On 09/30/2013 02:16 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0800, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Not wising to disagree with PM, but |docs/feather/syn_index.html
states on line 1:|
The Synopsis documents are to be taken as the formal specification
for Perl 6 implementations
Hi Richard,
On 09/29/2013 07:28 AM, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Some suggestions about documentation.
Originally the Synopses were implementation oriented sumaries of the
previous description base Apocalypses. That meant that the Synopses were
derivative and secondary to the Apocalypses
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 01:28:48PM +0800, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
However, the Synopses are now primary specification and the
Apocalypses have only historical significance. Also there are more
Synopses than Apocalypses.
One correction: The test suite (roast) is the primary specification
Not wising to disagree with PM, but |docs/feather/syn_index.html
states on line 1:|
The Synopsis documents are to be taken as the formal specification for
Perl 6 implementations
I have seen elsewhere, can't remember where, that the parser written by
Larry is also considered a part of the
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0800, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Not wising to disagree with PM, but |docs/feather/syn_index.html
states on line 1:|
The Synopsis documents are to be taken as the formal specification
for Perl 6 implementations
What follows is just my opinion, there's plenty
Some suggestions about documentation.
Originally the Synopses were implementation oriented sumaries of the
previous description base Apocalypses. That meant that the Synopses were
derivative and secondary to the Apocalypses
However, the Synopses are now primary specification and the
