On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 1:40 AM Alex Perez wrote:
>
> There's a fixed Fedora 35 SoaS ISO at
> http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-F35-20220211.iso
> which I have confirmed is working as expected.
>
> The above ISO is 1.2 gigabytes in size.
Great, do we know why/how this s
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:42 PM Alex Perez wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Fedora 34 was released today, which means that we've got a new release
> of Sugar on a Stick 34, which includes Sugar 0.118, and can be
> downloaded from:
>
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/34/Spins/x86_64/is
> This is a call for testing of the upcoming Fedora 34 based Sugar on a Stick,
> which is now ready for testing on the following platforms:
>
> For 64-bit PCs, the ISO can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/34_Beta-1.3/Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-34_Bet
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:56 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam
wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> SOAS was failing to build in F34 due to telepathy-salut being deprecated and
> needed as a dependency in sugar, F33 beta had an issue where startup goes
> straight to login.
>
> Both have been fixed after today's comp
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:11 PM Alex Perez wrote:
>
>
> Fedora 32 has been released, and the Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick spin is
> available for download from https://bit.ly/F32-SoAS-x86_64-ISO. It is 950
> megabytes in size.
>
> The 32-bit Fedora SoaS ARM image, suitable for use on Raspberry Pi
> Fedora 32 has entered beta state, and the Sugar on a Stick beta ISO (size is
> 1 gigabyte) can be downloaded from http://bit.ly/SoaS-F32-Beta-ISO
>
> One known issue is that the IRC activity fails to start, and can not be used,
> as it's not yet been ported to Python 3.
There's currently 4 Act
> > > > > Log (41) - Fails on start-up with AttributeError, [...]
> > > > Sounds like you have a Fedora specific error to diagnose. [...]
> > >
> > > As far as I can see all those deps are there.
> > >
> > > I see the following crash:
> > >
> > > Traceback (most recent call last): [...]
> > > Fil
> > > > Log (41) - Fails on start-up with AttributeError, [...]
> > > Sounds like you have a Fedora specific error to diagnose. [...]
> >
> > As far as I can see all those deps are there.
> >
> > I see the following crash:
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last): [...]
> > File "/usr/share/suga
> > Log (41) - Fails on start-up with AttributeError, ideally should be
> > ported to python 3.
>
> No, v41 is Python 3 already, and should work. Does work on Ubuntu
> 20.04 beta. Sounds like you have a Fedora specific error to diagnose.
>
> The dependencies are unusual for this activity; check y
-, I'd like to know
> how applying patches works. Thanks.
How do you apply patches without packaging?
Please read the Fedora docs on packaging:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:10 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>
ng him and
said he would fix them pre-beta and I've since had radio silence
since. This has other implications because I will need assistance in
the move to python3 from a packaging PoV as I really don't have the
time any more to do this all on my own.
Peter
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:
Hi All,
Just a reminder we're in final freeze for Fedora 31, I'm assuming
people are testing it.
Just a reminder you can get the latest nightly composes here:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-31/compose/Spins/x86_64/iso/
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/
gt;
> Thanks. Interesting.
>
> > Forwarded Message
> > Subject: Re: Packages in Fedora
> >Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:02:59 +0100
> >From: Peter Robinson
> > To: Alex Perez
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > > Thanks for reaching out. I am
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:16 PM Alex Perez wrote:
>
> James Cameron wrote on 5/19/19 3:50 PM:
> > That's unfortunate.
> Agreed, but it was due to a lack of testing.
> >
> > Were the Fedora 30 ARM builds being tested before release?
> They were, but only in QEMU, it would seem. The temporary workar
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:07 PM Walter Bender wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:58 AM Alex Perez wrote:
>>
>> The Fedora 30 release was earlier today, and with it comes the Fedora 30
>> Sugar on a Stick environment, which now has functional collaboration, out of
>> the box. It includes
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:28 PM Alex Perez wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
>
> Just under the wire, we have managed to get some critical Sugar on a Stick
> issues fixed, which are now included in Fedora 30 SoaS images. I would like
> to extend a very special thanks to Peter Robinson,
You might want to check the local firewall ports
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:09 PM Samson Goddy wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We've been working on installing SOAS on some computers in a school and we
> were testing collaboration using CAT5 cables connected to a router
> and also connected to the two
Have you applied all the latest updates to Fedora, a number of issues have
been fixed with Fedora 29 updates.
Peter
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 8:52 AM Samson Goddy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ibiam and I are currently working to install Sugar in the classroom, so we
> decided to download Soas 32-bit versi
Hey James,
Happy New Year!
> > > > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and
> > > > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities
> > > > >> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here.
> > > > >> Are there any plans to
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:41 PM James Cameron wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:23:44PM -0500, Frederick Grose wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:03 PM Thomas Gilliard
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Helpsoas is not building in fedora30 rawhide
> >
> > The livemedia.log shows this error report
> > > There is a glitch observed in SoaS 29.
> > > https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4990
> >
> > Seems it might use NetworkManager-glib and that appears to have been
> > retired and we didn't have an explicitly dependency on it. I'm not
> > 100% sure that is the case but we might need to change ho
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:11 PM Frederick Grose wrote:
>
> There is a glitch observed in SoaS 29.
> https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4990
Seems it might use NetworkManager-glib and that appears to have been
retired and we didn't have an explicitly dependency on it. I'm not
100% sure that is the
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > What's the status of the 0.113/114 releases? I'd like to start to
> > > > working on the python3 builds for Fedora 30 sooner rather than
> > > > later.
> > >
> &g
> > What's the status of the 0.113/114 releases? I'd like to start to
> > working on the python3 builds for Fedora 30 sooner rather than
> > later.
>
> Stalled on sugar-toolkit-gtk3 port from static to PyGObject
> introspection for Telepathy.
>
> There's still no Python 3 support for the static bin
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:00:11PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and
> > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities
> > >> that still depend on it
>> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and
>> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities
>> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here.
>> Are there any plans to move them to gst1?
>
> They were moved. Check the release an
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:43 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:26:21PM +0800, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:18 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Peter,
>> >
>> > 1) Clock and Record have been ported to gst1.0
>> >
>> > 2) There a
Hello All,
This is intended to ask questions and seek feedback.
I've not really had time to deal with Sugar for some time, but it also
doesn't tend to take up a lot of time so it's not been a major
problem, we glue it together when it breaks etc.
Kalpa has done a good job keeping most of the Act
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:00 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:31:39PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> We're in Beta freeze for Fedora 28.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Our How To install Sugar on Fedora is here;
> https://github.com/sugarlabs/sug
Hi All,
We're in Beta freeze for Fedora 28. We have Sugar 0.112, there's
nightly images for the various architectures at the URLs below. Please
test so we don't end up in a situation like last cycle where people
were testing at the last moment before release.
http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:50 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, James Cameron wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >> On Thu,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:19 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> Everybody is talking not listening. Listen up. ;-)
>
> Frederick showed traceback from shell.log which said
> viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing.
>
> viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing from sugar-0.110.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm
>
> viewhelp_webkit2.py wa
be useful to document though what the
missing functionality is. I suspect some of it might just come out of
the box with some of the newer gst 1 functionality though.
Peter
> -walter
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> FYI. We'll likely nee
FYI. We'll likely need these converted over in the F-26 cycle or drop
them. I think the hardest to migrate would be record.
sugar-clock
sugar-memorize
sugar-record
sugar-speak
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael Cronenworth
Date: Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:06 PM
Subject: Call to re
Hi All,
Fedora 24 Alpha is out with sugar 0.108.1 in SoaS.
Please test!
Of particular note of this release we have all the core bits to fix
collaboration so now is the time to fix your Activity and release a
new version (with tar ball please!) so we can finally put this issue
to bed. What would
ersion of Turtle Art available in a week
> or two as well. One less activity dependent on GTK2 and GST0.10
Excellent! Then just about 2 left after that.
BTW can we have BB-8 support in Turtle Art?
https://sixcolors.com/post/2015/12/the-best-christmas-gift-in/
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at
> I am pleased to announce the release of Sugar 0.107.2 (unstable). This
> release means that we have reached the API, UI and Strings freeze deadline
> [1] and that we should focus on making sure there are no missing
> translations or exceptional bugs left.
>
> This release comes with the following
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Martin Abente
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Moving forward with our current development cycle, I am pleased to announce
> the release of Sugar 0.107.1 (unstable). This release means that we have
> officially passed the time [1] for including new features and that we
All activities need to be ported, and there will be a very small
> toolkit change. The toolkit change has not yet landed.
Is it still planned for 0.107?
> Thanks,
> Sam
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> >
Hi Martin,
> Moving forward with our current development cycle, I am pleased to announce
> the release of Sugar 0.107.1 (unstable). This release means that we have
> officially passed the time [1] for including new features and that we must
> start focusing on stability and bug fixing.
>
> This re
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Sam P. wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> For porting browse activity, we need upstream changes. Part of them are
> written, but not the bindings. We need a new api to save and restore state.
> I should chase that up at some point.
>
> Otherwise, the port will be very easy.
> As an official kick-off for the 0.108 development cycle [1], we have
> released a new UNSTABLE version of Sugar. This first 0.107.x release
> includes a fair amount of changes and fixes, so please help us testing it!
>
> Tarballs:
> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/suga
Hi All,
This could be the GA release for SoaS, please test.
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_RC2/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-SoaS-x86_64-23-2.iso
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_RC2/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-23-2.iso
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_RC
Hi All,
Fedora 23 Beta RC1 with SoaS is out, the login issue is fixed, please
test test test.
Direct download links:
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_Beta_RC1/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-23_Beta-1.iso
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_Beta_RC1/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Li
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:46 AM, David Leeming
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well my old Toshiba laptop for instance, a Qosmio i7, a few years old but was
> a $2000 laptop when new. On this I can't boot and run SOAS. It never
> completes booting, you go through the name, colour, gender, school grade but
> th
>> So to briefly restate.
>>
>> Problem: Sugar does not start on F23.
>>
>> Diagnosis: the shared library libsugarext.so.0 cannot be loaded,
>> because of a missing symbol, yet the symbol can be found with
>> strings(1).
>>
>> Workaround #1: use F22 packages.
>>
>> Workaround #2: use Martin's packa
answer the reasons and when it's expected it can be fixed.
Peter
> Best,
>
> David Leeming
> Solomon Islands
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> [mailto:sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Peter Robinson
&g
On 4 Sep 2015 00:22, "Martin Abente" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:43 PM, James Cameron wrote:
>>
>> The errors complain of missing symbols;
>>
>> - sugar_event_controller_get_state
>>
>> - acme_volume_alsa_new
>>
>> Which were both added after 0.98.
>>
>> On my F18 test systems, the pa
>> > > Hello everyone,
>> > >
>> > > I rebuilt 0.106.0 packages from fc23 source rpms, for fc22 x86_64.
>> >
>> > So did I using my copr account, what a great tool to build rpms with,
>> > perhaps SL should go back to using it.[1] Easy for testers to enable
>> > with
>> > dnf.
>> >
>> > > It works
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > I rebuilt 0.106.0 packages from fc23 source rpms, for fc22 x86_64.
>>
>> So did I using my copr account, what a great tool to build rpms with,
>> perhaps SL should go back to using it.[1] Easy for testers to enable with
>> dnf.
>>
>> > It works
>> > fine, so it defini
re are changes on alsa or is not available on Soas?
No changes I'm aware of, and it's available.
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>> > Adding Soas mainta
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Adding Soas maintainer Peter Robinson
I'm on the mailing list, you _REALLY_ don't need to add me separately!
>> Urgent Request:
>>
>> SoaS in fedora 23 still is unusable.[1] [2]
>> also dnf install @sug
Hi David,
I'm the SoaS maintainer.
> I want to demonstrate SOAS to teachers in Vanuatu. I would like to be more
> useful, but actually don't have the luxury of time to research these arcane
> technical issues in which I am not an expert. I just want to know, is there a
> version of SOAS that i
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Martin Abente
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am strongly considering to delay the 0.106 release by one week, from June
> 29 to July 6 [1]. The reasons for this delay are:
>
> Aymara translations are very close to be fully completed, _very_ few
> translations are mi
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> I know there have been various board and development meetings for Sugar.
>
> But I would like to propose having an "all-hands" meeting where anyone in
> the Sugar community as well as related groups (deployments, schoolserver,
> etc.) coul
Hi All,
Fedora 22, and by association, Sugar on a Stick 22 is now available.
To go along with the new SoaS release we have a spiffy new site too.
https://spins.fedoraproject.org/en/soas/
Full details about the Fedora 22 release is below.
Thanks to all for their assistance and hard work in this
I think both the actual SoaS 22 and the new site look
really good together!
> Sean
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _Please_consolidate_the_changes_before_send_to_Peter_.
>> >>>
&g
>>>
>>> _Please_consolidate_the_changes_before_send_to_Peter_.
>>>
>> Thanks, Gonzalo, is good advice.
>>
>
> I've just spent two hours manually providing updates. It will be live
> on staging shortly.
>
> Please provide any further updates against that.
Right the new updated content is live on st
touching the host machine's
> hard disk or existing system at all.
>
> #-#
>
> I feel that this is the limit of my ability to achieve consensus.
>
> I have a plain text copy of the above two elements plus Sean's
> proof_reading_corrections, if it is required.
>
>
Hi All,
We're in the last stretch so we're now down to critical fixes. Please
test and let me know ASAP.
Peter
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_RC1/Images/armhfp/Fedora-SoaS-armhfp-22-1-sda.raw.xz
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_RC1/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-SoaS-x86_6
es of the Soas spin.
Done.
Should be there in a couple of hours
> many thanks
> Sean
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> See the post I just sent to the list less than a hour ago :-)
>>
>> Thanks Sean,
>>
>> Peter
>
he_changes_before_send_to_Peter_.
>>>
>>> Peter,
>>> when need this be finished?
>>>
>>> Gonzalo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Peter Robinson
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue,
Sam,
>>
>>
>> _Please_consolidate_the_changes_before_send_to_Peter_.
>>
>>
>> Peter,
>> when need this be finished?
>>
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:34
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Iain Brown Douglas
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 15:00 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >> > Hi Peter,
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:01 PM Peter Robinson
>> >> > wrote:
>&g
>> > Hi Peter,
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:01 PM Peter Robinson
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Iain Brown Douglas
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Thanks, Sean, for the careful proof
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Sam P. wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:01 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Iain Brown Douglas
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks, Sean, for the careful proof reading.
>> >
&g
ither
>> be replacd with simple double parentheses (" ") or the HTML
>> entities “ and ”
>>
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Sean
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Iain Brown Douglas
>> wrote:
>>
t; On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> It's already in process
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Sam P. wrote:
>> > Hi Peter,
>> >
>> > I think Walter send out a good copy [1] with headers - maybe we
y/050190.html
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:09 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Sam Parkinson
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Peter,
>> >
>> > Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >> Hi Sam, Gonzalo et el,
>> >>
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Sam Parkinson wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi Sam, Gonzalo et el,
>>
>> I've worked with the Fedora web team to update it some based partially
>> on Sam's details below.
>>
>> Details
See the post I just sent to the list less than a hour ago :-)
Thanks Sean,
Peter
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
> Hi Tom, Gonzalo had mentioned this, I have a rewrite of the introduction in
> the works and Sam's Activity texts are good. The main issue is explaining
> that SOA
Hi Sam, Gonzalo et el,
I've worked with the Fedora web team to update it some based partially
on Sam's details below.
Details are here:
http://spins.stg.fedoraproject.org/en/soas/
Let me know of any feedback, I personally think it looks really fab!
Peter
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Sam P.
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 1:47 AM, wrote:
> I managed to test Sugar on Fedora 22 release (SoaS 22). Looking good.
>
> However I have not been able to get activities working on collaboration mode
> - memorize, write, record, etc.
>
> Wonder if this is my problem ?
I believe it's due to a change in
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:04 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:28:06AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Samuel Greenfeld
>> wrote:
>> > The obvious counterargument would be that a deployment might want
>> > to
> Ok. I didn't know that.
>
> When I talked with deployments and they ask for Ubuntu,
> and I ask why, what they really want is Long Time Support.
> No deployment change their image more than once a year.
> In fact, change a image is a logistic challenge for most of
> the big/middle size deployment
bz2
> or we can use smaller images.
> Certainly do not have sense use the little space in the xos in this way.
>
> Sam,
> are you taking the images from git or how are you doing?
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
Hi All,
I see there's a new Read 115 release.
What's changed? The tarball has gone from 74K for v114 to 498K for
v115, that's quite a jump!
Peter
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-dev
Hi All,
We're getting to the pointy end of the Fedora 22 release and hence SoaS 22.
Below are links to the latest images. Please test. I've seen there's a
new Read out (why aren't announcement about new Activites going to
list anymore?) but all others should be on latest releases.
I look forward
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> The obvious counterargument would be that a deployment might want to deploy
> your XO-Next (whatever it is) alongside existing XO laptops, allowing all of
> them to have the same configuration.
>From my memory of olpc-os-builder it was ver
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:10 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:19:45AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>> I think we should try make a build using CentOS. I don't know if
>> have all the packages we need, but the rate of change in Fedora was
>> difficult to follow when OLPC had a
>> Are we planning to do anything with Sugar at the Fedora Flock Conference
>> (August 12-15, Rochester NY - www.flocktofedora.org) this year?
>>
>> The call for talks just ended although it might be possible to sneak one
>> in.
>
>
> The call for papers is open until May 2, 2015:
> http://fedorama
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have
>>> found the following problems so far
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have
> found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies worked out:
>
> olpc-library needs to depend on python-jinja2, not python-jinja. The
> olpc-librar
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Martin Abente
wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> A few days ago, I figured out why Sugar collaboration is broken when
> connected to a Jabber server since Fedora 20.
>
> To summarize: since telepathy-gabble 0.17.25, the Tubes API was deprecated
> and removed [1], therefore
>> On 07/04/15 22:47, James Cameron wrote:
>> > The testing scripts can be made available if anybody else would
>> > like to replicate the results.
>>
>> I'd be curious to look at your scripts and try to replicate some
>> results with our builds.
>
> git clone git://dev.laptop.org/users/quozl/test-
Hi All,
The Fedora 22 Beta RC is out, would be great to get some testing on
SoAS/Sugar 0.104
-- Forwarded message --
From: Adam Williamson
Date: Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:04 AM
Subject: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
To: test-annou...@lists.fedora
ll.
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Looking at the GSoC 2015 idea page [1] I'm wondering if it's possible
>> to get some other core items added as part of the sugar core projects?
>>
>> Like:
>> *
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Martin Abente
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> After a few a days of delay [1], I am pleased to announce the the release of
> Sugar 0.104.1.
On their way to F-22+, they should be in F-22 updates-testing tomorrow.
Peter
___
Hi All,
Fedora 22 Alpha is out. Please test SoaS v22 :-)
There's a few minor known issues:
* Obviously 0.104.1 isn't in it just yet [1] :-)
* gabble and salut are missing, to fix: "sudo yum install
telepathy-gabble telepathy-salut" on the command line. This is already
fixed and will be in the nig
Hi All,
Looking at the GSoC 2015 idea page [1] I'm wondering if it's possible
to get some other core items added as part of the sugar core projects?
Like:
* Covert Record to gtk3 / gstreamer 1
* Covert TamTam/Speak etc to CSound 6
Peter
[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2015
_
I normally get them from the QA announcements
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2015-February/125244.html
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> There are any place to get the last link?
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>
I believe there's a TC7 now
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Downloading.
> I think I have a fix for Terminal, will test and release a new version.
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> H
Hi All,
The first compose towards SoaS 22 is out [2][3][4]. I've done some
very basic testing and there's problems even failing to start with the
following Activities:
* Terminal
* Speak
* Pippy
* Ruler
So if someone could look and see why that would be fab!
Also there's a plan to move to Libinp
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Looks like I will not have time to work on Write for a while..
> If anybody want to check, the spec and patches used in the F18 rpm are here
> [1]
> In theory, all the patches should be already on abiword upstream,
> but would be good check.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Sugar Labs Activities
wrote:
> Activity Homepage:
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4029
>
> Sugar Platform:
> 0.82 - 0.102
>
> Download Now:
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/29078/irc-12.xo
>
> Release notes:
> 12
> * Fixed problems with popu
> I am pleased to announce the release of Sugar (sucrose) 0.104.0. This
> release includes new features and bug fixes from Google Code-In and Summer
> of Code students, deployments and community members.
>
> See the release notes:
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.104/Notes
>
> Sources:
>
> http:/
Hi All,
With Fedora/SoaS 21 out for some time I think we have a good and stable release.
Firstly I'd like to thank the awesome test effort to get a large chuck
of testing done and fixes in for the deadline.
Moving forward I'm happy to coordinate and deal with the release
engineering side of thin
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:15 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 02:43:10AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> The sugar toolkit (for both gtk2 and gtk3) uses python-dateutil and
>> they're rebasing it from 1.5 to 2.x, would it be possible for someone
>> t
Hi All,
The sugar toolkit (for both gtk2 and gtk3) uses python-dateutil and
they're rebasing it from 1.5 to 2.x, would it be possible for someone
to review to see if there's any changes needed in the code please?
Peter
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183383
[2] https://bugzilla.
>> > To help with testing it would be nice if RPMS based on these versions
>> > could
>> > be made available via Fedora's updates-testing repo (or maybe koji) for
>> > F20-F21.
>>
>> We've never pushed new major releases of any sort to a stable Fedora
>> release as there's too much QA and testing r
1 - 100 of 768 matches
Mail list logo
