On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:45:29 +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
> So I guess with that change it's mostly working now, except that
> ns2.cmeerw.net doesn't return a RRSIG record when requesting the DNSKEY:
Hmm, seems to be working now... Not sure what could have changed...
Christof
--
http://cme
On 01/29/2011 01:35 PM, bert hubert wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:33:52AM +0100, Leen Besselink wrote:
>> I did notice one mistake in my sqlite3-dump, the domain-id did not
>> match, but adding the right id to the table didn't work either:
> Leen,
>
> It turns out the 'auth' field internally
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:01:47 +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:42:56 +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
> [...]
>> ns.cmeerw.net reads the zone data for cmeerw.priv.at from the bind
>> backend and has the keying information in the db:
>
> Just noticed - does the order of the bac
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:42:56 +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
[...]
> ns.cmeerw.net reads the zone data for cmeerw.priv.at from the bind
> backend and has the keying information in the db:
Just noticed - does the order of the backends specified in launch=
make a difference? Just noticed that I had
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:23:53 +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:38:12 +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
>> > That's really excellent news - I have just migrated my 2 nameservers
>> > to SVN revision 1928 and signed
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:33:52AM +0100, Leen Besselink wrote:
> I did notice one mistake in my sqlite3-dump, the domain-id did not
> match, but adding the right id to the table didn't work either:
Leen,
It turns out the 'auth' field internally would be random in case the
database was not runnin
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:38:12 +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
> > That's really excellent news - I have just migrated my 2 nameservers
> > to SVN revision 1928 and signed one of the zones (btw, the setup is:
> > master using bind b
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:38:12 +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote:
> That's really excellent news - I have just migrated my 2 nameservers
> to SVN revision 1928 and signed one of the zones (btw, the setup is:
> master using bind backend for the zone data and gsqlite3 for the key
> data - slave is using g
