On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 20:56, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 16:47 +, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 22:22, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:16 PM, John Palmieri wrote:
>> >>
>> >> - "Tomeu Vizoso" wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> t
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 22:17, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:25, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>> Zach suggested when2meet, please record your preferences:
>>
>> http://when2meet.com/?25955-M2Ywd
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tomeu
>>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:25, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:15, Simon van der Linden
> wrote:
>> On 02/17/2010 08:07 PM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
. What about dates?
I don't have any strong preference, but I'm going to propose April 1-5
just for the sake of
- "Tomeu Vizoso" wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:15, Simon van der Linden
> wrote:
> > On 02/17/2010 08:07 PM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> >>>
> >>> . What about dates?
> >>> I don't have any strong preference, but I'm going to propose April
> 1-5
> >>> just for the sake of starting the d
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:15, Simon van der Linden
wrote:
> On 02/17/2010 08:07 PM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
>>>
>>> . What about dates?
>>> I don't have any strong preference, but I'm going to propose April 1-5
>>> just for the sake of starting the discussion.
>>
>> That may be a rough week for p
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Opinions? Once we agree on the above points, we can come up with a
> budget and a more detailed plan to present to the GNOME Foundation
> board.
April works fine for me; thanks again for looking at a hackfest! I'm
pretty excited about getti
On 02/17/2010 08:07 PM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
>> . What about dates?
>> I don't have any strong preference, but I'm going to propose April 1-5
>> just for the sake of starting the discussion.
>
> That may be a rough week for people as it overlaps both easter and
> passover.
No problem for me. I'
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:09, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 16:56, John Palmieri wrote:
>>
>> - "Tomeu Vizoso" wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> looks like we have agreed on a set of tasks and we have people with
>>> the will and capacity to work on them during the hackfest. Thi
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 16:56, John Palmieri wrote:
>
> - "Tomeu Vizoso" wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> looks like we have agreed on a set of tasks and we have people with
>> the will and capacity to work on them during the hackfest. This
>> concrete set of tasks may seem small at first, but I thi
On 2/13/10 2:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Right now it seems to me that Boston, MA would be the best place to
> hold the hackfest, as two people are local, one lives relatively
> close, and facilities have been offered. What about the dates?
I'm away from March 21-27 so April might be better.
Joh
- "Tomeu Vizoso" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> looks like we have agreed on a set of tasks and we have people with
> the will and capacity to work on them during the hackfest. This
> concrete set of tasks may seem small at first, but I think it's just
> what is left to do in order to keep Python as
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:51 PM, John Palmieri wrote:
> So we haven't heard from Johan at all? It would be good to have him there at
> least for guidance. I don't know what the team looks like these days but he
> has always been the public face of PyGTK so it would be nice for him to at
> le
On 02/13/2010 08:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Opinions? Once we agree on the above points, we can come up with a
> budget and a more detailed plan to present to the GNOME Foundation
> board.
Good for me.
--
Simon van der Linden
___
pygtk mailing list
Hi all,
looks like we have agreed on a set of tasks and we have people with
the will and capacity to work on them during the hackfest. This
concrete set of tasks may seem small at first, but I think it's just
what is left to do in order to keep Python as a compelling language on
which to develop f
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 17:51, John Palmieri wrote:
>
> - "Tomeu Vizoso" wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 16:48, Zachary Goldberg
>> wrote:
>> > Callbacks, and recently ive been bitten hard by the lack of
>> nullable
>> > argument support so thats in my crosshairs as well.
>>
>> Cool. Do p
- "Tomeu Vizoso" wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 16:48, Zachary Goldberg
> wrote:
> > Callbacks, and recently ive been bitten hard by the lack of
> nullable
> > argument support so thats in my crosshairs as well.
>
> Cool. Do people think we should wait a bit more for more interested
> par
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 16:48, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> Callbacks, and recently ive been bitten hard by the lack of nullable
> argument support so thats in my crosshairs as well.
Cool. Do people think we should wait a bit more for more interested
participants?
Regards,
Tomeu
> -ZG
>
>
> On Tue
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 22:22, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:16 PM, John Palmieri wrote:
>>
>> - "Tomeu Vizoso" wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> there's interest in having a hackfest sponsored by the GNOME
>>> Foundation that would give a push to some issues that are important
>
Hi,
On 02/05/2010 06:50 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> there's interest in having a hackfest sponsored by the GNOME
> Foundation that would give a push to some issues that are important to
> the Pygtk community: support for Python 3.x and gobject-introspection.
>
> How does it sound?
Excellent. I alre
- "Tomeu Vizoso" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there's interest in having a hackfest sponsored by the GNOME
> Foundation that would give a push to some issues that are important
> to
> the Pygtk community: support for Python 3.x and
> gobject-introspection.
>
> How does it sound?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom
Hi,
there's interest in having a hackfest sponsored by the GNOME
Foundation that would give a push to some issues that are important to
the Pygtk community: support for Python 3.x and gobject-introspection.
How does it sound?
Regards,
Tomeu
___
pygtk
21 matches
Mail list logo
