[systemd-devel] [PATCH v3] add parameters checking for 'udevadm settle"

This patch adds parameters checking for 'udevadm settle': - Add extraneous argument checking. If exist extraneous argument,the program will print stderr and exit. - Change "seconds"'s type from "int" to "unsigned int". And use safe_atou() for catching invalid timeout value. --- src/udev/ude

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] add parameters checking for 'udevadm settle"

> -Original Message- > From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl] > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 12:56 AM > To: Yang Zhiyong > Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; k...@vrfy.org > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel][PATCH 1/2] add parameters checking for > 'udevadm settl

Re: [systemd-devel] Need advice on daemon's architecture

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:18:39PM +, Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2) wrote: > Thx for the fast feedback. Good hint with the man page, I'll have a more > detailed look on the page. I think when you need to stay a bit independent > from systemd and don't have a dbus interface which can be used for >

Re: [systemd-devel] Need advice on daemon's architecture

> -Original Message- > From: systemd-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:systemd-devel- > boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Cristian Rodríguez > Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2013 3:25 PM > To: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Need advice on

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] add parameters checking for 'udevadm settle"

On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 07:49:02PM +0800, Yang Zhiyong wrote: > This patch adds parameters checking for 'udevadm settle'. > --- > src/udev/udevadm-settle.c | 20 ++-- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/udev/udevadm-settle.c b/src/udev/udevadm-s

Re: [systemd-devel] tree-wide conversion from libdbus to libsystemd-bus

On 11/03/2013 03:12 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote: > On Sunday, November 3, 2013, Daniel Mack wrote: > > On 10/30/2013 03:48 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Kay Sievers > wrote: > > > > [update] > > > >> To avoid any duplication of work, h

Re: [systemd-devel] Power aware units

On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 17:07 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Systemd should not get any direct or indirect dependency on upower for > > primary service management tasks. It just doesn't sound right to do > > dependencies in this direction. > > That doesn't strike me as as crazy as it may seem. sy

Re: [systemd-devel] Power aware units

On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 16:06 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > systemd already allows launching specific tasks based on a timer, and > > intervals, and I was wondering whether power awareness was something > > planned for launching and stopping un

Re: [systemd-devel] Power aware units

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > systemd already allows launching specific tasks based on a timer, and > intervals, and I was wondering whether power awareness was something > planned for launching and stopping units. > > MacOS X 10.9 has some additional metadata for units t

[systemd-devel] Power aware units

Heya, systemd already allows launching specific tasks based on a timer, and intervals, and I was wondering whether power awareness was something planned for launching and stopping units. MacOS X 10.9 has some additional metadata for units that allows launchd to stop and start particular tasks bas

Re: [systemd-devel] Need advice on daemon's architecture

El 03/11/13 10:42, Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2) escribió: Isn't the classical Linux way an option to? - the daemon does its initialization with the calling thread - once it is done with the initialization, it forks off a process that goes on with the daemons work (the main loop probably) - the call

Re: [systemd-devel] Need advice on daemon's architecture

On Sunday 2013-11-03 14:42, Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2) wrote: > >Isn't the classical Linux way an option to? >- the daemon does its initialization with the calling thread >- once it is done with the initialization, it forks off a process that goes on >with the daemons work (the main loop probably) >

Re: [systemd-devel] tree-wide conversion from libdbus to libsystemd-bus

On Sunday, November 3, 2013, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 10/30/2013 03:48 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Kay Sievers > > wrote: > > > > [update] > > > >> To avoid any duplication of work, here are the tools which still need > >> conversion. Please reply to this mail, in ca

Re: [systemd-devel] Need advice on daemon's architecture

> -Original Message- > From: systemd-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:systemd-devel- > boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Colin Guthrie > Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2013 12:54 PM > To: Peter Lemenkov; systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Nee

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: fix typo

--- man/systemd-run.xml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man/systemd-run.xml b/man/systemd-run.xml index 0881561..cc8a68a 100644 --- a/man/systemd-run.xml +++ b/man/systemd-run.xml @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ along with systemd; If not, see .

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] add parameters checking for 'udevadm trigger'

This patch adds parameters checking for 'udevadm trigger'. --- src/udev/udevadm-trigger.c | 22 +++--- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/udev/udevadm-trigger.c b/src/udev/udevadm-trigger.c index f472996..ee6a4a0 100644 --- a/src/udev/udevadm-trigger

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] add parameters checking for 'udevadm settle"

This patch adds parameters checking for 'udevadm settle'. --- src/udev/udevadm-settle.c | 20 ++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/udev/udevadm-settle.c b/src/udev/udevadm-settle.c index c4fc4ee..06f4004 100644 --- a/src/udev/udevadm-settle.c +++

Re: [systemd-devel] Need advice on daemon's architecture

'Twas brillig, and Peter Lemenkov at 03/11/13 06:40 did gyre and gimble: > Hello All! > I'm working on a system service which uses systemd intensively. Right > now it's socket-activated, with main service of type "simple". I > recently added support for querying and publishing some internals via >

Re: [systemd-devel] tree-wide conversion from libdbus to libsystemd-bus

On 10/30/2013 03:48 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: > > [update] > >> To avoid any duplication of work, here are the tools which still need >> conversion. Please reply to this mail, in case you decide to work on >> anything in that area. > > - timeda

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2]add parameters checking for 'udevadm settle'

> -Original Message- > From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:38 PM > To: YangZhiyong > Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; k...@vrfy.org > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2]add parameters checking for > 'udevadm settle'

Re: [systemd-devel] Need advice on daemon's architecture

On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Does it add anything if I change > type of a main service to "dbus" thus allowing systemd to know for > sure if my service is fully initialized? Yes. Changing to Type=dbus will cause systemd to only consider the service fully started after