On 04/18/2016 12:39 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
On 04/18/2016 12:22 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (18/04/16 11:14), Michal Židek wrote:
On 04/18/2016 10:39 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/12/15 17:10), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi!
I saw some integration tests failures recently,
and I think there is
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:54:10PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 12:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Thanks, IIRC the int-instead of enum use is intentional, I will look
> > at the others.
>
> The last coverity/clang thing is a false positive, but I initialized
> reply to NULL an
On 04/19/2016 08:18 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 04/18/2016 04:04 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 04/15/2016 09:54 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
Hi, CI fails on debian:
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/41/53/debian_testing/ci.html
Hi,
CI tests passed locally.
Moderate CI tests passed too:
http://sssd-ci.d
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 09:59:57AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:54:10PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 12:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > Thanks, IIRC the int-instead of enum use is intentional, I will look
> > > at the others.
> >
> > The last cove
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:32:59AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > From 0dff46755af6063ed4b0339020ae5bb686692de1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Simo Sorce
> > > Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 20:13:28 -0500
> > > Subject: [PATCH 02/15] Server: Enable Watchdog in all daemons
> > >
> > > This allows
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:54:10PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 12:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Thanks, IIRC the int-instead of enum use is intentional, I will look
> > at the others.
>
> The last coverity/clang thing is a false positive, but I initialized
> reply to NULL an
Hi Pavel,
can you check if this is the right thing to do for methods that parse
arguments on their own?
To reproduce, it was enough to run:
sudo dbus-send --print-reply --system
--dest=org.freedesktop.sssd.infopipe /org/freedesktop/sssd/infopipe
org.freedesktop.sssd.infopipe.GetUserAt
Hi,
I just updated the design for the planned sss_confcheck tool.
It can be found here:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/ConfigCheckTool
For convenience I paste it here as well:
sss_confcheck tool
Related ticket(s):
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2269
Problem state
On 04/18/2016 10:34 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
I use special local user for building srpms in mock
and it caused failures for me with running integration tests.
Attached patch is a workaround. The proper solution would be to wrap
detection of active users in CWRAP enviroment.
LS
Hi Luk
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:04:23PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated the design for the planned sss_confcheck tool.
> It can be found here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/ConfigCheckTool
>
> For convenience I paste it here as well:
>
>
> sss_confcheck tool
>
On (20/04/16 12:36), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 04/18/2016 10:34 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> I use special local user for building srpms in mock
>> and it caused failures for me with running integration tests.
>>
>> Attached patch is a workaround. The proper solution would be to wrap
>> d
On 04/20/2016 11:56 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi Pavel,
can you check if this is the right thing to do for methods that parse
arguments on their own?
To reproduce, it was enough to run:
sudo dbus-send --print-reply --system
--dest=org.freedesktop.sssd.infopipe /org/freedesktop/sssd/info
On 04/20/2016 12:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (20/04/16 12:36), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 04/18/2016 10:34 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>ehlo,
>>
>>I use special local user for building srpms in mock
>>and it caused failures for me with running integration tests.
>>
>>Attached patch is a workarou
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:54:10PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 12:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Thanks, IIRC the int-instead of enum use is intentional, I will look
> > at the others.
>
> The last coverity/clang thing is a false positive, but I initialized
> reply to NULL an
On 04/20/2016 02:16 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
+for (num = 0, i = 0; i < res->count; i++) {
>+const struct ldb_val *val;
>+char *name;
>+int n;
>+int j;
Every time I see variables declared in a scope in C except loop control
variables I think "This should be a
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 11:12 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:32:59AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > > From 0dff46755af6063ed4b0339020ae5bb686692de1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Simo Sorce
> > > > Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 20:13:28 -0500
> > > > Subject: [PATCH 02/15
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 11:55 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:54:10PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 12:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > Thanks, IIRC the int-instead of enum use is intentional, I will look
> > > at the others.
> >
> > The last coverity/cl
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 14:16 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:54:10PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 12:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > Thanks, IIRC the int-instead of enum use is intentional, I will look
> > > at the others.
> >
> > The last coverity/cl
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 09:43:05AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 11:12 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:32:59AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > > > From 0dff46755af6063ed4b0339020ae5bb686692de1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > > From: Simo Sorce
> > > >
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 09:57:03AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 11:55 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:54:10PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 12:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > Thanks, IIRC the int-instead of enum use is intenti
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 09:59:19AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 14:16 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:54:10PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 12:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > Thanks, IIRC the int-instead of enum use is intenti
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 17:18 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 09:43:05AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 11:12 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:32:59AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > > > > From 0dff46755af6063ed4b0339020ae5bb686692d
On (20/04/16 08:39), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 04/19/2016 07:24 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> there is little simple patch which fix the typo.
>>
>
>Hello,
>
>I wrote better commit message and I added to patch set with
>
OK, I marked this thread as supperseeded in patchwork
LS
On (20/04/16 08:41), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 04/19/2016 01:55 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found a strange condition in the function sss_ncache_check_str().
>>
>> This condition causes the cache is NOT checked and the result of
>> checking is automatically EEXIST.
>>
>> I dind't find call of
On (20/04/16 17:21), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 09:59:19AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 14:16 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:54:10PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> > > On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 12:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> > > > Thank
On (20/04/16 19:52), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (20/04/16 08:41), Petr Cech wrote:
>>On 04/19/2016 01:55 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I found a strange condition in the function sss_ncache_check_str().
>>>
>>> This condition causes the cache is NOT checked and the result of
>>> checking i
On (20/04/16 10:18), Pavel Březina wrote:
>On 04/19/2016 08:18 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
>> On 04/18/2016 04:04 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
>> > On 04/15/2016 09:54 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
>> > > Hi, CI fails on debian:
>> > > http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/41/53/debian_testing/ci.html
>> >
>> > Hi,
>>
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 19:58 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (20/04/16 17:21), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 09:59:19AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 14:16 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:54:10PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> > >
28 matches
Mail list logo