Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Clifford Snow writes: > If you look at the bridge segment of the highway going north, it has the > tag motor_vehicle=no. Geez, I killed two birds but the third was still blocking. Is there any way to get an error message out of OSRM when it throws up its hands and can't find a route? It's prett

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Russ Nelson wrote: > I've already used it to fix three routing problems (an overly long > oneway, an access=no that no longer applied, and a bidirectional > motorway). Except they're not active. They haven't fixed anything. The > routing is still wrong. Look: > >

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Rob Nickerson writes: > Congratulations to all those who were involved in getting > directions/routing on openstreetmap.org :-) > > Worth the wait and will hopefully encourage mappers to contribute more turn > restrictions and other routing related info. I've already used it to fix three rou

[OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

??OK thanks. Sorry don't keep track of the help site but will have a look at that. Thanks, Nick From: Marc Gemis Sent: 18 February 2015 12:06 To: Nick Whitelegg Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org Nick, On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:38 PM,

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

18 February 2015 11:51 To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org On 18/02/2015 11:38, Nick Whitelegg wrote: > I've tried some foot routing out and it appears that someone has done a mass > addition of access=private to large numbers of ROWs in Hampshire. >

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

On 17.02.15 12:30, Andreas Labres wrote: > Is there a *Route To Here* option? This seems to work like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?route=;48.19484,16.36637#map=18/48.19484/16.36637 /al ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

On 18/02/2015 11:38, Nick Whitelegg wrote: I've tried some foot routing out and it appears that someone has done a mass addition of access=private to large numbers of ROWs in Hampshire. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=50.96550%2C-1.17800%3B50.96090%2C-

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

was a mistake!!! Nick From: si...@mungewell.org Sent: 17 February 2015 22:45 To: christian.pietz...@googlemail.com Cc: Talk Openstreetmap Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org > OSRM and other routers won't use the highway you want it to use

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

> OSRM and other routers won't use the highway you want it to use because > its > under construction in the OSM data ( > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27593150#map=13/50.4550/-113.8127&layers=Q). Ahh, that would probably do it. I have removed 'construction=trunk' and 'motor_vehicle=no' tags as

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

OSRM and other routers won't use the highway you want it to use because its under construction in the OSM data ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27593150#map=13/50.4550/-113.8127&layers=Q). Most often it's not router but a data problem. 2015-02-17 22:32 GMT+01:00 : > > +1 this is awesome > > Ye

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

> +1 this is awesome Yes, but It would be nice if there were someway to report/analyse incorrect routes. For example driving from Crowsnest Pass to Calgary suggests a valid (but longer) route than anyboby/everybody would actually take. If I jump across to 'project-osm' to give it a suggestio

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Nice! 2015-02-17 16:30 GMT+01:00 Paweł Paprota : > Great work! > > Picked up by Slashdot BTW: > http://tech.slashdot.org/story/15/02/17/1351206/openstreetmaporg-gets-routing > :-) > > Paweł > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015, at 15:22, Steve Coast wrote: >> +1 this is awesome >> >> Steve >> >> On Feb 16,

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Great work! Picked up by Slashdot BTW: http://tech.slashdot.org/story/15/02/17/1351206/openstreetmaporg-gets-routing :-) Paweł On Tue, Feb 17, 2015, at 15:22, Steve Coast wrote: > +1 this is awesome > > Steve > > On Feb 16, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Michael Kugelmann wrote: > >> Am 16.02.2015 um 20

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

+1 this is awesome Steve > On Feb 16, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Michael Kugelmann wrote: > >> Am 16.02.2015 um 20:20 schrieb Rob Nickerson: >> Congratulations to all those who were involved in getting directions/routing >> on openstreetmap.org :-) > +1! > > > Cheers, > Michael. > > ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

On 16.02.15 20:20, Rob Nickerson wrote: > Congratulations to all those who were involved in getting directions/routing > on openstreetmap.org :-) +1 Is there a *Route To Here* option? In the form that: -> I give the destination (coordinates plus name) as GET parameters

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

On Tue Feb 17 10:15:26 2015 GMT, StephaneP wrote: > Thanks for this useful feature ! > > I have one request : > A reverse start/destination button. > Is there a way to add a via, in osrm it is drag the route, but can't do it here. Phil (trigpoint ) -- Sent from my Jolla ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

This is the perfect news . I aslo made a short video that i am promoting in the local community for people to see just how easy is to route. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehHVZvFnVVs&feature=youtu.be I hope this will make people, and also bussines to add more POI , because now they can see the

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Thanks for this useful feature ! I have one request : A reverse start/destination button. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Routing-on-osm-org-tp5833738p5833852.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

> The bicycle router seems to give same result as car router in my area? Also for me, bicycle routers seem unable to avoid major roads. Terrible compared to http://brouter.de/brouter-web/. PS: Please, send unformatted test to mailing list. 2015-02-17 4:00 GMT+01:00 Jóhannes Birgir Jensson : >

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Adding surface tags sounds more like an upgrade than an outbreak. Tagging for the router surely means that you are tagging roads based on their finer properties, single-lane or dual-lane, asphalt or gravel etc. Also if the road is less traveled it sounds like a no-brainer to tag it as unclassi

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 08:19 PM, Colin Smale wrote: > +1 to that! Hope it doesn't lead to an outbreak of "tagging for the > router" though... You know, down/upgrading roads to "improve" the > results... Anecdatally, I would say that outbreak is well in hand already :/

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Colin Smale wrote: > My first quick test in Kent yielded a route (about 6 miles) which while > perfectly viable, no-one in their right mind would take. But that is > probably more of a quirk of OSRM than anything else. Maybe some investigating as to why the rou

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

2015-02-16 21:19 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale : > > My first quick test in Kent yielded a route (about 6 miles) which while > perfectly viable, no-one in their right mind would take. But that is > probably more of a quirk of OSRM than anything else. > That's the beauty, you can try out other engines as

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Thanks all. Great job. For the Ebola activation, there are many GIS deployed in the field. Routing is an important aspect of humanitarian organizations logistic. The World Food Program UN Agency UN-WFP is adding tags for roads practicability. I hope that such asset adding this routing to openstr

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Hi Collin can you send us a link to your OSRM route and how you would drive? It's always interesting if it's a "problem" of OSRM or if there might be some problem with the road network. greets Hedaja 2015-02-16 21:22 GMT+01:00 Hans De Kryger : > Thanks to all those involved for your hard work! >

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Hi really nice. Thanks to all persons involved. It's a very nice integration, looks good and feels good to use =) But I still have two ideas xD 1) right-click menu for OSM.org --> many users are used to have some right-click menu for the map. For OSM.org possible options could be: Set Start, Set En

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Thanks to all those involved for your hard work! *Regards,* *Hans* *http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13 * On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > On 16 February 2015 at 19:20, Rob Nickerson > wrote: > > Congra

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

+1 to that! Hope it doesn't lead to an outbreak of "tagging for the router" though... You know, down/upgrading roads to "improve" the results... My first quick test in Kent yielded a route (about 6 miles) which while perfectly viable, no-one in their right mind would take. But that is probably

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

On 16 February 2015 at 19:20, Rob Nickerson wrote: > Congratulations to all those who were involved in getting directions/routing > on openstreetmap.org :-) A large step forward, thanks to Richard Fairhurst and all others who made this possible! -- Matthijs _

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Am 16.02.2015 um 20:20 schrieb Rob Nickerson: Congratulations to all those who were involved in getting directions/routing on openstreetmap.org :-) +1! Cheers, Michael. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Thanks to all those involved in adding routing to OSM. Routing is a major enhancement to OSM. As Rob said, it will help us fix mapping errors that we may not have noticed without the feature. Thanks, Clifford On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Rob Nickerson wrote: > Congratulations to all those

[OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

Congratulations to all those who were involved in getting directions/routing on openstreetmap.org :-) Worth the wait and will hopefully encourage mappers to contribute more turn restrictions and other routing related info. Cheers, Rob ___ talk mailing l