Or check out Shill. It may just be what you want. — Matthias
> On Nov 26, 2016, at 3:45 PM, Alexis King wrote:
>
> Many of the other answers here are good, but I want to try and give a
> couple more options and a little more context.
>
> First of all, in Racket, the phrase “syntactically cor
The documentation site includes links to PDFs. You could print — Matthias
> On Nov 26, 2016, at 3:22 PM, SR wrote:
>
> The "Program Contour" feature is another revelation! I appreciate, finally,
> why those "pesky" many-line declarations of things like
> ;;
Go to menu item: edit, preferences, background-expansion
and enable it.
Sometimes it is necessary to close and reopen DrRacket to get the choices
active.
Jos
-Original Message-
From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of SR
Sent: sábado, 26 de
Many of the other answers here are good, but I want to try and give a
couple more options and a little more context.
First of all, in Racket, the phrase “syntactically correct” is a little
bit vague. It could mean that a program is successfully parsed from text
to s-expressions, which is the reade
Jos, What is "background expansion" and how do I turn it on to see if it helps
me? I just did a search of help and didn't find the term. I did look around
in view but don't see that as a choice.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" grou
The "Program Contour" feature is another revelation! I appreciate, finally, why
those "pesky" many-line declarations of things like
;;;
; ;;; ; ;; ; ; ;; ;
; ; ; ; ;; ; ;
For me DrRacket's IDE is perfect, especially with background expansion turned
on.
The IDE includes things like:
Have a list of all definitions and jump to one of them.
Right click an imported variable and you can go to its docs or to the file it
comes from.
Checking matching parentheses (pl
As Matthew B wrote, but in general, I think you have hit the nail on the head —
if you come from/are used to a world where the IDE governs your thinking.
With Racket we try a different approach; we want the language to govern your
thinking and we want the language to allow you to think directl
On Nov 26, 2016, at 9:51 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
> Thanks. I believe the 32 bit version works, so you can use that as a
> workaround for now.
If you build from source, you can force a 32-bit build by appending a config
string to `make ...` like so:
make CONFIGURE_ARGS_qq="--disable-mac64"
or
On Nov 26, 2016, at 7:54 AM, SR wrote:
> I am hoping someone out there can recommend a strong editor / IDE which makes
> it trivial to collapse blocks of code or otherwise make it a lot easier to
> navigate through long racket programs
FWIW, DrRacket does have a "Collapse S-expression" functio
Thanks. I believe the 32 bit version works, so you can use that as a
workaround for now.
Robby
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:34 AM, 'Scott Brown' via Racket Users
wrote:
> I recently bought a new MacBook Pro and installed Racket. Unfortunately,
> DrRacket crashes immediately when I try to open it
I recently bought a new MacBook Pro and installed Racket. Unfortunately,
DrRacket crashes immediately when I try to open it. It appears to be due an
issue with its interaction with the touch bar.
Below is the problem report from the crash.
-Scott
Process: DrRacket [16616]
Path:
Hi,
I've never been a great programmer although I've done a fair amount of
programming back in the days of C, Pascal, etc. I think racket is the right
language for me based on expressive power, etc. but I confess it currently
seems like about the worst language for me in terms of "can't see the
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:37 AM, luis.osa.gdc wrote:
> Hi, everyone!
> ```
> (check-= (t-test bacteria-a bacteria-b) 13.0 0.1)
> ```
>
> In short: is there a way to specify tolerance in `eval:check`?
Perhaps, instead of checking directly the result of t-test you can
check (good-enough (t-test .
Thanks for the clear answer.
I'll try raco pkg install ...,
but command line stuff is troublesome on windows.
But I'll try.
Jos
_
From: Matthew Butterick [mailto:m...@mbtype.com]
Sent: viernes, 25 de noviembre de 2016 23:03
To: Jos Koot
Cc: Racket Users
Subject: Re: [racket-users] css an
Some weeks ago, I just had the exact same problem while developing a
"server.rkt" module with Vim. I use the Syntactic plugin to check syntax, and
this plugin in turn uses the `racket` executable to find syntax problems.
My solution was to add the args "--load" when executing the module with
`r
Hi, everyone!
I am writing a simple statistical package for Racket, and I would like to have
tests within my Scribble documentation (as well as Rackunit tests in the
implementation modules).
For the Scribble tests, I am using `eval:check`. But I have noticed that the
tests do not pass unless t
raco read or raco expand may be the closest to doing this without doing much
else.
https://docs.racket-lang.org/raco/read.html
Is there some way to e.g. hook some of DrRackets syntax checker up to a raco
check-syntax? That would be convenient in the terminal.
--
Sent from my phoneamajig
> On
18 matches
Mail list logo
