Le 09/05/2011 19:54, R. David Murray a écrit :
No it isn't. The commit message isn't pulled into the new branch.
Sorry, your terminology does not make sense. If you mean that the
commit message is not reused in the new commit after the merge,
it’s
true. However, the commit message with t
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
> R. David Murray writes:
> > On Mon, 09 May 2011 18:23:45 -0500, Benjamin Peterson
> wrote:
>
> > > *cough* http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/GraphlogExtension
> >
> > I'm sorry, but I've looked at the output of that and the menta
On Tue, 10 May 2011 11:51:19 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
wrote:
> R. David Murray writes:
> > On Mon, 09 May 2011 18:23:45 -0500, Benjamin Peterson
> wrote:
>
> > > *cough* http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/GraphlogExtension
> >
> > I'm sorry, but I've looked at the output of that and th
Le 10/05/2011 04:51, Stephen J. Turnbull a écrit :
R. David Murray writes:
> On Mon, 09 May 2011 18:23:45 -0500, Benjamin Peterson
wrote:
> > *cough* http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/GraphlogExtension
>
> I'm sorry, but I've looked at the output of that and the mental overhead
>
R. David Murray writes:
> On Mon, 09 May 2011 18:23:45 -0500, Benjamin Peterson
> wrote:
> > *cough* http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/GraphlogExtension
>
> I'm sorry, but I've looked at the output of that and the mental overhead
> has so far proven too high for it to be of any use to me.
On Mon, 09 May 2011 18:23:45 -0500, Benjamin Peterson
wrote:
> 2011/5/9 R. David Murray :
> > On Mon, 09 May 2011 09:08:53 -0500, Benjamin Peterson g> wrote:
> >> I thought the whole point of merging was that you brought a changeset
> >> from one branch to another. This why I just write "merge"
2011/5/9 R. David Murray :
> On Mon, 09 May 2011 09:08:53 -0500, Benjamin Peterson
> wrote:
>> I thought the whole point of merging was that you brought a changeset
>> from one branch to another. This why I just write "merge" because
>> otherwise you're technically duplicating information that is
On 5/9/2011 1:54 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
If I do 'hg log' and search for a revno (that I got from hg annotate),
the commit message describing the change is not attached to that revno,
nor as far as I know is there a tool that makes it easy to get from that
revno to the explanatory commit mess
On Mon, 09 May 2011 17:55:42 +0200, =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=89ric_Araujo?=
wrote:
> Le 09/05/2011 16:08, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
> > 2011/5/9 Victor Stinner :
> >> For merge commits: many developers just write "merge" or "merge
> >> 3.1". I
> >> have to go to the parent commit (and something to the g
Hi,
Le 09/05/2011 16:08, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
2011/5/9 Victor Stinner :
For merge commits: many developers just write "merge" or "merge
3.1". I
have to go to the parent commit (and something to the grandparent,
3.1->3.2->3.3) to learn more about the commit.
I follow conventions I’ve s
On Mon, 09 May 2011 09:08:53 -0500, Benjamin Peterson
wrote:
> I thought the whole point of merging was that you brought a changeset
> from one branch to another. This why I just write "merge" because
> otherwise you're technically duplicating information that is pulled
> onto the branch by mergi
Le lundi 09 mai 2011 à 09:08 -0500, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
> It seems like something that should be solved by tools like a display
> visual graph indicating what is merged. (like Bazaar)
Yeah, we could fix buildbot, hg.python.org website, improve hg log, and
all other tools using Mercurial. B
2011/5/9 Victor Stinner :
> Hi,
>
> Commit changelogs are important to understand why the code was changed.
> I regulary use hg blame to search which commit introduced a particular
> line of code, and I am always happy if I can find an issue number
> because it usually contains the whole story.
>
>
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 08:40:03AM -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
> +1. What I do is, in the edit window for the commit message, I pull
> in .hg/last-message.txt, and just type 'Merge' in front of my previous
Thanks for this tip. I shall start following this one too.
--
Senthil
_
On Mon, 09 May 2011 12:32:48 +0200, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> For merge commits: many developers just write "merge" or "merge 3.1". I
> have to go to the parent commit (and something to the grandparent,
> 3.1->3.2->3.3) to learn more about the commit.
>
> Would it be possible to repeat the changel
15 matches
Mail list logo