On 13 Oct 2016, at 1:06, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
On the surface, SA hitting multiple RBLs sounds inefficient.
SpamAssassin is inherently inefficient. That's why in a production
environment with heavily loaded systems, it is important to have layers
ahead of it to deal with the bulk of
:11 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Reply To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: PostFix as a "/dev/null" MTA?
On 12 Oct 2016, at 18:59, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> You really can't rate RBLs in a normal setup since if one rejects the
> email, the others don't ge
On 12 Oct 2016, at 18:59, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
You really can't rate RBLs in a normal setup since if one rejects the
email, the others don't get a try.
That's not the case if you use DNSBLs in postscreen or SpamAssassin. In
those cases the lookups get done asynchronously and all the
There are tips out there on how to set up a catch all account to accept mail
that wasn't addressed to any known user. That is a (very) small part of your
project. When you have a catch all, nothing bounces IF the email at least when
to your FQDN.
In your project, it would be a service to rate
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 03:25:25PM -0400, Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt wrote:
> I've done some searching of the list archives and the web, but I can't lay
> hands on an answer to this question:
>
> - is there a way, ideally documented in a HOWTO or guide, to configure
> PostFix such that:
>
>
Glenn Forbes Fleming Larratt:
> Folks,
>
> I've done some searching of the list archives and the web, but I can't lay
> hands on an answer to this question:
>
> - is there a way, ideally documented in a HOWTO or guide, to configure
> PostFix such that:
>
> - it will accept any mail
