This looks like an interesting proposal. A 'black box' with regards to
how the application obtains assoc_handle and signature from the OP
remains, but it looks like a step in the right direction.
What remains to be done to elevate this proposal this to standard?
ons, 16 07 2008 kl. 15:09 +1000,
token
once you're done using the computer.
Again, OAuth appears to me to concern authorized machine _access_ to a
particular resource while I'm asking for machine _authentication_, which
belongs in the realm of OpenID.
--
Anders Feder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ons, 16 07 2008 kl. 13:26 +0800, skrev James
.
--
Anders Feder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
, skrev Scott Kveton:
Hi Anders,
You might want to check out OAuth ... it was developed for just such a
situation.
- Scott
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Anders Feder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
There have been some discussion over the years about using OpenID for
non
,
You might want to check out OAuth ... it was developed for just such a
situation.
- Scott
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Anders Feder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
There have been some discussion over the years about using OpenID for
non
,
Anders Feder
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
. As far as I can see, the wheel more or less has to be reinvented
each time someone wish to exchange attribute references (unless someone
outside OpenID standardize the exchange process).
Regards,
Anders Feder
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http
to relativistic physics - but very
often quantum mechanics is overkill.
Regards,
Anders Feder
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
and it will work. I just
think there will be corner cases where the user is not able to 'change
course' in time. And handling corner cases sets excellent technology
apart from very good technology - but it will work.
Regards,
Anders Feder
___
specs
