to know more about the
>> future of
>> diskimage-builder as it relates to the tripleo project.
>>
>> Reading the r
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> With the containerization[1] of tripleo, I'd like to know more about the
> future of
> diskimage-builder as it relates to the tripleo project.
>
> Reading the recently approved spec for containers, container (image) builds
>
Greetings,
With the containerization[1] of tripleo, I'd like to know more about the future
of
diskimage-builder as it relates to the tripleo project.
Reading the recently approved spec for containers, container (image) builds are
no longer under the control of tripleo; by kolla. Where does this
20 matches
Mail list logo