If we have options 1 or 3, we are saying that the RIPE chair is a
full-time position -- is that a statement we're all comfortable
making? (Hans Petter, I would love to hear your view about how much
time your responsibilities take, throughout the year)
I think #1 would entail a large raising of RI
I too am inclined towards a variant of option 3.
- option 1 to me is simply too much heavyweight structure for a single-
person role.
- option 2 I feel is exclusionary to otherwise well-matched candidates,
and places the role at risk of capture by employer vested interests.
On 02/20/18 06:25
Alexander Isavnin wrote:
>
> Support Option 2.
>
> Option 1 could move RIPE Community to uncomfortable lands of formalized
> organization, with unspecific for responsibilities Community
>
> Option 3 might cause conflicts of interests, making RIPE Chair dependent on a
> bad will of NCC's board
On 19/02/2018 16:51, Nigel Titley wrote:
I vote for option 3.
-Hank
> At the last Executive board meeting I took an action to start a
> discussion on the RIPE-list about the notion of remuneration for the
> RIPE Chair.
>
> We were fortunate that Rob B had an employer who didn't mind him
> devot
Hi Nigel,
Thanks for your email.
I think there might also be a 4rd option where there is a bit more distance to
the RIPE NCC and the said RIPE Chair.
And that could be to appoint / employ him in the Rob Blokzijl foundation.
There is already an agreed way of working between the 2 entities
Support Option 2.
Option 1 could move RIPE Community to uncomfortable lands of formalized
organization, with unspecific for responsibilities Community
Option 3 might cause conflicts of interests, making RIPE Chair dependent on a
bad will of NCC's board or management.
Kind regards,
Alexander
At the last Executive board meeting I took an action to start a
discussion on the RIPE-list about the notion of remuneration for the
RIPE Chair.
We were fortunate that Rob B had an employer who didn't mind him
devoting unlimited amounts of time to the RIPE community. Now that Rob
is no longer with
