Github user SongYadong commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836
I'm sorry for the scala style checks failure, i will read scala style guide
doc again.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21830
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21830
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93425/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21830
**[Test build #93425 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93425/testReport)**
for PR 21830 at commit
[`30d08ca`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93432/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836
**[Test build #93432 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93432/testReport)**
for PR 21836 at commit
[`085ffdb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836
**[Test build #93432 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93432/testReport)**
for PR 21836 at commit
[`085ffdb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/08
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836
test this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93428/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764
**[Test build #93428 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93428/testReport)**
for PR 21764 at commit
[`39b6ce9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SongYadong commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836#discussion_r204290930
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
filterOpt: Opti
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21474
retest this please
--
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional c
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836#discussion_r204290224
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
filterOpt: Opt
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21474
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21822
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93420/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r204289193
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetSchemaPruning.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+/*
+ * L
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21822
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21822
**[Test build #93420 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93420/testReport)**
for PR 21822 at commit
[`38980ad`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21474
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21474
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93423/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21474
**[Test build #93423 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93423/testReport)**
for PR 21474 at commit
[`61e1991`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r204288547
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetSchemaPruningSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r204288381
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/SelectedFieldSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,388 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r204288233
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetSchemaPruning.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+/*
+ * L
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21775
**[Test build #93431 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93431/testReport)**
for PR 21775 at commit
[`76a34c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/76
Github user sujith71955 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21775#discussion_r204287713
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1843,6 +1843,7 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
#
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21839
@xuanyuanking Could you add an end-to-end test into
ScriptTransformationSuite to verify the results?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21839#discussion_r204286954
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -450,13 +450,16 @@ object ColumnPruning extends Rul
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21845
**[Test build #93430 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93430/testReport)**
for PR 21845 at commit
[`7afc5c5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21845
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1230/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21845
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21123
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93422/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21123
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21123
**[Test build #93422 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93422/testReport)**
for PR 21123 at commit
[`5ed7854`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user sujith71955 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21775#discussion_r204286227
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1843,6 +1843,7 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
#
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21845
**[Test build #93429 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93429/testReport)**
for PR 21845 at commit
[`c57b745`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21845
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1229/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21845
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21775#discussion_r204285948
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -114,7 +114,10 @@ case class CatalogTablePartition(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21775#discussion_r204285853
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1843,6 +1843,7 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
##
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21845
[SPARK-24886][INFRA] Fix the testing script to increase timeout for Jenkins
build (from 300m to 350m)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, looks we hit the ti
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21845
cc @rxin
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@sp
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21775
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21775
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93421/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21775
**[Test build #93421 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93421/testReport)**
for PR 21775 at commit
[`140c4ce`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764
LGTM, too
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93419/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764
**[Test build #93419 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93419/testReport)**
for PR 21764 at commit
[`87afe4f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764
LGTM pending Jenkins
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: revi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764
**[Test build #93428 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93428/testReport)**
for PR 21764 at commit
[`39b6ce9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/39
Github user hthuynh2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21653
@tgravescs Can you please run the test again, thank you.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1228/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user maryannxue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764#discussion_r204279843
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -175,6 +191,41 @@ abstract class Optimizer(sessionC
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21653
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21653
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93418/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21653
**[Test build #93418 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93418/testReport)**
for PR 21653 at commit
[`b6585da`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764#discussion_r204278968
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -175,6 +191,41 @@ abstract class Optimizer(sessionC
Github user httfighter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21826
I have a suggestion that I don't know if it is reasonable.
In our spark, since we already support âÂÂ||â as a string concatenation
function, I don't know if we can make such an improve
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21830#discussion_r204277225
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -1244,46 +1244,50 @@ case class Reverse(ch
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21772
@liutang123 Thanks for this work. I'm curious that if this is an actual
problem you hit in real application, or you just think it is problematic?
---
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21772#discussion_r204276973
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashedRelationSuite.scala
---
@@ -278,6 +278,39 @@ class HashedRelationSuite extends
Github user httfighter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21826
I did the following tests in mysql.
mysql> select "abc" || "def";
++
| "abc" || "def" |
++
| 0
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21772#discussion_r204276886
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashedRelation.scala
---
@@ -770,8 +771,10 @@ private[execution] final class LongToUn
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21772#discussion_r204276788
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashedRelation.scala
---
@@ -726,9 +726,10 @@ private[execution] final class LongToUn
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802#discussion_r204276502
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CollectionExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -1419,4 +1421,71 @@ class Collection
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93427/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836
**[Test build #93427 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93427/testReport)**
for PR 21836 at commit
[`6a0f729`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836
**[Test build #93427 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93427/testReport)**
for PR 21836 at commit
[`6a0f729`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6a
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: review
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21836
test this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21440
cc @squito @mridulm @markhamstra @jerryshao @vanzin @JoshRosen @rxin
@zsxwing
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21440
Although the code quality is pretty good, I am still afraid it could
introduce some unexpected issues. Is that possible we can introduce a conf to
fall back to the previous implementation? We can
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21830#discussion_r204275800
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -1244,46 +1244,50 @@ case class Reverse(ch
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802#discussion_r204275498
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CollectionExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -1419,4 +1421,71 @@ class Collection
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764
Also, can you update the title? You need to at least add `[SQL]` in the
title: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764#issuecomment-405832763
---
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21764#discussion_r204275071
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -175,6 +191,41 @@ abstract class Optimizer(sessionCatal
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21784
Logging is already configurable; a switch is overkill. This seems fine.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.ap
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21439#discussion_r204274790
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +102,17 @@ class JacksonParser(
}
Github user liutang123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21772
@viirya Hi, Could you have more time to review this PR?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user httfighter commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21826#discussion_r204274497
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -442,8 +442,6 @@ case class Or(left: Expression,
Github user httfighter commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21826#discussion_r204274481
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -442,8 +442,6 @@ case class Or(left: Expression,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21784
Adding a configuration to control some logs sounds an overkill. I wouldn't
go for this way.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: re
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20699
**[Test build #93426 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93426/testReport)**
for PR 20699 at commit
[`be96e39`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/be
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21784
We need to listen to @vanzin opinion.
Because the relevant code is what he wrote.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: review
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21828
@woodthom2, if you have some plans to update this PR quite soon, please see
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html and proceed. Otherwise, I would
suggest to leave this closed so that active
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21844
I don't think we should as discussed in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21784. I think this PR would better be
left closed and go discuss there.
---
-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21844
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21844
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21844
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user hejiefang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21844
Spark 24873
[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24873](url)
I think it is better to add a switch to increase a switch to shielding
frequent interaction reports with yarn.
You can m
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21784
It has never been printed before, right? I think we can consider to turn it
on specifically for spark-submit applications for some spark-submit
applications although I am not fully sure if it's
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21784
But for some spark-submit applications, I want these Application report for
information.
What should I do?
---
-
To
Github user cuijunyao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21843
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21843
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21843
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
