Hi Charles,
If you're using ActiveState Perl on Windows, and ppm (its equivalent to CPAN),
you don't have to use makefiles, ppm installs everything for you.
Mark
- Original Message -
> Greetings all.
>
> Has anyone had much experience/luck running the current MARC/Perl on
> a PC using
module. No problems that I know of.
>
> -- Michael
>
> # Michael Doran, Systems Librarian
> # University of Texas at Arlington
> # 817-272-5326 office
> # 817-688-1926 mobile
> # do...@uta.edu
> # http://rocky.uta.edu/doran/
>
>
> > -Original Message-
Hi,
Anyone know if there are any reasons that MARC::Record et al can't be used to
create dumps of MFHD? For example, are there any leader/indicator values that
are specific to MFHD that are illegal in MARC bib records that might cause
MARC/Perl to puke?
Mark
Mark Jordan
Head of Li
Enrico,
If you suspect that $xml_text is in latin1, maybe you could confirm this by
running it through Encode::Guess and then encoding it to utf8:
http://search.cpan.org/~dankogai/Encode-2.42/lib/Encode/Guess.pm
Mark
- Original Message -
> I don't understand what I am doing wrong, but
Hi Jordi,
Did III convert your database to Unicode? If so, they encoded it into 'raw'
Unicode, not utf8. Also, how frequently is the error happening?
Mark
Mark Jordan
Head of Library Systems
W.A.C. Bennett Library, Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Ca
Jane,
I have a PHP command-line script that does Excel to MODS in an OAI wrapper, but
it's hard coded to the MODS elements we are using (i.e., I did it up for a
specific, never-ever-ever-to-change Excel template). I don't mind sharing it if
you think it would be useful.
Mark
Mark J
Mark Jordan wrote:
Or, you can remove the shebang totally and run
perl anne-test.pl
Woops, I meant:
perl anne-test.pl foo
which will print 'foo'.
Mark
th just a change of the shebang line, and it works fine.
When I hardcode the 'Hello' it works fine.
I figure this has to be excruciatingly simple, but I can't see it. Help?
--
Mark Jordan
Head of Library Systems
W.A.C. Bennett Library, Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, Bri
d Co-director of Libraries fax (316) 284-5843
Mennonite Library and Archives
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bethel College http://www.bethelks.edu/jthiesen/
300 E. 27th St.
North Newton, KS 67117-0531
--
Mark Jordan
Head of Library Systems
W.A.C. Bennett Library, Simon Fraser University
Burnab
TIA,
Mark
--
Mark Jordan
Head of Library Systems
W.A.C. Bennett Library, Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
Phone (604) 291 5753 / Fax (604) 291 3023
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.sfu.ca/~mjordan/
Mark
Edward Summers wrote:
On May 3, 2006, at 8:55 AM, Mark Jordan wrote:
I think it should mean "the zeroth occurrence of subfield 'u'", since
specifying which of a repeated group of subfields is a realistic task,
as you say. For example, each record has two 'u&
ot;the zeroth occurrence of subfield 'u'", since
specifying which of a repeated group of subfields is a realistic task,
as you say. For example, each record has two 'u's but all of the first
ones are garbage.
Mark
--
Mark Jordan
Head of Library Systems
W.A.C. Bennett Library, Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
Phone (604) 291 5753 / Fax (604) 291 3023
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.sfu.ca/~mjordan/
+1
Mark
--
Mark Jordan
Head of Library Systems
W.A.C. Bennett Library, Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
Phone (604) 291 5753 / Fax (604) 291 3023
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.sfu.ca/~mjordan/
Edward Summers wrote:
On Apr 29, 2006, at 10:31 AM, Mark Jordan wrote:
Maybe other people should verify the usefulness of a delete subfield
function before anyone does anything about it, though. Would a half
dozen +1 votes from perl4libers validate its usefulness?
Yes it would...but to get
Edward Summers wrote:
On Apr 29, 2006, at 1:08 AM, Mark Jordan wrote:
Edward Summers wrote:
Deleting subfields is a bit tricky since subfields may repeat, and
sometimes people just want to delete one of them. An unfortunate
state of affairs perhaps.
Yeah, I can see what you're saying
$notwanted->delete_subfield();
}
}
Mark
--
Mark Jordan
Head of Library Systems
W.A.C. Bennett Library, Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
Phone (604) 291 5753 / Fax (604) 291 3023
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.sfu.ca/~mjordan/
r should I just reconstruct the field, leaving out the unwanted subfield?
TIA,
Mark
--
Mark Jordan
Head of Library Systems
W.A.C. Bennett Library, Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
Phone (604) 291 5753 / Fax (604) 291 3023
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.sfu.ca/~mjordan/
i All,
>
> I would like to make a CGI form that will create MARC records using
> MARC::Record. Does anyone know of a project already doing somehting
> like this or know of somewhere where I can see code?
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
--
Mark Jordan
Head of Library Systems
W.
Hi Aaron,
I'm not sure if this will solve your quoting problems, but instead of rawdata()
you could trying using the encode() method to serialize a record object
for insertion into a database field. You can then use decode() to get the
record object back:
use MARC::File::USMARC;
# Serialize th
rd is substantially cleaner and easier to use
than the older modules (and more flexible
too because programmers aren't boxed in by bib-specific methods).
Besides, having to construct my own dates in 008 is a good excuse to use the
always-enjoyable Date::Calc module =8^)
Mark
Mark Jord
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:52:17PM -0500, Ed Summers wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:39:13AM -0700, Mark Jordan wrote:
> > When creating new records, do I have to construct all positions of 008
> > manually (specifically, 00-05 - Date entered on file)? Anything else I
> &
ually (specifically, 00-05 - Date entered on file)?
Anything else I should know about, like
008's relationship to the record leader?
Mark
Mark Jordan
Acting Coordinator of Library Systems
W.A.C. Bennett Library, Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
Phone (604) 291 5753
22 matches
Mail list logo