I am wondering whether to leave the release note pages for 8.3.2, 8.2.8,
etc saying "Release date: 2008-06-09", or to change them to something
like "Never released". Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make chang
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am wondering whether to leave the release note pages for 8.3.2, 8.2.8,
> etc saying "Release date: 2008-06-09", or to change them to something
> like "Never released". Thoughts?
>
"Never released" sounds better, otherwise pe
Tom Lane wrote:
> I am wondering whether to leave the release note pages for 8.3.2, 8.2.8,
> etc saying "Release date: 2008-06-09", or to change them to something
> like "Never released". Thoughts?
I think a mention in the 8.3.3 notes saying something like "the 8.3.2
version was never released to
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I am wondering whether to leave the release note pages for 8.3.2, 8.2.8,
>> etc saying "Release date: 2008-06-09", or to change them to something
>> like "Never released". Thoughts?
> I think a mention in the 8.3.3 notes saying somet
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I am wondering whether to leave the release note pages for 8.3.2, 8.2.8,
> >> etc saying "Release date: 2008-06-09", or to change them to something
> >> like "Never released". Thoughts?
>
> > I think a mention i
