Styling. Looks like I've got something mixed up.20.11.2017, 21:28, "Evgeny Khramtsov" :Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:34:52 +0500Konstantin Kozlov wrote: It's too bad you didn't use your veto against that awful proto.Which proto do you mean?___Sta
I was talking about "Styling" only. "Markup" is an interesting thing, but I think it's too weak right now. At least image embedding needs to be added to make it possible to replace XEP-0071 with it.20.11.2017, 19:58, "Dave Cridland" :On 20 November 2017 at 16:34, Konstantin Kozlov
Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:34:52 +0500
Konstantin Kozlov wrote:
> It's too bad you didn't use your veto against that awful proto.
Which proto do you mean?
___
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standar
On 20 November 2017 at 16:34, Konstantin Kozlov wrote:
> It's too bad you didn't use your veto against that awful proto.
> It don't even worth to waste XEP number for things like this one.
Wait - which one did you want us to veto? Both? Neither?
___
Sta
It's too bad you didn't use your veto against that awful proto.It don't even worth to waste XEP number for things like this one.___
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017, at 10:49, JC Brand wrote:
> 2. Vote on accepting the "Markup" ProtoXEP
>
> * Link Mauve: +1
> * daniel: +1
> * dwd: +1
>
> Tobias and SamWhited will vote via the mailing list.
-0
The more I think about this protoxep the more I think it's not a
direction we want to go. If th
Hi,
My votes are inline.
> On 8. Nov 2017, at 17:49, JC Brand wrote:
>
> 2017-11-08 XSF Council Minutes
> ==
>
> Chat Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2017-11-08
>
> Chair:
>
> * Emmanuel Gil Peyrot (Link Mauve)
>
> Present:
>
> * Sam Whited (SamWhited)
> * D
On Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 21:55:54 CET goffi wrote:
> Le 2017-11-08 20:20, Jonas Wielicki a écrit :
> > On Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 20:02:24 CET Goffi wrote:
> >> I was in favor of making formatting characters mandatory in styling,
> >> but if
> >> there is markup and attribute, I think it's
Le 2017-11-08 20:20, Jonas Wielicki a écrit :
On Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 20:02:24 CET Goffi wrote:
I was in favor of making formatting characters mandatory in styling,
but if
there is markup and attribute, I think it's not needed anymore.
It is, for clients not supporting markup at all.
On Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 20:02:24 CET Goffi wrote:
> I was in favor of making formatting characters mandatory in styling, but if
> there is markup and attribute, I think it's not needed anymore.
It is, for clients not supporting markup at all.
kind regards,
Jonas
signature.asc
Description
Le mercredi 8 novembre 2017, 17:56:26 CET Jonas Wielicki a écrit :
> On Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 17:49:26 CET JC Brand wrote:
> > jonasw asks that the previously rejected ProtoXEP "Body Markup Hints" be
> > reconsidered as a means to bridge the above two ProtoXEPs.
> >
> > https://xmpp.org/exten
Am 8. November 2017 17:56:26 MEZ schrieb Jonas Wielicki :
>On Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 17:49:26 CET JC Brand wrote:
>> jonasw asks that the previously rejected ProtoXEP "Body Markup Hints"
>be
>> reconsidered as a means to bridge the above two ProtoXEPs.
>>
>> https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox
On Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 17:49:26 CET JC Brand wrote:
> jonasw asks that the previously rejected ProtoXEP "Body Markup Hints" be
> reconsidered as a means to bridge the above two ProtoXEPs.
>
> https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/bmh.html
Sorry, to correct: This is not what I said (or at least
2017-11-08 XSF Council Minutes
==
Chat Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2017-11-08
Chair:
* Emmanuel Gil Peyrot (Link Mauve)
Present:
* Sam Whited (SamWhited)
* Dave Cridland (dwd)
* Daniel Gultsch (daniel)
* Tobias Markmann (Tobias)
Minute taker:
* JC Brand (
14 matches
Mail list logo