Jonathan Harley wrote:
> Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>>> It only says "you must also _offer_ to recipients" (my emphasis), not
>>> "you must provide in case anyone wants it" - it's like the GPL in
>>> that regard. So you don't have to upload a new dump of the whole
>>> derivat
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> It only says "you must also _offer_ to recipients" (my emphasis), not
>> "you must provide in case anyone wants it" - it's like the GPL in
>> that regard. So you don't have to upload a new dump of the whole
>> derivative db (or a diff of your
On 10/12/08, Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Goodness me, that's an enormously confrontational-sounding posting,
Whoops, it was meant to be more controversial than confrontational.
> * I would like OSMF to publish the current licence
> * IMHO OSMF should publish the licence
e.t.c
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> 4.6 Access to Derivative Databases. If You publicly Use a Derivative Database
>> You must also offer to recipients of the Derivative Database a copy in a
>> machine readable form of:
>>
>> a. The entire Derivative Database; or
>>
>> b. A file containing all of the a
Hi,
80n wrote:
> There's no dispensation in the proposed license for a "Master"
> database.
But there is a distinction between a "database" and "data". I always
thought that what I collect with my GPS is just "data", and only becomes
a "database" when combined with the work of others and arran
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 80n wrote:
> > And, of course, the same rules will also apply to the main OSM database,
>
> Will they?
>
> I always thought that in the future, what I contribute to OSM is not a
> database, and OSM is not a databas
Hi,
80n wrote:
> And, of course, the same rules will also apply to the main OSM database,
Will they?
I always thought that in the future, what I contribute to OSM is not a
database, and OSM is not a database aggregator, but instead I contribute
individual data items, which only become a datab
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> It only says "you must also _offer_ to recipients" (my emphasis), not
> "you must provide in case anyone wants it" - it's like the GPL in
> that regard. So you don't have to upload a new dump of the whole
> derivative db (or a diff of your changes) every time y
Hi,
>> 1) We clarify that a Derived Database is only deems to exist when the
>> martial changes have occurred to the content of the DB, but not if the
>> dataset has merely been processed into a different format.
>
> On the face of it this sounds reasonable, although I can see there being
> some
Dair,
That last post was an interesting one. I liked some of your anaologies
regarding material change.
I can think of three types of material changes that we would want
contributed back to OSM:
[1] Modifications that improve (not degrade) the accuracy of a Feature geometry.
[2] Modifications th
Peter Miller wrote:
> 1) We clarify that a Derived Database is only deems to exist when the
> martial changes have occurred to the content of the DB, but not if the
> dataset has merely been processed into a different format.
On the face of it this sounds reasonable, although I can see there bein
El Jueves, 9 de Octubre de 2008, Peter Miller escribió:
> > The share-alike licenses, however, control the *way* you have to release
> > the data, *if* you want to release it.
>
> I think we want someone who derives a better/new DB from OSM data to make
> that available if they use that data for pu
Hi,
> To be clear if you are only using the standard public OSM Dataset then you
> wouldn't have to publish any derivative dataset because there isn't one.
I don't think we should over-regulate things but technically, strictly,
legally speaking if you run osm2pgsql on the planet file you have
a
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iván Sánchez Ortega
> Sent: 08 October 2008 23:21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Paid services from OSM
>
> El Miércoles, 8 de O
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iván Sánchez Ortega
> Sent: 08 October 2008 21:42
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Paid services from OSM
>
> El Miércoles, 8 de Oc
El Miércoles, 8 de Octubre de 2008, Frederik Ramm escribió:
> > "Database" – A collection of Data arranged in a systematic or methodical
> > way and individually accessible by electronic or other means offered
> > under the terms of this Licence. This includes the Database as protected
> > by Datab
Peter,
This was an interesting e-mail. However, I have some questions about
what would constitue an "independent and distinct dataset". Consider
the following scenario:
You take OSM data and modify the feature geometries using data you
collected in the field. You then take this feature geometry a
17 matches
Mail list logo
