Hi Allie,
Thanks for the reply.
AM> Where string matching and filter order is concerned, I've been
AM> having no problems here when using read filters. I've been using
AM> IMAP for some time now.
I've seen that you and others have been using it. And the fact that
I've not seen anyone else descri
Hello John,
Thursday, February 26, 2004, 7:42:39 AM, you wrote:
> The message was from Michael to Randy, Susannah, and me -- but it
> was sorted into my Randy folder.
I'm assuming then that it was supposed to go into your Michael folder?
Can you paste your Michael & Randy filters into a reply to
Hi Dave,
Thursday, February 26, 2004, 9:02:48 AM, you wrote:
DG> I'm assuming then that it was supposed to go into your Michael
DG> folder? Can you paste your Michael & Randy filters into a reply to
DG> this email? Maybe that could shed some light on the problem.
I thought this question had led
Hi John,
Thursday, February 26, 2004, 11:07:18 AM, you wrote:
JR> When I filter the Known folder the program moves 218 messages into
JR> Eddie's folder. 118 of them are from Eddie. It appears that all of
JR> the others have Eddie's address in one of the recipient fields.
I might add that the fil
John Rakestraw, [JR] wrote:
JR> A change of employment and recent developments in TB! have
JR> led me to try out IMAP. I set up a new IMAP account in TB!, and
JR> things are working pretty well, except
JR> The filters are not working as expected. I understand that
JR> automatic filtering
Hi,
I've been using TB! for a couple of years now, using POP. I have a
pretty extensive collection of filter/folder combinations set up in
my POP accounts. A change of employment and recent developments in
TB! have led me to try out IMAP. I set up a new IMAP account in TB!,
and things ar
6 matches
Mail list logo
