Re: Where IS mod_webapp ??

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > >Sounds a good idea. --with-apr-lib and --with-apr-include > >would be used to > >overwrite ${local_prefix}/lib and ${local_prefix}/lib > > Could you fix the configure.in for that, it will be great. Done committed :)) > > >> BTW, even when I modify the configure, I get

RE: Where IS mod_webapp ??

>Sounds a good idea. --with-apr-lib and --with-apr-include >would be used to >overwrite ${local_prefix}/lib and ${local_prefix}/lib Could you fix the configure.in for that, it will be great. >> BTW, even when I modify the configure, I get a libwebapp.a >> but no libwebapp.so and so couldn't bui

Re: Where IS mod_webapp ??

!!! But it uses -l webapp, so it should use libwebapp.a. Could it be that you have a broken libtool? > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39

RE: Where IS mod_webapp ??

CTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 6:44 PM >To: [EMAIL

Re: Where IS mod_webapp ??

"Clere, Jean-Frederic" wrote: > > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > > > On 21/11/2001 10:15 pm, "Gerard van Enk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> Any comments? > > > > > > I think it's a good idea to make a release. > > > > I'm on a plane ATM, but +1 for me, J.F., would you be R.M. for this one? >

Re: Where IS mod_webapp ??

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > On 21/11/2001 10:15 pm, "Gerard van Enk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Any comments? > > > > I think it's a good idea to make a release. > > I'm on a plane ATM, but +1 for me, J.F., would you be R.M. for this one? I will try. At least I can make the tarball and r

Re: Where IS mod_webapp ??

On 21/11/2001 10:15 pm, "Gerard van Enk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Any comments? > > I think it's a good idea to make a release. I'm on a plane ATM, but +1 for me, J.F., would you be R.M. for this one? Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional comman

Re: Where IS mod_webapp ??

jean-frederic clere wrote: > Gerard van Enk wrote: > >>Chad Johnson wrote: >> >> >>>Hey, >>> Pier can correct me on this, but I believe mod_webapp is still beta >>>quality. So grabbing whats in CVS is a safe bet. The binarys that come >>>with Tomcat 4.0.1 have some bugs that have since been c

Re: Where IS mod_webapp ??

Gerard van Enk wrote: > > Chad Johnson wrote: > > > Hey, > > Pier can correct me on this, but I believe mod_webapp is still beta > > quality. So grabbing whats in CVS is a safe bet. The binarys that come > > with Tomcat 4.0.1 have some bugs that have since been corrected (ie only > > being a

Re: Where IS mod_webapp ??

Chad Johnson wrote: > Hey, > Pier can correct me on this, but I believe mod_webapp is still beta > quality. So grabbing whats in CVS is a safe bet. The binarys that come > with Tomcat 4.0.1 have some bugs that have since been corrected (ie only > being able to reference web apps in $CATALINA_

Re: Where IS mod_webapp ??

Endre Stølsvik wrote: > On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Chad Johnson wrote: > > | The WebApp Module has a little webpage. Take a look here. > | > | http://nagoya.apache.org/~pier/ > > Thanks! > > But I'd also like a more "stable" release. How do I get that? Take a look at

Re: Where IS mod_webapp ??

On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Chad Johnson wrote: | The WebApp Module has a little webpage. Take a look here. | | http://nagoya.apache.org/~pier/ Thanks! But I'd also like a more "stable" release. How do I get that? - And this is *WAY* underdocumented!! | - Original Message - | From: "Endre