Just for the record, they are watching us!:-O
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-aws-directory-service/
Best!
Thiago
On 16 August 2014 16:03, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> Hey Stackers,
>
> I'm wondering here... Samba4 is pretty solid (up coming 4.2 rocks), I'm
> using it on a daily basis as
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 07:27 +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
> Hi Thiago,
>
>
> Like for the Windows case, where we have Heat templates for AD DC and
> other MSFT related workloads (Exchange, SQL Server, SharePoint, etc)
> [1], the best place in OpenStack for Samba 4 DC is a dedicated Heat
> temp
Hi Thiago,
Like for the Windows case, where we have Heat templates for AD DC and other
MSFT related workloads (Exchange, SQL Server, SharePoint, etc) [1], the best
place in OpenStack for Samba 4 DC is a dedicated Heat template.
Heat is the de facto workload orchestration standard for OpenStack,
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 13:00 +0400, Stan Lagun wrote:
> This can be addressed by Murano only if its deployed to the cloud (on
> VM belonging to some tenant). Having it on OpenStack service layer
> integrated with major OpenStack services sounds very promising. The
> problem I see is significant over
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 13:05 +0400, Ruslan Kamaldinov wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Adam Lawson wrote:
> > Doesn't Murano address this already?
>
> Please note that Murano is no longer a windows-as-a-service or
> smth-as-a-serivce. Murano is an application catalog [1]. But you're
> abs
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Adam Lawson wrote:
> Doesn't Murano address this already?
Please note that Murano is no longer a windows-as-a-service or
smth-as-a-serivce. Murano is an application catalog [1]. But you're
absolutely right, this is a perfect use case for Murano - application
devel
This can be addressed by Murano only if its deployed to the cloud (on VM
belonging to some tenant). Having it on OpenStack service layer integrated
with major OpenStack services sounds very promising. The problem I see is
significant overlap with Keystone, especially in Kerberos and LDAP parts
Sin
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ
wrote:
> Hey Stackers,
>
> I'm wondering here... Samba4 is pretty solid (up coming 4.2 rocks), I'm
> using it on a daily basis as an AD DC controller, for both Windows and Linux
> Instances! With replication, file system ACLs - cifs, built-in LDAP
I know! :-P
On 16 August 2014 21:17, Adam Lawson wrote:
> Also, don't forget that AD != LDAP. ;)
> On Aug 16, 2014 5:16 PM, "Adam Lawson" wrote:
>
>> Doesn't Murano address this already?
>> On Aug 16, 2014 2:35 PM, "Martinx - ジェームズ"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think that it would be great too! OpenL
Also, don't forget that AD != LDAP. ;)
On Aug 16, 2014 5:16 PM, "Adam Lawson" wrote:
> Doesn't Murano address this already?
> On Aug 16, 2014 2:35 PM, "Martinx - ジェームズ"
> wrote:
>
>> I think that it would be great too! OpenLDAP-as-a-Service... With
>> multi-domain support! :-)
>>
>> Neverthe
Doesn't Murano address this already?
On Aug 16, 2014 2:35 PM, "Martinx - ジェームズ"
wrote:
> I think that it would be great too! OpenLDAP-as-a-Service... With
> multi-domain support! :-)
>
> Nevertheless, last time I used Samba, was back in 2001... It is impressive
> these days! It worth take a l
I think that it would be great too! OpenLDAP-as-a-Service... With
multi-domain support! :-)
Nevertheless, last time I used Samba, was back in 2001... It is impressive
these days! It worth take a look... I'm using it for about two months now,
it is great!
Cheers!
On 16 August 2014 18:01, Cli
Excerpts from Martinx - ジェームズ's message of 2014-08-16 12:03:20 -0700:
> Hey Stackers,
>
> I'm wondering here... Samba4 is pretty solid (up coming 4.2 rocks), I'm
> using it on a daily basis as an AD DC controller, for both Windows and
> Linux Instances! With replication, file system ACLs - cifs,
13 matches
Mail list logo
