Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#discussion_r47428935
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -469,13 +495,13 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
this(Word
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#discussion_r47428877
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -77,6 +77,19 @@ class Word2Vec extends Serializable with Logging {
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10160#issuecomment-164118736
Thank you, everyone! : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10266#discussion_r47428568
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ScalaUDF.scala
---
@@ -1029,24 +1029,27 @@ case class ScalaUDF(
/
Github user yanboliang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7357
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user xflin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9518#issuecomment-164114988
StatsdSink unit tests have been added.
I've also tested the patch on a spark v1.5.2 deployment with datadog agent
installed. Datadog agent contains a (slightly en
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273#issuecomment-164113472
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273#issuecomment-164113471
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273#issuecomment-164113454
**[Test build #47609 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47609/consoleFull)**
for PR 10273 at commit
[`9320bf8`](https://g
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10160
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9957
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10257
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10271
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273#issuecomment-164112268
**[Test build #47609 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47609/consoleFull)**
for PR 10273 at commit
[`9320bf8`](https://gi
Github user ygcao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#issuecomment-164112022
update codes:
1. passed lint-scala check by adding spaces and cut comment line lengths
2. removed distance functions as we discussed, including the existing
zombie
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10268#issuecomment-16490
LGTM except minor issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10268#discussion_r47427436
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tuning.py ---
@@ -151,9 +154,11 @@ def __init__(self, estimator=None,
estimatorParamMaps=None, evaluator=None, numF
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10268#discussion_r47427431
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tuning.py ---
@@ -129,9 +130,11 @@ class CrossValidator(Estimator):
numFolds = Param(Params._dummy(), "numFolds", "num
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9957#issuecomment-164110737
@jkbradley Would you mind to check the merging status of this PR? I did not
found it merging into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10160#issuecomment-164110535
Sorry @gatorsmile -- I missed this PR for a couple of days. LGTM. Merging
this to master and `branch-1.6`. Regarding whether this will make 1.6 release,
it depends on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10275#issuecomment-164110412
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10275#issuecomment-164110404
**[Test build #47608 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47608/consoleFull)**
for PR 10275 at commit
[`6e463fd`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10275#issuecomment-164110414
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10261#issuecomment-164110300
I see. However, for 1.6, we still need to support Akka RPC. Is it possible
to get the client address from `ActorRef`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-164110115
@felixcheung Was there a migration guide entry for `withColumn` changing in
Scala / Python. If so, we can also add one to a SparkR migration guide. At a
high level, ad
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10275#issuecomment-164109994
**[Test build #47608 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47608/consoleFull)**
for PR 10275 at commit
[`6e463fd`](https://gi
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10275
[SPARK-12300][SQL][PYSPARK] fix schmea inferance on local collections
Current schema inference for local python collections halts as soon as
there are no NullTypes. This is different than when we s
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10272#issuecomment-164108452
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10272#issuecomment-164108453
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10272#issuecomment-164108430
**[Test build #47606 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47606/consoleFull)**
for PR 10272 at commit
[`ddb26da`](https://g
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10261#issuecomment-164107825
> I saw your following comment...But I don't get it.
That's because we took opposite approaches. Your PR's approach is "if this
connection says the sender addres
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273#issuecomment-164107812
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273#issuecomment-164107811
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273#issuecomment-164107677
**[Test build #47607 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47607/consoleFull)**
for PR 10273 at commit
[`d93c55a`](https://g
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273#discussion_r47426529
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/BasicAuthFilter.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273#discussion_r47426522
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/BasicAuthFilter.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10274#issuecomment-164106136
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273#issuecomment-164105914
**[Test build #47607 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47607/consoleFull)**
for PR 10273 at commit
[`d93c55a`](https://gi
GitHub user iyounus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10274
[SPARK-12230][ML] WeightedLeastSquares.fit() should handle division by zero
properly if standard deviation of target variable is zero.
This fixes the behavior of WeightedLeastSquars.fit() when the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10272#issuecomment-164105692
**[Test build #47606 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47606/consoleFull)**
for PR 10272 at commit
[`ddb26da`](https://gi
GitHub user Lewuathe opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273
[SPARK-12302] Example for basic authentication filter used by spark.uâ¦
â¦i.filters
Although `spark.ui.filters` configuration uses simple servlet filter, it is
often difficult to unders
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10272
[SPARK-9578] [ML] Stemmer feature transformer
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9578
Classical Porter stemmer, which is implemented referring to scalanlp/chalk
*
[[http
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9936#issuecomment-164105183
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9936#issuecomment-164105185
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9936#issuecomment-164105160
**[Test build #47605 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47605/consoleFull)**
for PR 9936 at commit
[`5b4c500`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9936#issuecomment-164104527
**[Test build #47605 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47605/consoleFull)**
for PR 9936 at commit
[`5b4c500`](https://gith
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10271#issuecomment-164104457
Thanks! Merging to master and branch 1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ankurdave commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9470#discussion_r47425842
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -620,6 +608,32 @@ class DataFrame private[sql](
}
/**
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10271#issuecomment-164103776
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10271#issuecomment-164103777
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10271#issuecomment-164103738
**[Test build #47603 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47603/consoleFull)**
for PR 10271 at commit
[`d9f8c25`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9936#issuecomment-164103662
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9936#issuecomment-164103622
**[Test build #47604 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47604/consoleFull)**
for PR 9936 at commit
[`3b02d4e`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9936#issuecomment-164103661
**[Test build #47604 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47604/consoleFull)**
for PR 9936 at commit
[`3b02d4e`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9936#issuecomment-164103663
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user Lewuathe commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9936#issuecomment-164102964
@yanboliang I made test code to avoid recreation of datasets.
Could you check again please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10267#issuecomment-164100820
I am not sure if that patch solves this problem. As there is still the bug
[reported](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34065209/java-util-concurrent-rejectedexecutionex
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10267
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9957#issuecomment-164096401
I don't have any comments; it LGTM
I ran it locally, and it worked fine.
Merging with master and branch-1.6
Thanks for the PR!
---
If your projec
Github user dusenberrymw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9458#issuecomment-164095361
Great, thanks @jkbradley!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9957#issuecomment-164095322
Reviewing now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10205#issuecomment-164094852
> IIRC there was a similar patch you wrote a while ago that was shot down
for some reason
Yes. That patch tried to centralize all config key definitions in
`Sp
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10201#issuecomment-164094104
SQL and MLlib have a "Migration guide" section, perhaps something like
that?
http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/sql-programming-guide.html#migration-guide
In f
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10267#issuecomment-164092733
Yes, I forgot about that patch. This should not be a problem anymore, and
this isn't the correct fix even if it is. @viirya would you mind closing this?
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10271#issuecomment-164092361
**[Test build #47603 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47603/consoleFull)**
for PR 10271 at commit
[`d9f8c25`](https://gi
GitHub user ankurdave opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10271
[SPARK-12298][SQL] Fix infinite loop in DataFrame.sortWithinPartitions
Modifies the String overload to call the Column overload and ensures this
is called in a test.
You can merge this pull requ
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10269#issuecomment-164089518
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10269#issuecomment-164089519
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10269#issuecomment-164089453
**[Test build #47602 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47602/consoleFull)**
for PR 10269 at commit
[`e96556e`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10228#issuecomment-164089027
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10228#issuecomment-164089106
**[Test build #2212 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2212/consoleFull)**
for PR 10228 at commit
[`71e0b1c`](https://
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10228#issuecomment-164089028
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10228#issuecomment-164088946
**[Test build #47601 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47601/consoleFull)**
for PR 10228 at commit
[`71e0b1c`](https://g
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#discussion_r47421414
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkStrategies.scala ---
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ private[sql] abstract class SparkStrate
Github user proflin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10264#issuecomment-164087083
Thanks @zsxwing for reviewing so soon :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164086130
The failure seems not related to this change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10269#issuecomment-164085630
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10228#issuecomment-164085613
**[Test build #2211 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2211/consoleFull)**
for PR 10228 at commit
[`740e725`](https://
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10269#issuecomment-164085631
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10269#issuecomment-164085553
**[Test build #47593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47593/consoleFull)**
for PR 10269 at commit
[`bedaead`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10130#issuecomment-164085089
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10130#issuecomment-164085087
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10130#issuecomment-164084957
**[Test build #47594 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47594/consoleFull)**
for PR 10130 at commit
[`219d75c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-164084776
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-164084775
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-164084728
**[Test build #47596 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47596/consoleFull)**
for PR 5423 at commit
[`e134e29`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-164084086
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-164084088
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-164083850
**[Test build #47595 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47595/consoleFull)**
for PR 8744 at commit
[`fe0c7b7`](https://git
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10160#issuecomment-164082851
@shivaram Will it be merged before the release of 1.6? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10215#issuecomment-164081626
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10215#issuecomment-164081631
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10215#issuecomment-164081248
**[Test build #47597 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47597/consoleFull)**
for PR 10215 at commit
[`48e049b`](https://g
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10257#issuecomment-164081063
Merging with master and branch-1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10235#issuecomment-164080820
CC @thunterdb Could you please check this? The content should be OK since
@mengxr verified it previously.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10247#discussion_r47417343
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/rows.scala
---
@@ -211,6 +211,18 @@ class GenericRowWithSchema(values: Arra
Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10247#discussion_r47417301
--- Diff: sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Row.scala ---
@@ -325,6 +341,14 @@ trait Row extends Serializable {
def getAs[T](i: Int): T
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164074635
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164074632
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10265#issuecomment-164074515
**[Test build #47592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47592/consoleFull)**
for PR 10265 at commit
[`1b8d570`](https://g
1 - 100 of 337 matches
Mail list logo
