[Radiant] radiant keyword list is too small

2009-09-01 Thread dave-
When describing a document for the search engines using the tag you are supposed to limit the keywords list to 1,000 characters or less. Radiant only allows to a list of about 200 characters. dave- ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org

Re: [Radiant] radiant keyword list is too small

2009-09-01 Thread John Polling
Hi Dave, Most SEO experts now say that keywords tag gets ignored by most search engines, due to years of abuse. Search engines generally read the content of the page now to get keywords. Regards John Polling On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:37, dave- wrote: When describing a document for the searc

Re: [Radiant] radiant keyword list is too small

2009-09-01 Thread john muhl
i've never heard of anyone using, recommending or suggesting 1000 characters of keywords. where did you read that? most sources i've seen suggest about 5 keywords or about 250 characters. beside that aren't keywords mostly useless for search engines since their mostly used by spammers? On Tue, Sep

[Radiant] Page Attachments extension: enhanced for 0.8.0

2009-09-01 Thread Jason Garber
I converted the tests to specs and updated it to use Rails 2.3's nested attributes just like was done for page parts in Radiant 0.8.0. Now deleting and reordering (drag and drop) doesn't apply until you save. The cucumber features use webrat + selenium. Pretty cool; check it out. So fa

[Radiant] Sandboxing

2009-09-01 Thread Jeff Casimir
Hi all, This morning I was thinking about a project where I want users to be able to create flexible reports using Ruby/ERB and wondering how that might integrate into Radiant. Has anyone done or seen work with sandboxing ERB inside your Radiant pages? I'd want to expose a lot of Ruby to the use

Re: [Radiant] Sandboxing

2009-09-01 Thread Charlie Robbins
There was an extension called Backdoor that I used about a year ago that allowed the evaluation of ERB inside Radius tags. It didn't do any sandboxing though, so you left yourself wide open (I guess that's why it was called backdoor). Hope that helps some. Charlie On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:03 AM,

Re: [Radiant] radiant keyword list is too small

2009-09-01 Thread john muhl
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM, dave4c03 wrote: > The quote is in a new book I bought about HTML 4.01 strict. > "HTML in easy steps" sixth edition (2009) by Mike McGrath page 28 says: > >> Promotion of the page by keywords is best achieved by following some >> simple guidelines: > > Use only lower

Re: [Radiant] radiant keyword list is too small

2009-09-01 Thread Brian Gernhardt
On Sep 1, 2009, at 4:37 AM, dave- wrote: When describing a document for the search engines using the tag you are supposed to limit the keywords list to 1,000 characters or less. Radiant only allows to a list of about 200 characters. dave- Not that I really recommend long meta tags, for