Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13419
I will prefer refreshing the dataset every time a dataset is reloaded but
keeping existing ones unchanged.
~~~scala
val df1 = sqlContext.read.parquet(dir).cache()
df1.count() /
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13419
@dongjoon-hyun no reason; old habits. I'll fix this. Thanks! :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13419
Hi, @sameeragarwal .
Is there any reason to use `SQLContext` instead of `SparkSession` in this
PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13419
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59668/
Test FAILed.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13419
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13419
**[Test build #59668 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59668/consoleFull)**
for PR 13419 at commit
[`ee631d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13419#discussion_r65251560
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -67,6 +67,28 @@ class ParquetQuery
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13419#discussion_r65251574
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -67,6 +67,28 @@ class ParquetQuery
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13419
@yhuai @mengxr what are your thoughts on this approach?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13419
**[Test build #59668 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59668/consoleFull)**
for PR 13419 at commit
[`ee631d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/c
GitHub user sameeragarwal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13419
[SPARK-15678][SQL] Drop cache on appends and overwrites
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkSQL currently doesn't drop caches if the underlying data is
overwritt
11 matches
Mail list logo