On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 08:22:56AM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> libexpat assumes the compiler might not know of the C99 format
> specifiers for ptrdiff_t and size_t, and tries to guess alternative
> format strings.
The problem is the printf runtime. There is no good way to detect the
support withou
Am Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 09:32:38AM -0700 schrieb Bob Beck:
> Various spec docs seem all over the place on this, so I am also
> paging Dr. Posix in this email... Hi Philip! :) Is isdigit()
> safe from being screwed up by locale or not?
I think this POSIX.1-2017 (i.e. Open Group Issue 7), locales a
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 04:16:18PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Even Windows went with Linux: WSL2 has Linux syscall compatibility,
WSL2 is running a Linux kernel under HyperV. WSL1 is the system call
translation layer.
Joerg
Am Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 01:23:52PM +1100 schrieb Darren Tucker:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 11:05, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > Am Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 12:53:43PM +0100 schrieb Renaud Allard:
> [...]
> > > Wouldn't it also be a good idea for ssh client to also try the
Am Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 12:53:43PM +0100 schrieb Renaud Allard:
>
>
> On 11/6/22 15:29, Job Snijders wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Support for using Ed25519 for server and user authentication was
> > introduced in 2014. I like the compactness of Ed25519 public keys.
> >
> > Perhaps now is a good
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 04:29:59PM +0100, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> Le Sun, 6 Nov 2022 14:29:52 +,
> Job Snijders a écrit :
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Support for using Ed25519 for server and user authentication was
> > introduced in 2014. I like the compactness of Ed25519 public keys.
> >
> > P
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 08:39:16PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> wc counts items in files. Finding the longest item indeed sounds
> like a task better suited to awk.
Finding outliers, means and counting are all parts of the same basic
class of operations. A good implementation of all of them requ
Hello,
does anyone still know the motivation for SSH_USER_AUTH pointing to a
file with the data instead of containing it directly? It makes the use a
bit more annoying and the only argument I can come up with is not
putting up to about 4KB into the environment.
Joerg
On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 05:44:33PM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote:
> I also noticed NetBSD removed The Hague as a capital of The Netherlands,
> but I disagree with that. Maybe some of the Dutch folks on this mailing
> list can weigh in which is right.
Amsterdam is the capital, The Hague is the seat
Am Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:49:21PM +0200 schrieb Steffen Nurpmeso:
> What surprised me was that the Apple code requires more calls, and
> that today divisions and multiplications still matter. I think it
> was the Cyrix 166+ (or was it Athlon 1600+) where +,-,<<,>> was
> one cycle, * was ten cycle
Am Fri, May 13, 2022 at 09:43:26AM -0500 schrieb Luke Small:
> I made a couple new versions of a new kind of arc4random_uniform-like
> function and some example functions which use them. Instead of having a
> sufficiently large random number greater than the modulus, I pick a random
> number using
Am Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 10:05:05PM +0100 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> On 2022/04/30 13:51, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > I am in two minds about EVFILT_USER. On the one hand, having it on
> > OpenBSD might help with ports.
>
> No opinion on the addition, but I don't think we ran into this in ports
> so f
Am Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 12:45:56AM +0100 schrieb Steffen Nurpmeso:
> Fwiw, i have been astonished by this thread. I found scan-build
> to generate a lot of false warnings, so much indeed that i stopped
> using it .. in summer 2017.
I've spend time on the static analyzer output in NetBSD and I wou
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 06:30:29PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:12:32PM +0100, Frederic Cambus wrote:
> > > I'm building myself a small tool [1] to display .gnu.warning.* sections
> > > names in ELF ob
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:12:32PM +0100, Frederic Cambus wrote:
> I'm building myself a small tool [1] to display .gnu.warning.* sections
> names in ELF objects along with their content, and will check which
> other projects use those sections. So far, aside from us, FreeBSD,
> NetBSD, and DragonF
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 09:21:46PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> (the extra register used by PIE > hurts i386 mode a lot more than amd64
> mode with its extra registers),
Just for the sake of correctness: it hurts much less on x86_64, because
there is IP-relative addressing for code *and* data.
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:12:54AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Index: sbin/iked/types.h
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/iked/types.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.43
> diff -u -p -r1.43 types.h
> --- sbin/iked/types.h 13 May 2021 15:
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 02:07:32PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Edgar Pettijohn:
>
> > In the BUGS section for the getopt(3) manual it mentions not using
> > single digits for options. I know spamd uses -4 and -6 there are
> > probably others. Should they be changed? Or is the manual mista
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 10:36:58PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> + * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
> + *must display the following acknowledgement:
> + *"This product includes cryptographic software written by
> + * Eric Young (e...@cryptsof
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 11:16:59PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I blame dlg@ for making me scrutinize the POWER7 instruction set,
> which led me to the clz instruction, which led me to ffs(). I
> wanted to add this to libc, but then realized the futility because
> the compiler already inli
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 01:50:44PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> uselocale is fine, but it is not on windows, so highly portable code tends to
> prefer strtod_l...
The problem with uselocale is two fold and why I explicitly decided to not
implement it in NetBSD:
(1) It can come at a significant perfo
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 04:19:36PM -0800, j...@bitminer.ca wrote:
>
> Clarify that drand48 returns values not including 1.0.
>
> Index: src/lib/libc/stdlib/rand48.3
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/rand48.3,v
> retrieving r
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 12:25:04PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> guenther@ has pointed out in a separate mail that I can make the diff
> smaller with a cast and that it's acceptable here. As with the code
> it's replacing I've left a comment explaining what we're doing.
There is a rather obvious
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 04:21:17PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> The problem is that POSIX has signals that are sent to processes
> and signals sent to individual threads. Our kernel does not support
> this properly.
Well, not exactly. POSIX has synchronous and asynchronous signals. I.e.
SIGFPE
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 01:53:00PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> this silences the warnings when building dhclient.
You might want to check if __builtin_bswap16 and friends exist first and
prefer to use them directly.
Joerg
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:35:36AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> these days you can use inline functions to get the same effect, but
> it is a more obvious and standard language feature.
If you want to go that way, you still should very likely mark the
functions as always_inline, otherwise the debu
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:17:56PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Pretty sure Linux uses the same defaults for the signedness of char as
> everybody else. But since both signed and unsigned char have to work,
> it might very well be that the rust developers decided to ignore this
> largely historic
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:07:33PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 23:13:05 +0100
> > From: Joerg Sonnenberger
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 11:05:31PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 10:04:45PM +0100, Mar
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 11:05:31PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 10:04:45PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Here is an update diff that implements __cxa_thread_atexit which is
> > emitted by clang (and modern gcc) to implement certain aspects of
> &g
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 10:04:45PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Here is an update diff that implements __cxa_thread_atexit which is
> emitted by clang (and modern gcc) to implement certain aspects of
> C++11 thread_local.
Note that without providing __cxa_thread_atexit, gcc will not detect it
and
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:27:50PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 09/10/17(Mon) 12:22, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:15:46PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Diff below is a small cleanup to keep the accounting of events in
> > > sync w
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:15:46PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below is a small cleanup to keep the accounting of events in
> sync with the number of events on the list. This is a noop for the
> moment, but it's small & easy part to review of my upcoming diff.
Well, not counting the mark
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:16:24AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:40:26AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > > Even on modern amd64s integer arithmetics and bitwise operation
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:40:26AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> Even on modern amd64s integer arithmetics and bitwise operations are
> faster (and more precise in many cases) than floating point
> equivalents.
Can you actually substanciate this claim? The basic x87 instructions
(FLD, FST, FCO
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 04:31:44PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The diff below implements __cxa_thread_atexit(). Calls to this
> function are emitted by the compiler to schedule running desctructors
> for thread_local objects when a thread terminates or calls exit(3).
> The Linux implementation p
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 09:03:30PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Couldn't convince clang not to inline duplicateFun() into bbTest2().
> Splitting things out in a seperate file avoids the issue. Fixes the
> regression test.
Have you tried the combiniation of noinline attribute with
asm volatile(
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:09:13AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > FAIL libexec/ld.so/dlclose/test1/prog3/prog3
> >
> > This fails because clang doesn't respect ELF interposition:
> >
> > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107625.html
> >
> > We g
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:46:17PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> FAIL libexec/ld.so/dlclose/test1/prog3/prog3
>
> This fails because clang doesn't respect ELF interposition:
>
> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107625.html
>
> We generally frown upon interposition s
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 04:17:46PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> What is it about __dead that makes it part of "modern standards", when it
> isn't dead, and an actual keyword. __no_return isn't a standards mandated
> keyword either.
The standard mandated spelling is _Noreturn or noreturn with
st
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 03:42:19PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> 7.20.1.4 (3) If the value of base is zero, the expected form of the subject
> sequence is that of an integer constant *as described in 6.4.4.1*, optionally
> preceded by a plus or minus sign but not including an integer suffix [...]
>
>
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 06:54:52PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/05/29 20:26, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > The clang and gcc behave differently regarding executing tools.
> > While gcc simply runs what he said to, clang tries to be clever
> > and always find absolute path for a tool, refusing
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:30:43AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> In general, if -fdo-something is supported I think it should also
> accept -fno-do-something. Since this was seen in the wild, patching
> llvm makes the most sense. Bonus points if you can get it upstreamed.
The positive forms of
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:45:37PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> This diff extends the support for CFI in binutils with a few
> directives emitted by clang. Most of the code is stolen from
> FreeBSD's GPLv2 binutils. Support for the .cfi_sections directive is
> incomplete; basically we just ignor
On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 09:39:14PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> One that I'm seeing is undefined symbols with the following math functions,
>
> undefined symbol '__floatunditf'
> undefined symbol '__fixunstfsi'
> undefined symbol '__fixunstfdi'
They are historically part of libgcc, but likely
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:53:05PM +1030, Jack Burton wrote:
> One common example of that happening is when a cert gets revoked because
> its private key has been lost/stolen and the user needs a new cert
> associated with the same identity. An even more common example is when
> a cert expires & ge
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:03:44PM -0700, William Ahern wrote:
> Basically, anything short of passing through the entire certificate is going
> to be severely limiting and frustrating, to the point of uselessness.
Passing down the common name is normally enough, but not doing that
makes it nearly
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:05:56PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Clang only accepts SVM instructions with explicit operands, for
> example:
>
> vmload %rax
You might want to look at the aliases e.g. for monitor/mwait. Should be
pretty easy to extend as long as we are talkign about pure register
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:58:59AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The problem here is that the code uses the SHA1 functions in
> libcrypto, but doesn't explicitly link against that library. With our
> ancient binutils we don't notice this, because we link against libtls,
> which as a DT_NEEDED entr
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:33:49AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> while working on OpenBSD/arm64 I stumbled upon the issue that the CTOR
> and DTOR LIST was optimized away by clang. Instead of the __ctors()
> call it created an endless loop, doing nothing at all. I don't know
> why it does exactly
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 12:08:35AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> We can get those optimizations back by doing:
>
> #define memcpy(d, s, n) __builtin_memcpy((d), (s), (n))
You might still want to put a prototype in, just before the define.
Joerg
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:27:15AM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> This is a form we use inside _libc_ so that calls to those functions
> generated by gcc will be redirected to aliases with hidden visibility
> and thus be local calls, without using the PLT. If that won't work
> with clang, then we
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 06:43:42PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 18:13:45 +0100
> > From: Joerg Sonnenberger
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:35:25PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> > > I'm assuming clang handles asm names like
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:35:25PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> I'm assuming clang handles asm names like gcc, such that declaring
>void *memcpy(void *__restrict, const void *__restrict, __size_t)
> __dso_hidden __asm("_dl_memcpy");
>
> will make even internally generated calls go to _dl_m
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 05:47:05PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Building ld.so with clang on amd64 fails with undefined references
> to memset and memcpy. That is odd, since neither function appears
> in the source. Apparently clang optimizes the _dl_memset and
> _dl_bcopy functions into
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:37:10AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> This diff makes LLVM do all the OpenBSD stuff for AArch64.
>
> ok?
If you plan to submit this upstream, you should also update the test
cases accordingly.
Joerg
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 03:53:17PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> I don't get it: why do we need to handle --
> in utils which take no options and no arguments?
Are you sure they will never handle options in the future?
Joerg
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:10:43AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> 1. In GNU as, .align 0 is equivalent to .align 2, but with clang's
>internal assembler .align 0 means "no alignment".
It might be even better to use .balign or .p2align.
> 2. Using "ldr" to load a constant into a register is str
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 07:28:34PM +0200, Stefan Kempf wrote:
> The constructor and destructor tables are declared as arrays with one
> non-NULL element. Walking those until a NULL element is reached looks
> like out-of-bound accesses to newer compilers, and they turn the code
> into infinite loops
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 04:30:10PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 03:34:04PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:16:20PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > It may be somewhat interesting to mention why expm1(x) = exp(x) - 1 and
>
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:16:20PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> It may be somewhat interesting to mention why expm1(x) = exp(x) - 1 and
> log1p(x) = log(1 + x) are provided and what their historical purpose is.
> However, as mlarkin@ put it: are any of our users of exp(3) going to
> seriously be as
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 06:04:32PM -0400, i80...@foxquill.com wrote:
> POSIX specifies that siginfo_t.si_addr must be void*. OpenBSD currently
> defines it as caddr_t. This breaks some userspace programs, such as the
> following minimal case:
This
> The following patch builds the base system cle
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:32:50AM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
> Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:36:22AM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
> > > This isn't a grave issue, but I came across it while exploring integer
> > > overflow and think it's worth sharing.
> > >
> > > g
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 08:36:52AM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> > > Is this okay for ssh and tmux, which are out to be very portable?
> > > Nicholas mentioned that malloc is not required to set errno. I
On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 03:32:11PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> As Ingo recently reminded me, OpenBSD actually did add getprogname() at
> some point, which needs need a actually manual forward definition.
Too early for writing. It does *not* need such an ugly manual extern
decla
On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 12:20:42PM +0100, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> Index: bin/mt/mt.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/mt/mt.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.36
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.36 mt.c
> --- bin/mt/mt.c 12 Nov 2013 04:36:02 -00
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:10:03AM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> If exit(3) is always called, than why not changing the return value to *void*?
Because ISO C says that in non-freestanding environment, main should
retutrn int.
Joerg
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 03:29:46PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On 8/23/15, Caspar Schutijser wrote:
> > Patch below.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Caspar Schutijser
> >
> >
> > Index: sys/kern/kern_tame.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/s
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:04:55AM +0200, Sébastien Marie wrote:
> What is the relationship with libc/locale ? libc++ needs some POSIX
> functions in locale area that are missing in OpenBSD. These functions
> are uselocale(3), newlocale(3) and freelocale(3). (see
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinep
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 09:42:00AM -0300, Renato Westphal wrote:
> I don't think that this is necessary. Yacc includes a skeleton C code
> when generating a parser from a grammar specification file (.y) and
> the stdlib header is in there:
>
> char *banner[] =
> {
> "#include ",
>
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:02:39PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> i leave the battle about lg vs log to others,
> but i prefer 'log' as there is a man page for that
> and there is none for 'lg'...
If anything, it should be "log" because that is the name of the
mathematical function. libm is compl
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:32:55PM -0600, Brent Cook wrote:
> Pretty trivial conversion. ok?
Well, if it is size_t, it should be %zu.
Joerg
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:54:15PM +0200, Timo Myyrä wrote:
> I was trying to port notmuch mail indexer but got little stuck with it as it
> requires newer Zlib version than whats in base.
It is easy to patch notmuch, the requirement is rather silly. FYI.
Joerg
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:29:24AM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 04:17:51PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 11:37:02PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > > clang only has an integrated preprocessor and does not have
> > >
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 11:37:02PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> clang only has an integrated preprocessor and does not have
> a standalone preprocessor or the option of using one.
Huh? clang-cpp will certainly act as standalone preprocessor.
Joerg
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:33:14PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> What compiler warns about this? It's perfectly fine to pass a nonconst
> string to a function that takes a const string.
char * vs unsigned char *?
Joerg
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:24:50PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Sorry, but I disagree with LLVM here. It shouldn't complain about
> static inline functions.
Then mark them as unused, just like you would with a static variable you
insist on keeping.
Joerg
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:24:53AM -0500, sven falempin wrote:
> ==
> /var/db/cloud.json diffs (-OLD +NEW)
> ==
> --- /dev/null Fri Oct 25 01:30:33 2013
> +++ /var/db/cloud.json Thu Oct 17 17:21:15 2013
This just means that the file was created as opposed to empty.
Joerg
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:01:33PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
> I for one don't see a general interest in knowing ones parents
> potentially faked wd. You can find out your wd by saner means.
There is no way to find the logical path without help from the shell.
Joerg
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:09:25PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> On backtrace(3) (which is a GNU thing, I know), static functions don't
> show up with their respective names even though they are in the binary.
> That's a tad annoying, but I am not aware of any other limitation. Can
> someone plea
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:33:18AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:24:37PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:13:19PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 01:08:43PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:13:19PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 01:08:43PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:57:21AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > 1/ Turns out GNU libtool simply *removes* stuff it doesn't understand
&g
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:57:21AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> 1/ Turns out GNU libtool simply *removes* stuff it doesn't understand while
> linking.
I find that no more buggy than GCC passing all unknown junk to ld...
Joerg
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 06:19:55PM +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2012 09:55:53 -0400
> Okan Demirmen wrote:
> >
> > Not really a pasto; from putenv():
> >
> > P = (char **)realloc(lastenv, sizeof(char *) * (cnt + 2));
>
> *puke*
>
> Ok?
If you want to drop the first cast, you
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 06:32:45PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:17:02AM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > I recently got caught out by scandir's quirky memory allocation. Should
> > > we add a note so that others d
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:57:40PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
>
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote on Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 06:00:16AM +0100:
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:27:39AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> >> Or we need the patch below.
> >> It
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:27:39AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Or we need the patch below.
> It looks a bit messy, but i think it is safe.
>
> Thoughts, OKs?
Invert the logic. Check with strcspn first, if there is a character that
needs quoting. This is not the default case after all. If you do
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:20:19AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:04:28PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
>
> > Sorry, let me try that again... Forgot to clean up file descriptor ifd.
>
> AFAIK, this works without this diff. What problem are you trying to solve?
S
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:41:35AM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
> This time its their pipe2 system call which adds flags to the pipe call.
> Its the unix-ish way apparently to turn pipes into files on a kernel
> filesystem, or so they claim.
No, the idea is to make it possible to set O_CLOEXEC atomic
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:52:06PM -0400, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> if ((p = wcsdup(L"foobar")) == NULL) {
>
> or just split it into two lines. Using the comma operator that way
> is correct but likely to confuse some readers. Also, what is that
> 'L' doing there before the "foobar"? Is it so
Hi all,
below is a possible replacement for rcs.c's rcs_expand_keywords.
Since my use case doesn't care about time zones, the rcs_set_tz is
missing, but otherwise it should work without further changes.
The memrchr might need to be replaced with an inline loop, but that's
one of the few saner GNU e
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:15:49PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> where is a listing of all functions implemented in openbsd's libc? Is
> src/lib/libc/include/namespace.h consist of functions not implemented or
> its a relic?
namespace.h is used for protecting the libc namespace. A library may
ov
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:09:14AM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> Ok, I seem to have misread the standard there, sorry. Anyway, I've done
> some tests with all three compilers, and gotten three different
> behaviours:
Can you please say explicitly which GCC version you are talking about?
The behavi
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 06:08:54PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:21:51PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Downloading things can go a lot faster if the server and client support
> > http compression. This is easily added to the ftp program's http support.
> >
> > It consists
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 01:32:27PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I think it is important that people who do use mktemp(3) realize that
> they must loop over failure (creating a new path each time), and they
> need to use a "do not use the path from elsewhere unless the code that
> opens it returns
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:17:16PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> patch below adds "support" for ZN. i think. i'm not totally sure what it
> does, but it makes the words after .ZN show up when i view the page, so
> it's a big win in my book.
Ingo is working on proper .de support, so please no mor
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:02:35PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 06:37:21PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> >> On Monday 19 July 2010 18:26:15 Ted Unangst wrote:
> >> > Free
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 06:37:21PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> On Monday 19 July 2010 18:26:15 Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Free software you can't modify is not free software.
Algorithm != implementation (== software).
> That's especially galling for software where there are real security
> considera
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 05:40:45PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> 35M, that is insane. Either they have machines with infinite memory or you
> can kill the boxes easily.
You don't need 35MB per client connection if interfaces like sendfile(2)
are used. All the kernel has to guarantee in that case i
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 11:54:17AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Does anyone know offhand the reason why network connections fail
> if socket buffers are set above 256k?
You might have to patch sb_max for that.
Joerg
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:14:53PM +0200, Tim van der Molen wrote:
> Would this be a bug in gcc or am I overlooking something?
== has a higher precendence than += and therefore binds stronger.
See operator(7).
Joerg
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
