On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Dirk Mueller said:
> On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Will Stephenson wrote:
> > Adds a much-requested feature: a way for protocols to give a hint to
> > Kopete which form a chat should take.
>
> Thats not a release critical bugfix, is it?
Not
On Saturday 19 January 2008 16:32:03 Allen Winter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> FYI, I started a new Release Team project page on Techbase [1].
Howdy, folks! The project page looks good.
I decided to join the r-t list so I can help communicate distros' needs
affecting release scheduling and "add my m
On Sunday 20 January 2008 12:42:39 Richard Moore wrote:
> On 1/19/08, Jonathan Riddell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * System Settings Unix tools integration (possibly with Guidance KDE 4
> > * port)
>
> Could you explain this one?
Embedding eg YaST modules (as used to be done) or Guidance in Sy
On Monday 31 March 2008, Sebastian Kügler said:
> On Monday 31 March 2008 15:27:31 Allen Winter wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 March 2008 17:59:52 Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > according to [1] the KDE 4.1 feature plan is open until 31 March 2008.
>
> Will spotted that the date
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Cornelius Schumacher said:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008 04:26:54 Allen Winter wrote:
> > One idea is to eliminate kdepim and move any of the apps
> > that people still care about and actively maintain to extragear.
>
> That would be a bad idea. I think we should keep KDE
On Wednesday 30 April 2008 15:57:50 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008 07:04:13 Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
> > Which apps are ready? KMail and KOrganizer, I gather? How about
> > KAddressbook? Knotes? Akregator? That would make for a good PIM (it's the
> > apps I use anyway ;-)).
> >
>
On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Pino Toscano said:
> > 4. kweather
> > kweather is something curious. Some parts are ported (kweatherreport and
> > kweatherservice)
>
> AFAIR, kweather has a service running on DCOP/D-Bus for getting the weather
> data, and clients communicate to it via the bus wire.
>
>
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Tobias Hunger said:
> Am Freitag, 9. Mai 2008 23:16:30 schrieben Sie:
> > On Tuesday 06 May 2008, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> > > How are you providing access
> > > to your D-Bus interfaces?
> >
> > We install the xml file and we let "client" code use qdbusxml2cpp on it.
>
> I wo
for 4.1 now anyway. During the 4.2 release
cycle, copy the (unstable) headers to kjots svn until the plugin is done then
shift the whole lot into PIM then - job done.
Decide when a kjots plugin is realistic, and make an appropriate decision.
Will
--
Will Stephenson
IRC: Bille
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
On Thursday 15 May 2008 17:29:39 Allen Winter wrote:
> It can.
> The plugin is listed on the features page and Steve is already
> working hard to make it happen for 4.1.
My bad, I assumed the move was anticipating a kjots plugin for 4.2. I
withdraw my objection.
Will
_
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 12:28:27 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> I'll be on vacation next week so I don't expect to have a reliable Internet
> connection (nor the guts to tell my girlfriend that I have to work) to do
> the release announcement for beta1 and website updating dance next Tuesday.
>
> If anyo
gt; > > -Allen
> >
> > Uhm, no, we didn't. The message freeze applies to documentation too, or
> > at least it did in past releases, since documentation is translated.
>
> Right.
> This is new.
>
> Will Stephenson (representing the doc writers) thought some
Guys
I'm writing to you as module coordinators of extragear and kdegraphics.
Have you noticed the dependency loop between extragear/graphics and
kdegraphics?
kdegraphics/gwenview requires libkipi from extragear/libs, but
extragear/libs/kipi-plugins requires kdegraphics/libksane
How do you pr
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 14:10:05 Matthias Kretz wrote:
> So, KDE 4.3 should require Phonon 4.3. Everything else needs to be optional
> (I already told Marco about this for mplayerthumbs).
What did you tell him? Is he going to hack mplayerthumbs so it doesn't
require VideoWidget::snapshot() or rem
On Tuesday 24 November 2009 17:25:03 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 November 2009 1:48:01 pm Timothy Pearson wrote:
> > I have been maintaining and improving KDE3 for Ubuntu for a while now,
> > and have accumulated a massive set of patches that:
> > * Add lots of functionality
> > * Fix o
On Saturday 06 February 2010 15:11:24 Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> the big problem is that I cannot reproduce this error.
> Even without the patch queries work...
> I need to look into that when I am back from the FOSDEM.
>
I can reproduce it with 4.3.98, soprano 2.3.70, virtuoso 6.1. I asked Sebas,
s that.
Will
> A real showstopper is the dbus problem though :(
>
> http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-7475
Yuck.
> Cheers,
> Sebastian
>
> Will Stephenson wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 February 2010 15:11:24 Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> >> the
Hi team
Is there a 4.5 schedule that can be published on Techbase? People here at
SUSE are asking me.
Will
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
On Friday 14 May 2010 14:49:34 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Friday 14 May 2010 8:42:21 am Allen Winter wrote:
> > Howdy All,
> >
> > I regret to inform everyone that kdepim will not be ready for a 4.5 Beta1
> > that is scheduled to happen in a few days.
> >
> > We estimate an extra month will be need
On Thursday 20 May 2010 11:36:15 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Monday 17 May 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > If that's not achievable in the 4.5 timeframe, maybe we should start
> > thinking about 4.6 instead?
>
> so kdepim should be excluded from 4.5 tagging. what about kdepimlibs?
>
> will kdepiml
With my distribution hat on I'm wondering when KDE SC 4.6 will come out.
Aiming for our traditional end of January release, we would have a 5 1/2 month
cycle, which is appreciably shorter than what we have achieved during the last
2 releases due to slippages. However if it is released later, it
On Monday 02 August 2010 20:59:24 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Hi Release-Team,
>
> I know that the release is scheduled for tomorrow, nevertheless I want
to
> make you aware of a possible problem with Intel graphics cards and
>
compositing.
>
> I think I first have to explain a little bit: KWin uses
On Friday 29 October 2010 00:55:55 Allen Winter wrote:
> I believe exception requests must go through the release team, so I'm
> redirecting.
>
> On Thursday 28 October 2010 3:25:56 am Michael Leupold wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as announced at Akademy we would really like to get a first
> > implemen
On Thursday 09 Dec 2010 21:14:20 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Thursday 09 December 2010 2:23:26 pm Tom Albers wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >
> > > > We really need the extra time; data migration is still taking time
> > > > to get
> > > > right.
> > >
> > > For having tried KMail trunk (
On Tuesday 18 January 2011 10:17:47 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> how are the pros/cons regarding declaring the current 4.6 branch as 4.6.0
> or adding another RC to the game?
>
> Looks like we have two bugs marked as ship stopper: bug 246678 and 262274,
> so just ignoring that is a bit of a problem for
On Thursday 20 January 2011 14:53:19 Martin Schlander wrote:
> Tirsdag den 18. januar 2011 20:56:00 skrev Frank Reininghaus:
> > Am Dienstag 18 Januar 2011, 20:06:52 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> > > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011, Frank Reininghaus wrote:
> > > > Am Dienstag 18 Januar 2011, 17:57:01 sch
On Monday 24 January 2011 11:17:17 Dario Freddi wrote:
> SVN commit 1216708 by dafre:
>
> CCMAIL: Dirk Mueller
> CCMAIL: release-team@kde.org
>
> Backporting r1216705
>
> This commit is critical and needs to be released in 4.6.0; otherwise it
> needs to be reverted.
I don't understand this sen
On Monday 24 January 2011 11:19:16 Dario Freddi wrote:
> SVN commit 1216709 by dafre:
>
> CCMAIL: Dirk Mueller
> CCMAIL: release-team@kde.org
>
> Backporting r1216706
>
> This commit fixes a critical bug in the migrator, hence it should be
> released with 4.6.0
What bug, so we can look for dow
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 12:52:14 Will Stephenson wrote:
> On Monday 24 January 2011 11:19:16 Dario Freddi wrote:
> > SVN commit 1216709 by dafre:
> >
> > CCMAIL: Dirk Mueller
> > CCMAIL: release-team@kde.org
> >
> > Backporting r1216706
> >
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 12:51:52 Will Stephenson wrote:
> n Monday 24 January 2011 11:17:17 Dario Freddi wrote:
> > SVN commit 1216708 by dafre:
> >
> >
> > CCMAIL: Dirk Mueller
> > CCMAIL: release-team@kde.org
> >
> >
> >
> > Backport
We forgot to disable this when branching 4.6, which kills Eclipse:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=247398
Will
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
SVN commit 1217284 by wstephens:
Remove MALLOC_CHECK_ from 4.6 branch
CCMAIL: release-team@kde.org
CCMAIL: kde-packa...@kde.org
M +0 -12 startkde.cmake
--- branches/KDE/4.6/kdebase/workspace/startkde.cmake #1217283:1217284
@@ -36,18 +36,6 @@
# we have to unset this for Darwin since it
On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:52:48 Tom Albers wrote:
> Fine by me.
> 2 beta's and 2 rc's is working nicely for us I think. Also the cycle as a
> whole seems to work ok.
+1, I don't see any problems with it.
Will
___
release-team mailing list
release-t
On Saturday 26 Feb 2011 11:21:28 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> took a lot longer than expected due to solving various git/svn packaging
> issues in my scripts, but I think I now was able to upload the first set of
> tarballs.
>
> Please be especially aware if anything is lost in those tarballs (m
On Tuesday 01 Mar 2011 18:12:20 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Jonathan Riddell writes:
> > There's also a binary incompatible change in libkopete
> >
> > http://websvn.kde.org/branches/KDE/4.6/kdenetwork/kopete/libkopete/kopete
> > accountmanager.h?r1=1208598&r2=1219502
> >
> > http://paste.kde
eded to find the libs in libs/.
Will
--
Will Stephenson, openSUSE Team
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nürnberg - AG Nürnberg - HRB 16746 - GF: Markus Rex
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
On Friday 15 Apr 2011 22:03:53 Allen Winter wrote:
> A recently reported bug [1] that can crash Plasma (calendar stuff) has been
> traced back to using the akonadi serializer built against the kcal
> library.
>
> We need the akonadi serializer to build against the new KCalCore library,
> which bec
On Saturday 21 May 2011 02:00:44 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> just finished creating the first set of tarballs for Beta1. compiling
> started to look good, but I'm not yet through all of them.
>
> Please report any important packaging issues or must-fix bugs to the
> release- t...@kde.org mailinglist.
k
On Thursday 16 Jun 2011 13:50:14 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Thursday, June 16, 2011 13:22:10 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > as I didn't realize that Beta2 was scheduled that soon after Beta1
> > announcement and I was on a longer vacation, how about we skip Beta2 and
> > go with RC1 directly?
> >
> >
> those match to the breakdown you are using.
We're using them, and the consensus among the team so far is that they allow
faster builds (broader dependency tree instead of deeper) and isolate failures
better. These are the kde.org tarballs; is
On Saturday 15 October 2011 15:35:27 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> in general it would be great if you could tag 4.7.2 and push the tags out...
> at least kdepim-runtime does not have it yet.
+1, I'm trying to do a branch diff update in our packages here.
Will
_
On Thursday 13 October 2011 12:07:05 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> As you all (probably) know, Dennis Ritchie has passed away. In my
> opinion, we should somehow make tribute to him.
>
> I'm not sure the idea to name a release after him would be fitting,
> but that's the only thing I've came up with.
KDE &
On Saturday 15 October 2011 21:29:25 Will Stephenson wrote:
> On Saturday 15 October 2011 15:35:27 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > in general it would be great if you could tag 4.7.2 and push the tags
> > out... at least kdepim-runtime does not have it yet.
>
> +1, I'm
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 23:03:57 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Hi guys, are we releasing 4.9?
>
> Last i heard the Frameworks guys were aiming at some kind of release around
> Akademy time (which is kind of the same time we'd release 4.9 in a 6 months
> cycle). Obviously this means that either:
>
On Tuesday 03 Apr 2012 00:37:53 Thomas Lübking wrote:
> W/o wanting to be nasty (rather nervous), has
> http://commits.kde.org/kde-workspace/a5c8eca4759d1aace9fc265fef2b7ebb88ca369
> 0 been picked or will it be picked for the official 4.8.2 release?
Not yet, but I'm hoping Dirk will pick this and
I'm not aware of any showstopper issues for a 4.8.2 today, I assume we'll
announce it later this afternoon.
Sebas, are you doing the announcements?
Will
--
Will Stephenson, openSUSE Board, Booster, KDE Developer
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
I'm not aware of any showstopper issues for a 4.8.2 today, I assume we'll
announce it later this afternoon.
Sebas, are you doing the announcements?
Will
--
Will Stephenson, openSUSE Board, Booster, KDE Developer
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
The timing on the release schedule* is confusing.
Eg "1.25 Tuesday, April 3, 2012: KDE SC 4.8.2 release" - you'd think we were
going to release yesterday. So I enabled publishing on our repo.
But according to Dirk, to clarify developer uncertainty about how late on
tagging day one can commit, t
a look to see if the announcement is out or not.
As a distributor, I like to have the packages out there shortly before the
announcement is out (typically at about 4pm Europe time) otherwise they are
not out and mirrored until the next day.
Will
--
Will Stephenson, openSUSE Board, Booster, KDE
On Sunday 03 Jun 2012 22:28:31 Michael Pyne wrote:
> I like to view it as we have specific points-of-contact within the various
> distributions who have agreed to interact directly with us, the KDE
> developers and community in order to deliver the best possible KDE for
> their distribution. As s
50 matches
Mail list logo
