Hello Bonno,
Friday, May 26, 2006, 10:41:11 AM, you wrote:
> Hi Pete,
>> Watch out for today's spam storm -- it's a lot bigger than we've seen
>> in a long while. 48 hour image attached.
> This has low priority but. I've tried to find a live version of that
> graph you've sent but I cannot
Hi Pete,
Watch out for today's spam storm -- it's a lot bigger than we've seen
in a long while. 48 hour image attached.
This has low priority but. I've tried to find a live version of that
graph you've sent but I cannot find it at
http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Message_Sniffer
Hello andyb,
Friday, May 26, 2006, 8:16:02 AM, you wrote:
> Hi Pete,
> Could you be so kind as to include the legend with the graph?
> Otherwise, there are 3 lines that don't mean anything because they are
> undefined.
Sorry for the confusion...
The three lines are all for the same data, but a
Hi Pete,
Could you be so kind as to include the legend with the graph?
Otherwise, there are 3 lines that don't mean anything because they are
undefined.
Thanks,
Andrew Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Friday, May 26, 2006, 8:09:43 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Sniffe
Hello Sniffer Folks,
Watch out for today's spam storm -- it's a lot bigger than we've seen
in a long while. 48 hour image attached.
A large component of this one is a broken spam with an empty subject
and two empty quoted printable segments.
There is a wide variety of other spam mixed in also ho
