David, if I could take digital picture with my MX, KX, SuperA beleive
me I would.
The thing is, this is the last thing manufacturers want us to get. If
something like this hits the street, a lot less people will buy DSLRs.
As for sensor performance, just get the next version of this RE35 or
whatev
On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
> On 11 April 2011 22:01, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>> You're confusing economic infeasibility with "impossible". Every day I use
>> stuff that was "impossible" when I started in photography.
>>
>> If there's really a market for something like this,
On 11 April 2011 22:01, John Sessoms wrote:
> You're confusing economic infeasibility with "impossible". Every day I use
> stuff that was "impossible" when I started in photography.
>
> If there's really a market for something like this, some genius will
> eventually figure out how to do it and w
From: Rob Studdert
On 10 April 2011 22:23, John Sessoms wrote:
> Any protective coverings would have to be thin enough they wouldn't protrude
> materially beyond the film plane or the whole idea wouldn't work.
Which is why a true FF sensor of this type is a virtual impossibility.
You're c
On 10 April 2011 22:23, John Sessoms wrote:
> Any protective coverings would have to be thin enough they wouldn't protrude
> materially beyond the film plane or the whole idea wouldn't work.
Which is why a true FF sensor of this type is a virtual impossibility.
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image
From: Rob Studdert
On 5 April 2011 18:46, Joseph McAllister wrote:
Probably wouldn't be too hard to replace the spring loaded platen
on one of my LX Digital or Analog Dial Data backs with a FF
sensor, and cram the electronics into the fairly large battery
and clock box. Expand the Dial Data B
On Apr 9, 2011, at 15:46 , Rob Studdert wrote:
> On 5 April 2011 18:46, Joseph McAllister wrote:
>
>> Probably wouldn't be too hard to replace the spring loaded platen on one of
>> my LX Digital or Analog Dial Data backs with a FF sensor, and cram the
>> electronics into the fairly large batte
On 5 April 2011 18:46, Joseph McAllister wrote:
> Probably wouldn't be too hard to replace the spring loaded platen on one of
> my LX Digital or Analog Dial Data backs with a FF sensor, and cram the
> electronics into the fairly large battery and clock box. Expand the Dial Data
> Back's compar
On Apr 4, 2011, at 13:34 , John Sessoms wrote:
> From: David Parsons
>
>> Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick.
>> It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it
>> would economical. Would you pay a couple thousand dollars to use an
>> old film
Looks like it went much farther than anyone really intended:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/general-photography/139096-digital-film-gets-new-lease-life.html#post1453566
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Larry Colen wrote:
>
>>This is very intriguing
>>http://re35.net/
>
>
> If I believed this was real, I'd be out there snapping up Leica M-4P
> and Nikon F3 bodies, some lovely old lenses, right now.
>
> Actually, though, there is a new sensor technology in the labs that
> could be used for this once it is . A "nanno-dot" technology
> manufactured by a process which
Photovoltaic cells can be produced on thin amorphous film, so I suppose a
sensor made from amorphous material is possible.
Paul
On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:27 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> If I believed this was real, I'd be out there snapping up Leica M-4P
> and Nikon F3 bodies, some lovely old lenses
If I believed this was real, I'd be out there snapping up Leica M-4P
and Nikon F3 bodies, some lovely old lenses, right now.
Actually, though, there is a new sensor technology in the labs that
could be used for this once it is . A "nanno-dot" technology
manufactured by a process which deposits pho
From: David Parsons
Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick.
It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it
would economical. Would you pay a couple thousand dollars to use an
old film camera worth $20 (or even $200)?
What do you do with cameras
Larry Colen wrote:
>
>On Apr 4, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>>> This is very intriguing
>>> http://re35.net/
>>
>> Someone put a lot of work and care into that web site. But not enough
>> to hide the fact that it's a hoax.
>
>It's apparently an advertising fi
On Apr 4, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Larry Colen wrote:
>
>> This is very intriguing
>> http://re35.net/
>
> Someone put a lot of work and care into that web site. But not enough
> to hide the fact that it's a hoax.
It's apparently an advertising firm, and they seem to be getting
Larry Colen wrote:
>This is very intriguing
>http://re35.net/
Someone put a lot of work and care into that web site. But not enough
to hide the fact that it's a hoax.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:49 PM, David Parsons wrote:
> Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick.
> It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it
> would economical.
That was kind of my point. Don't the phase one backs go for about $20K? So
for th
Have you ever seen a digital back? They are at least an inch thick.
It's certainly possible to do, but I can't imagine any way that it
would economical. Would you pay a couple thousand dollars to use an
old film camera worth $20 (or even $200)?
What do you do with cameras that don't have removab
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Hope springs eternal. The technical problems with this must be nuts
> or someone would have done t by now, Either that or it would cost too
> much. An old MX with digifilm? My old MZ-S? I wonder what I would
> have paid to be able to us
Hope springs eternal. The technical problems with this must be nuts
or someone would have done t by now, Either that or it would cost too
much. An old MX with digifilm? My old MZ-S? I wonder what I would
have paid to be able to use all those bodies again without film.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7
From: Toine
Google siliconfilm. It was a real idea around 2001. If I'm not in
error also an actual 1.2 Mp product
http://www.dpreview.com/news/9909/99090501siliconfilm.asp
Never got beyond the prototype ... and I don't think it was even a
*working* prototype.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
One of the classic items that defines vaporware.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Toine wrote:
> Google siliconfilm. It was a real idea around 2001. If I'm not in
> error also an actual 1.2 Mp product
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/news/9909/99090501siliconfilm.asp
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail L
Google siliconfilm. It was a real idea around 2001. If I'm not in
error also an actual 1.2 Mp product
http://www.dpreview.com/news/9909/99090501siliconfilm.asp
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
From: Bruce Walker
On 11-04-03 7:09 PM, Krisjanis Linkevics wrote:
>> This is very intriguing
>> http://re35.net/
>>
>> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
> This idea has been around for many years now (more than 5), seeing as no information is
available (at all) and the contact pag
Looks like silicon film, I think they came close to shipping something,
maybe, 4-6mp with a serious crop factor, but only worked in a limited
number of cameras. Still I'd love to have something like that for my
LX, though I doubt that anything will ever come of it.
On 4/3/2011 7:00 PM, Larry
On 11-04-03 7:09 PM, Krisjanis Linkevics wrote:
This is very intriguing
http://re35.net/
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
This idea has been around for many years now (more than 5), seeing as no information is
available (at all) and the contact page says "will be available later th
> This is very intriguing
> http://re35.net/
Not really. If you check the name and http on that page, you will end up at
a German design firm -- and that's not sensor design -- where they tell you
of their efforts and how "... pünktlich zum 1. April wird die entsprechende
Pressemitteilung ..." se
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 16:00 -0700, "Larry Colen" wrote:
> This is very intriguing
> http://re35.net/
>
I'm pretty sure that this was another April 1 fun site.
(not that I wouldn't be interested if it was really..er, real).
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Wester
> This is very intriguing
> http://re35.net/
>
> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
This idea has been around for many years now (more than 5), seeing as no
information is available (at all) and the contact page says "will be available
later this year" without even mentioning what yea
This is very intriguing
http://re35.net/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
31 matches
Mail list logo