On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 11:09:03AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Jan Klemkow wrote:
>
> > > > > I'm working on a diff to bring ftps with libtls into our ftpd(8).
> > > > > There
> > > > > is a "getaddrinfo(NULL, "ftps", , )" call, which uses this
> > > > > port. Thus, I made this change.
> >
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 06:36:52PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > From: "Theo de Raadt"
> > Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:26:31 -0600
> >
> > Jan Klemkow wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:18:43PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > > I would like a further justification for removing these
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:18:43PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I would like a further justification for removing these ports from
> the very limited dynamic reserved space used by bindresvport.
>
> (but not by rresvport, which appears still stomp over them)
>
> For tcp, 32 of the 512 are
Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > > > I'm working on a diff to bring ftps with libtls into our ftpd(8). There
> > > > is a "getaddrinfo(NULL, "ftps", , )" call, which uses this
> > > > port. Thus, I made this change.
> > >
> > > Hang on -- does the world want ftps support?
>
> I don't know, what "the
> From: "Theo de Raadt"
> Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:26:31 -0600
>
> Jan Klemkow wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:18:43PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > I would like a further justification for removing these ports from
> > > the very limited dynamic reserved space used by
Jan Klemkow wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:18:43PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I would like a further justification for removing these ports from
> > the very limited dynamic reserved space used by bindresvport.
> >
> > (but not by rresvport, which appears still stomp over them)
> >
>
I would like a further justification for removing these ports from
the very limited dynamic reserved space used by bindresvport.
(but not by rresvport, which appears still stomp over them)
For tcp, 32 of the 512 are locked out.
For udp, 19.
What software is actually using these ports?
Is that
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 11:09:12AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/05/04 12:07, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > Add missing ftps defaults ports to servies(5).
> >
> > Index: services
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/services,v
> >
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Every new entry in this file reduces the range available for dynamic
> port selection, so it would seem a good idea to cull a few if we're
> adding some. Here are some likely candidates;
Precisely.
And one day there will be no reserved ports left, and then what?
reads good.
OK florian
On 2021-05-05 11:09 +01, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/05/04 12:07, Jan Klemkow wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Add missing ftps defaults ports to servies(5).
>>
>> OK?
>>
>> bye,
>> Jan
>>
>> Index: services
>>
On 2021/05/04 12:07, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Add missing ftps defaults ports to servies(5).
>
> OK?
>
> bye,
> Jan
>
> Index: services
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/services,v
> retrieving revision 1.99
> diff -u -p -r1.99
Hi,
Add missing ftps defaults ports to servies(5).
OK?
bye,
Jan
Index: services
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/services,v
retrieving revision 1.99
diff -u -p -r1.99 services
--- services18 Feb 2021 02:30:29 - 1.99
+++
12 matches
Mail list logo
