I'm confused.
When editing the server.xml file to use Ajp13 support
should I delete the AJP12 support or leave it in?
Is there a way to find out which Ajp is running on my server?
I.E should my server.xml be:
Connector className=org.apache.tomcat.service.PoolTcpConnector
At 04:37 PM 5/30/2001 +0100, you wrote:
I'm confused.
When editing the server.xml file to use Ajp13 support
should I delete the AJP12 support or leave it in?
You have to leave ajp12 in because tomcat uses it in its
wind down procedure, at least in 3.x versions. You can
run everything else on 13
Tim O'Neil wrote:
At 04:37 PM 5/30/2001 +0100, you wrote:
I'm confused.
When editing the server.xml file to use Ajp13 support
should I delete the AJP12 support or leave it in?
You have to leave ajp12 in because tomcat uses it in its
wind down procedure, at least in 3.x versions. You
At 02:19 PM 5/30/2001 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm considering a patch to allow ajp13 to handle the wind-down
as well. Security-wise, it's much better for ajp13 to be able to
do it, but StopTomcat.java has ajp12 hardwired
So Jim- in 4.0 and beyond setting p13 to that task wasn't
in the
Scratching an itch... I've heard a number of resistant movements
in wider TC acceptance due to the fact that the shutdown procedure
is as open as it is, even using the 'inet' hack to ensure a local
command.
Tim O'Neil wrote:
At 02:19 PM 5/30/2001 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm considering a
I've been developing/testing/staging with Apache 1.3.14 / mod_jk / Tomcat
3.2.1 for the last
several months (started with Tomcat 3.1 and upgraded to 3.2.1 soon after
its release).
I had not seen any performance problems (of course!) until I hit production
and saw my CPU
utilization go through
erformance of AJP12 vs. AJP13
I've been developing/testing/staging with Apache 1.3.14 / mod_jk / Tomcat
3.2.1 for the last
several months (started with Tomcat 3.1 and upgraded to 3.2.1 soon after
its release).
I had not seen any performance problems (of course!) until I hit
production
and
--jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Mahaffey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 5:48 AM
Subject: Performance of AJP12 vs. AJP13
I've been developing/testing/staging with Apache 1.3.14 / mod_jk / Tomcat
3.2.1 for the last
several months
Could someone please clarify the following for me?
Besides SSL via JSSE, what else do I lose if I use ajp12 instead of ajp13?
(ajp13 is supposed to be faster, right?).
The reason that I would like to stay with ajp12 is ajp13 can not handle POST
with object.
Thanks,
Peter
--- Jan Labanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is my (and others) experience that mod_jk has to
be loaded BEFORE
mod_rewrite for it to act responsibly. In your case
the mod_rewrite is
linked statically, i.e., loaded before mod_jk. I
would suggest to
make both mod_jk and mod_rewrite DSO,
Filip,
--- Filip Hanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, if I could just get someone to tell me why
apache
Alias and Rewrites are not working with tomcat...
tell us what you are trying to do and send us some
sample config files and
how your environment is setup. is becomes much
easier
It is my (and others) experience that mod_jk has to be loaded BEFORE
mod_rewrite for it to act responsibly. In your case the mod_rewrite is
linked statically, i.e., loaded before mod_jk. I would suggest to
make both mod_jk and mod_rewrite DSO, and load/add module mod_jk before
mod_rewrite.
-Message d'origine-
De: Mel Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: mardi 13 fvrier 2001 23:33
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto
Question:
what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be
specified for a jkmount statement in the
auto-generated
Question:
what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be
specified for a jkmount statement in the
auto-generated mod_jk.conf-auto file?
I.E., it always generates statements like:
JkMount /myapp/servlet/* ajp12
JkMount /myapp/*.jsp ajp12
I've even tried disabling all reference to ajp12 from
ect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.filip.net
- Original Message -
From: "Mel Martinez" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:32 PM
Subject: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto
Question:
what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be
specified for
al Message -
From: "Mel Martinez" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:32 PM
Subject: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto
Question:
what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be
specified for a jkmount statement in the
auto-genera
well for me :)
Filip
~
Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.filip.net
- Original Message -
From: "Mel Martinez" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: ajp12 vs ajp13 m
17 matches
Mail list logo