On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 7:13 PM, tedd wrote:
> I have chosen jquery at last. because:
>>
>> * jQuery has a huge number of plugins available for everything you could
>> imagine wanting to do online
>> * The information on the jQuery site is extremely well documented, with
>> many
>> examples
>> *
I have chosen jquery at last. because:
• jQuery has a huge number of plugins available for everything you could
imagine wanting to do online
• The information on the jQuery site is extremely well documented, with many
examples
• jQuery does not extend the elements that it works on, which means tha
On Dec 15, 2009, at 3:12 AM, Joseph Masoud wrote:
> On 15 Dec 2009, at 08:50, Ali Asghar Toraby Parizy
> wrote:
>
>> Which one is more active than others? I mean which project extends
>> faster and better, in future?
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Philip Thompson
>> wrote:
>>> On Dec
On 15 Dec 2009, at 08:50, Ali Asghar Toraby Parizy > wrote:
Which one is more active than others? I mean which project extends
faster and better, in future?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Philip Thompson > wrote:
On Dec 14, 2009, at 4:27 AM, Ali Asghar Toraby Parizy wrote:
Hi
I think the b
Which one is more active than others? I mean which project extends
faster and better, in future?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Philip Thompson wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2009, at 4:27 AM, Ali Asghar Toraby Parizy wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> I think the best choice is jquery until now.
>> But, is it reasonable
On Dec 14, 2009, at 4:27 AM, Ali Asghar Toraby Parizy wrote:
> Hi
> I think the best choice is jquery until now.
> But, is it reasonable to combine jquery and other library to client
> side and server side scripting respectively?
> By the way, where i can find good lessons about jquery and php?
I
Hi
I think the best choice is jquery until now.
But, is it reasonable to combine jquery and other library to client
side and server side scripting respectively?
By the way, where i can find good lessons about jquery and php?
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Angelo Zanetti wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 20
> On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 15:34 +0330, shahrzad khorrami wrote:
>
> salam ;)
>
> JQuery is good one.
>
>
>
Yes I agree with JQuery but you also get JQuery UI (user interface).
You can also check out extjs.com. good luck.
Angelo
http://www.elemental.co.za
http://www.wapit.co.za
>
>
> JQuery i
Well I would recommend jQuery for client-side ajax.
But if you're looking for an integrated solution for php on the server-side,
then you might want to check out Raxan for PHP - http://raxanpdi.com
Best regards,
__
Raymond Irving
Raxan for PHP - PHP/Ajax made simple
___
2009/12/12 Floyd Resler :
> I've always been a big fan of prototype which does AJAX plus a whole lot more.
>
> Take care,
> Floyd
>
> On Dec 12, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Ali Asghar Toraby Parizy wrote:
>
>> Hi friends.
>> What ajax library do you suggest for php developers?
>> Can i use gwt with php, or I
I've always been a big fan of prototype which does AJAX plus a whole lot more.
Take care,
Floyd
On Dec 12, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Ali Asghar Toraby Parizy wrote:
> Hi friends.
> What ajax library do you suggest for php developers?
> Can i use gwt with php, or It is compatible only with java web appli
Thanks for your replies. Which one is better for GUI building? I'm looking
for a ajax library that is comfortable for client side applications. I think
php is plenty comfortable For server side issues, so I can't see any reason
to toil in experiencing new technologies.
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 3:37
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 15:34 +0330, shahrzad khorrami wrote:
> salam ;)
>
> JQuery is good one.
>
>
>
JQuery is good for client-side, did you want something for the server?
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
salam ;)
JQuery is good one.
--
Shahrzad Khorrami
14 matches
Mail list logo
