Ajp12 vs Ajp13

2001-05-30 Thread Andy C
I'm confused. When editing the server.xml file to use Ajp13 support should I delete the AJP12 support or leave it in? Is there a way to find out which Ajp is running on my server? I.E should my server.xml be: Connector className=org.apache.tomcat.service.PoolTcpConnector

Re: Ajp12 vs Ajp13

2001-05-30 Thread Tim O'Neil
At 04:37 PM 5/30/2001 +0100, you wrote: I'm confused. When editing the server.xml file to use Ajp13 support should I delete the AJP12 support or leave it in? You have to leave ajp12 in because tomcat uses it in its wind down procedure, at least in 3.x versions. You can run everything else on 13

Re: Ajp12 vs Ajp13

2001-05-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
Tim O'Neil wrote: At 04:37 PM 5/30/2001 +0100, you wrote: I'm confused. When editing the server.xml file to use Ajp13 support should I delete the AJP12 support or leave it in? You have to leave ajp12 in because tomcat uses it in its wind down procedure, at least in 3.x versions. You

Re: Ajp12 vs Ajp13

2001-05-30 Thread Tim O'Neil
At 02:19 PM 5/30/2001 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: I'm considering a patch to allow ajp13 to handle the wind-down as well. Security-wise, it's much better for ajp13 to be able to do it, but StopTomcat.java has ajp12 hardwired So Jim- in 4.0 and beyond setting p13 to that task wasn't in the

Re: Ajp12 vs Ajp13

2001-05-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
Scratching an itch... I've heard a number of resistant movements in wider TC acceptance due to the fact that the shutdown procedure is as open as it is, even using the 'inet' hack to ensure a local command. Tim O'Neil wrote: At 02:19 PM 5/30/2001 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: I'm considering a

Performance of AJP12 vs. AJP13

2001-04-10 Thread Tom Mahaffey
I've been developing/testing/staging with Apache 1.3.14 / mod_jk / Tomcat 3.2.1 for the last several months (started with Tomcat 3.1 and upgraded to 3.2.1 soon after its release). I had not seen any performance problems (of course!) until I hit production and saw my CPU utilization go through

Re: Performance of AJP12 vs. AJP13

2001-04-10 Thread Jeff Kilbride
erformance of AJP12 vs. AJP13 I've been developing/testing/staging with Apache 1.3.14 / mod_jk / Tomcat 3.2.1 for the last several months (started with Tomcat 3.1 and upgraded to 3.2.1 soon after its release). I had not seen any performance problems (of course!) until I hit production and

Re: Performance of AJP12 vs. AJP13

2001-04-10 Thread Tom Mahaffey
--jeff - Original Message - From: "Tom Mahaffey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 5:48 AM Subject: Performance of AJP12 vs. AJP13 I've been developing/testing/staging with Apache 1.3.14 / mod_jk / Tomcat 3.2.1 for the last several months

ajp12 vs ajp13 for Tomcat 3.2.1

2001-03-28 Thread Peter Dai
Could someone please clarify the following for me? Besides SSL via JSSE, what else do I lose if I use ajp12 instead of ajp13? (ajp13 is supposed to be faster, right?). The reason that I would like to stay with ajp12 is ajp13 can not handle POST with object. Thanks, Peter

Re: Aliases/Rewrites (was: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-16 Thread Mel Martinez
--- Jan Labanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is my (and others) experience that mod_jk has to be loaded BEFORE mod_rewrite for it to act responsibly. In your case the mod_rewrite is linked statically, i.e., loaded before mod_jk. I would suggest to make both mod_jk and mod_rewrite DSO,

Aliases/Rewrites (was: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-15 Thread Mel Martinez
Filip, --- Filip Hanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, if I could just get someone to tell me why apache Alias and Rewrites are not working with tomcat... tell us what you are trying to do and send us some sample config files and how your environment is setup. is becomes much easier

Re: Aliases/Rewrites (was: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-15 Thread Jan Labanowski
It is my (and others) experience that mod_jk has to be loaded BEFORE mod_rewrite for it to act responsibly. In your case the mod_rewrite is linked statically, i.e., loaded before mod_jk. I would suggest to make both mod_jk and mod_rewrite DSO, and load/add module mod_jk before mod_rewrite.

RE: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-14 Thread Coetmeur, Alain
-Message d'origine- De: Mel Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: mardi 13 fvrier 2001 23:33 : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto Question: what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be specified for a jkmount statement in the auto-generated

ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-13 Thread Mel Martinez
Question: what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be specified for a jkmount statement in the auto-generated mod_jk.conf-auto file? I.E., it always generates statements like: JkMount /myapp/servlet/* ajp12 JkMount /myapp/*.jsp ajp12 I've even tried disabling all reference to ajp12 from

Re: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-13 Thread Filip Hanik
ect [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.filip.net - Original Message - From: "Mel Martinez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:32 PM Subject: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto Question: what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be specified for

Re: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-13 Thread Mel Martinez
al Message - From: "Mel Martinez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:32 PM Subject: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto Question: what determines whether ajp12 or ajp13 will be specified for a jkmount statement in the auto-genera

Re: ajp12 vs ajp13 mod_jk.conf-auto

2001-02-13 Thread Filip Hanik
well for me :) Filip ~ Namaste - I bow to the divine in you ~ Filip Hanik Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.filip.net - Original Message - From: "Mel Martinez" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:11 PM Subject: Re: ajp12 vs ajp13 m