[tw] Re: Formatting and Rendering Pretty Link

2009-06-18 Thread Gnosos
Whoops! I think I partly answered my own questions. The $ exposes the enclosed string to inline LaTeX rendering. I was looking in the TiddlyWiki documentation, but it's in the LaTeX documentation. Still, it doesn't render properly when the string is in a [[-delimited link. Also, if I use TW's clos

[tw] Re: Plugin library

2009-06-20 Thread Gnosos
On Jun 19, 10:53 pm, wolfgang wrote: > But to keep many plugins as separate .js files up to date takes much > more time, than to use one MasterTW with all plugins updated through > the backstage sync utility. With MasterIncludesPlugin in the slave > TW's installed, it then load a bunch of indivi

[tw] Re: TW 2.5.0: Tinytiddly and jQuery

2009-06-21 Thread Gnosos
I understand the point. Distribution and portability are easier with embedded code. However, TW 2.5.0 already includes the separate file TiddlySaver.jar, so complete portability involves copying two files. With a separate jQuery directory, one could keep the old version of jQuery and still try a n

[tw] Re: Announcing Tiddlywiki 2.5.2

2009-06-24 Thread Gnosos
Thanks for the update and the great service! Now my question. I noticed that the $.twFile documentation doesn't have the Demo yet. Yet it seems to address my current need (http://groups.google.com/ group/TiddlyWiki/browse_thread/thread/60fd809a5a8d5204). So, my question is would the following wo

[tw] Re: TW 2.5.0: Tinytiddly and jQuery

2009-06-26 Thread Gnosos
On Jun 21, 9:49 am, FND wrote: > > What's the status of tinytiddly? > > I was under the impression the the TinyTiddly build mechanism was now > largely automated, so it should in theory be up to date. > It might just be an oversight - will investigate and report back here. > > > A good compromis