Hi,
I fixed it in HeuristicPojoProcessor to exclude the method/field annotated
with @Callback.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: Callbacks are properties?
ant elder wrote:
R
Hi,
I think the jsp:useBean only works with JSPs. How about pure servlet?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 12:47 AM
Subject: Web Application integration story
Recently we have been prototy
Hi, Scott.
I think the issue is in the creation of SDODataSource. I checked in a fix
under 536028, please verify it fixes your problem.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Kurz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: SDO-Axiom DB probl
Hi,
I uploaded a brief guide for extending Tuscany to the following wiki page.
Please review and help improve it.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/51879/ExtendingTuscany.ppt
Thanks,
Raymond
-
To uns
Hi,
The axis2 binding related stuff are not fully ported yet. I think Simon Nash
is working on it.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Ignacio Silva-Lepe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tuscany Dev List"
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 8:27 AM
Subject: Build failure
Anyone getting
Hi, Simon.
I suggest that you submit incremental patches. This way, we could also help
to port the module together.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 4:09 AM
Subject: Re: Status of Java SCA 0.90 release
S
Hi, Mark.
Sorry for not responding to your questions promptly as some of us are
attending JavaOne.
I added the two methods back to the ScopedImplementationProvider interface
so that you can move forward. You should be able to test if the
component.getImplementation() instanceof ScopedImpleme
Hi,
It makes sense to me to provide a few methods on RuntimeComponentReference
and RuntimeComponentService to simplify the life of extension developers.
Here's what I see from the usage pattern perspective.
1) For a reference, it's made available to the client either by injection
(proxy) or
ake a
look at it but deferred after reading Ignacio's comment that "This guide
seems to be obsolete already."
Thanks.
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I uploaded a brief guide for extending Tuscany to the following wiki
page. Please review and help improve it.
http://cwiki.apache
Hi,
Do the following methods give you enough information?
ReferenceBindingProvider createReferenceBindingProvider(RuntimeComponent
component, RuntimeComponentReference reference, M binding);
ServiceBindingProvider createServiceBindingProvider(RuntimeComponent
component, RuntimeComponentService
lloworldwsclient.composite to use the interface.wsdl from the previous
email and then with a break point at
Axis2BindingProviderFactory.createReferenceBindingProvider (or anywhere
else
in the Axis2 binding code), I couldn't find anything pointing to the WSDL
interface.
...ant
O
Hi,
The WorkContext was defined to carry some context such as the conversation
id, http session id and callback path over the thread local. And the usages
are so messy in the code and nobody can really understand how it should be
used.
As part of the final push for clean SPIs, I propose that
Hi,
The first cut is now in under r537483.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: Removing WorkContext
Yes +1 from me, that would be really good to get done.
...ant
On
Hi,
It's a very nice demo. I prefer to have it under sca/demos/bigbank.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 10:29 AM
Subject: JavaOne Demo
Hi all,
I would like to commit the three modules that I
Hi, Sebastien.
It was the file I missed in the commit. Thank you for fixing it and I'm
sorry for the break.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: Removing WorkContext
Simon Laws
ry
jboynes Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] OSUser Repository
jsdelfino Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] OSUser Repository
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Meeraj Kunnumpurath
[EMAIL PROTECTED] OSUser Repository
rfeng Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] OSUser Repository
svkrish S Venkatakrishnan [EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
As the o.a.t.s.scope and o.a.t.s.factory packages in the core-spi are in the
grey area, I'll move them into core for now and keep the package names
as-is. We could revisit this later when the requirements become clearer.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien
Hi,
I clicked the commit button too quickly. This moved o.a.t.s.scope and
o.a.t.s.factory packages from core-spi to core.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 11:17 AM
Subject: svn commit: r538270 - in /in
Hi,
Can you check if tuscany-interface-java-runtime is on the classpath? This
module contributes the JavaInterfaceIntrospectorExtensionPoint .
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 2:15 PM
Subject: JavaInterfaceI
Hi,
I have now refactored the RuntimeWire.Source and RuntimeWire.Target into a
new interface EndpointReference uner r538339. The Message interface now has
the following methods:
public interface Message {
...
EndpointReference getFrom();
void setFrom(EndpointReference from);
Endpoint
Hi, Simon.
You must have imcompatible jars on the classpath. Can you rebuild the sca
and distro and try again?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 4:58 PM
Subject: NoSuchMethodError from binding-echo sample
Hi,
The self references are created to support the
ComponentContext.createSelfReference() in a consistent way as regular
references.
In your case, if the binding.jsonrpc is declared under the component, then
the component can only be assessed over jsonrpc binding (not even SCA
binding). And
Can we just remove the left side from Logo 1? My first "false" impression
was they are for two logos.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: Tuscany Logo..
Logo 1 is still best. We just
Hi,
Please see my comments below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed changes to PackageProcessor to handle artifact URI
consistently
Some comments and questions inli
Hi,
The main purposes of the implementation-crud and binding-echo are to
demonstrate how to add new implementation and binding types using the
extension SPIs. As part of that, we have some code to show/verfiy how the
extensions are used and runnable with the Tuscany runtime in the format of
t
Hi, Bill.
Welcome to Tuscany.
You hit an interesting known issue related to the format of xsd:gMonth
described at http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/ch19-77111.html. The
following is quoted from that page:
"The value space of xsd:gMonth is the period of one calendar month recurring
each c
Hi,
This seems to be class isolation issue in WebSphere. Are you using Websphere
6.0.x or 6.1? As far as I know, the 6.1 comes with OSGi support which can
help isolate different versions of EMF classes.
How did you make the SDO/EMF jars available to WebSphere, per server or per
application?
Hi,
Build failure seems to be a show-stopper to me :-). Thank you for catching
it.
The databinding-jaxb uses the maven-jaxb-plugin to generate JAXB classes for
the unit tests. So if we fix it, the scope of testing shouldn't be a big
deal. All we have to do is to run the maven build on the en
a release?
What is the fix, from the earlier post it didn't sound like there was a
good
known fix?
...ant
On 5/22/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Build failure seems to be a show-stopper to me :-). Thank you for
catching
it.
The databinding-jaxb uses the mav
Hi,
I have updated the "Extending Tuscany" document with the latest SPIs and
added the "Add databinding" section. Please review and comment.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/51879/ExtendingTuscany.ppt
Thanks,
Raymond
---
Hi, Manu.
Welcome to Tuscany and thank you for looking into Tuscany/Geronimo
integration.
Please see my comments inline below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Manu George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: Tuscany sample app
Hi
Hi,
I downloaded the 0.90 binary distro and unzipped it locally. I also deleted
my local maven repo. Then when I follow the README in
tuscany-sca-0.90-incubating\samples\calculator to run "mvn" to build the
samples, I get the following error as appended later.
Am I not supposed to build the
Hi, Simon.
Do you have any luck to fix the problem? If not, we probably have to
document the limitation and let the release out.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany
-account/src/main/ bigbank-account/src/main/java/
bigbank-account/src/main/java/bigbank/
bigbank-account/src/main/java/bigbank/account/ bi
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Sebastien.
I'm trying to play with this cool demo and I have a few questions:
1) How can I start the stockquote and accountserv
ect: Re: Tuscany sample app
Hi Raymond,
Thank you for the warm welcome and for the prompt response. I
am adding my comments inline below.
On 5/23/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Manu.
Welcome to Tuscany and thank you for looking into Tuscany/Geronimo
integration.
emos: ./ bigbank-account/ bigbank-account/src/
bigbank-account/src/main/ bigbank-account/src/main/java/
bigbank-account/src/main/java/bigbank/
bigbank-account/src/main/java/bigbank/account/ bi
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I followed your instructions, but I still saw the failure as shown below.
I
t: r540764 [1/2] - in
/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/demos: ./ bigbank-account/ bigbank-account/src/
bigbank-account/src/main/ bigbank-account/src/main/java/
bigbank-account/src/main/java/bigbank/
bigbank-account/src/main/java/bigbank/account/ bi
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I started the StockQ
Hi,
I grabbed the latest RC src distro and tried to build it locally after
removing the local maven repo. But now I saw a test case failure as shown
below.
Can somebody else try it?
The wierd thing is that if I tried to build the failing module again, then
it passed.
Thanks,
Raymond
[INF
Hi,
Anthoer issue: If I run "ant" for samples/binding-echo from the src distro,
I saw compilation errors.
It seems that the build.xml assumes that location="../../lib/tuscany-sca-manifest.jar"/> is in place.
Thanks,
Raymond
C:\Apache\tuscany-sca-0.90-incubating-src\samples\binding-echo>ant
Hi,
In the RC, I'm seeing that composite element is missing required
targetNamespace attribute, for example, the Calculator.composite has the
following:
http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0 name="Calculator">
...
By the SCA spec, the composite should have the targetNamespace attr:
A sim
Hi,
I tried the binary distro too and the samples worked well.
+1 to release it!
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:19 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating RC2
Please review and vote
Hi, Scott.
It's a bit wierd here. By the code in Input2InputTransformer, if the target
databinding supports wrapping (for SDO, it's true), we try to convert at the
wrapper element level first, i.e., transform the OMElement to a wrapper SDO,
and then get the children from the wrapper.
Do you
le
operation can not have different databindings. If so I'd say that during
DataBindingJavaInterfaceProcessor processing we could set the databinding
we
find at the input type level on the operation level as well.
I'm sure you might have a better idea. I know this was discussed awh
at the input type level on
the operation level as well." - what are the issues with doing that?
...ant
On 5/25/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Scott.
For now, you can use @DataBinding at the operation level to declare the
databinding behind the interface mapping.
D
Hi,
Here is my understanding of the Spec about the URI for a service binding:
Let's assume that we have the following declaration:
component: c1
service: s1
binding: name="b1" uri="uri1"
binding: name="b2"
binding:
If the base URI for http is "http://localhost:8080/";,
Hi,
The assembly spec allows us to declare targets for a component reference.
Meanwhile, the enclosing binding elements can provide endpoints too. The
following is quoted from the spec.
"Note that a binding element may specify an endpoint which is the target of
that binding. A reference must
Hi,
I'm sorry that a local change slipped into the commit and it hit a bug in
SUN JDK. I fixed it under r542409.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 7:53 PM
Subject: Build break - databinding test case error
Hi, Simon.
I would appreciate if you can update the document directly. The document is
on the wiki but it's still in the PPT format. I was trying to convert it to
a wiki page but gave up due to the time constraint as I had to adjust the
formattings all by hand. Maybe we can try to see if there
Hi,
There are two issues behind:
1) For a reference with multiplicity 1..1, there should be one and only one
target and that's why wireList.get(0) is used. To find the corresponding
wire for a given binding, we have a better way:
RuntimeComponentReference.getRuntimeWire(Binding binding).
2)
te:
I'm not sure if you're saying its wrong or right that the endpoint is
changing in the helloworld example?
...ant
On 5/25/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Here is my understanding of the Spec about the URI for a service
binding:
Let's assume that we have
Hi, Simon.
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: Wire binding selection?
Ok, Raymond, this is useful.
So what it does seem to come down to is binding selecti
Hi,
It seems that the 1.0 SCA java spec defines an algorithm to introspect the
services provided by a java interface as follows:
1. @Service will be checked first and honored
2. The following is quoted from Java spec 1.2.1.3.
Introspecting services offered by a Java implementation
In the cas
Hi,
By the SCA spec, when a deployable composite is added to the SCA domain,
it's "included" by the logical SCA domain composite. As a result, all
top-level components must have unique names.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Huang Kai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: "???"
Hi,
To me, an embedded broker will help development testing. We can use the same
strategy: if the broker module is present, its module activator can start a
broker in the "start()" method. For external brokers, just don't add the
broker module to the classpath.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Origina
Hi,
I agree with Simon that it seems to be a bit rush to have the next release
in one or two weeks. Getting user feedback from 0.90 release and figuring
out what's next would take some time. But if we have specifc features that
can be achieved soon, I'm OK with it. One thought: would it be pos
Hi, Simon.
We have a JSON databinding but it's not in the main build. I thought that we
moved it to "contrib" but I cannot find it in the source tree any more.
Sebastien, do you know where they are?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tu
day, June 01, 2007 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: 0.91 release?
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
One thought: would it be possible that we add such features to 0.90
branch instead of creating a new one out of the trunk?
I'm not sure, I was thinking about the following:
- leave the 0.90 release branch whe
Hi,
Please see my comments inline below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Rajini Sivaram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 7:22 AM
Subject: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Hello,
I would like to contribute to the SCA<->OSGi integration activities.
Hi,
It seems that it breaks the build as the following dependency cannot be
resolved:
org.osoa
sca-api
1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
I'll fix it to use "org.apache.tuscany.sca" as the group id.
A side question, should the group id for sca-api be org.osoa or
org.apache.tuscany.sca?
Thanks,
Ray
Hi, Scott.
Thank you for finding the problem. I'll fix it.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Kurz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 4:09 PM
Subject: problem in Input2InputTransformer: if (sourceWrapped &&
(!targetWrapped))
In testing some of the issue
Hi,
Now the sample is failing with the following error. It seems the endpoint
address is not matching.
Caused by: org.apache.axis2.AxisFault: Transport error: 404 Error:
/HelloWorldSe
rviceComponent
at
org.apache.axis2.transport.http.CommonsHTTPTransportSender.writeMessa
geWithCommo
Hi,
I like the topology.xml approach. For the topology composite, I suggest that
we use a syntax something like the following:
http://$host:8080/acbd";>
https://$host:8090/acbd";>
http://$host:8085/jsonxyz";>
Hi, Ant.
I agree with you that we should generalize the service binding URI. I think
I have a proposal here.
When the CompositeBuidler builds the composite, we should calculate the
service binding URI based on various pieces of the information as defined by
the spec and save the effective UR
erent attributes for services or references, on
some binding's the URI may include the reference name so this would end
up
including $self$ in the URI.
...ant
On 5/18/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The self references are created to support the
ComponentContex
Hi,
Please see my comments inline below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: Servlet path change?
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Ant.
I agree with yo
Hi,
I think the base URI for a scheme cannot be global to a SCA domain. As you
said, that would be useless. The spec needs some clarifications here.
We might have two options here:
1) The SCA domain defines the base URI pattern such as http://$host:8080/.
And $host will be replaced by the ru
Hi,
I agree with you that the base URIs are from the topology model. What I
meant before is that the CompositeBuilder will be aware of the topology
model and use it to compute the effective URI for the service bindings. Are
we on the same page?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
Good points. +1 to have separate modules handle the physical topology
aspect.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: Servlet path change?
Raymond Feng wrot
That's right. Basically the binding provider needs to figure out which
scheme to use for a paticular service or reference.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 2:28 AM
Subject: Re: What's an
Hi,
Please see my comments inline below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 5:25 AM
Subject: Domains, runtimes, components and cardinality
Following on from recent discussion on the distributed
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Budinsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 5:47 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Fuhwei Lwo for Tuscany Committer
Absolutely +1 from me!
Frank.
"kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/26/2007 07:10:2
Hi,
By reading the spec, the "process" attribute specifies the target QName of
an executable WS-BPEL process. We can follow the QName resolving approach to
figure out which BPEL file to use. During the processing of a SCA
contribution, we can create a BPELImplementation w/ the QName and mark i
Hi,
At this moment, we use the term "SPI" to represent all the interfaces and
classes accessible to the extension developers. I think it can be further
divided into two categories.
1) The contract interfaces/classes
2) The utility/helper classes
1 is mandatory while 2 is optional to extensio
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 6:20 AM
Subject: SCA binding and wiring
The SCA binding provides the default binding and appears when the user
doesn't expl
the code is.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/extension-helper/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/spi/utils/AbstractImplementation.java
How about "not completely trivial" instead of "error-prone"?
...ant
On 7/3/07, Raymond Feng <[EMA
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Manu George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both lists)
Hi ,
From Paul
Hi,
I think it's legal to have references from both A->B and B->A. Please create
a JIRA to track this issue.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Huang Kai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 10:48 PM
Subject: StackOverflowException when mutual reference
Hi, Scott.
Thank you for bringing up this issue. I have been thinking about this for a
while:-).
There are three interfaces in the picture:
1) [componentType.reference.interface]: The java interface of the reference
defined by the component type, which is introspected from the @Reference
an
osite-level
> > ref/service.
> > The
> > code setting up the binding intf (3) might really want a Java atomic
> > component impl's Java intf to percolate up to be set on the binding.
> > (Maybe a WSDL->Java conversion is the right thing to do here then).
> >
&g
Java atomic
> component impl's Java intf to percolate up to be set on the binding.
> (Maybe a WSDL->Java conversion is the right thing to do here then).
>
> Anyway, I'm expanding the discussion a bit ...
>
> I need to think a bit to articulate in more detail some questions
d have
a
> > > Composite impl with WSDL interface on the Composite-level
ref/service.
> > > The
> > > code setting up the binding intf (3) might really want a Java
> > > atomic
> > > component impl's Java intf to percolate up to be set on the
> > >
Hi,
I created an empty WIKI page @
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+Geronimo+Integration.
We should try to capture the key points for the discussions.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Manu George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, July
Hi, Mike.
I like your proposal to define the interface compatibility. The current 1.0
spec is vague in this area.
One thing to clarify: are you proposing to use WSDL as the canonical IDL?
WSDL 1.1 or 2.0?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi, Mike.
Thank you for looking into it. Please see my comments inline.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 6:34 AM
Subject: Need spec defined Databindings? Was: (TUSCANY-824) DataBinding: Is
it a concern of Programmi
Hi,
I have reviewed the content and it looks pretty good to me. The source
distro can be built from an empty local maven repo successfully. I can run
the samples and demos using ant script with the binary distro. The LICENSE
and NOTICE files are in place.
+1.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original
Hi,
Please run "mvn clean install".
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Charters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 8:56 AM
Subject: Build problems
Hi,
I'm trying to build Tuscany Java and have hit a couple of problems.
I've started
Hi,
Sorry for the delay. I'll try to apply it today.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: Please apply reworked patch for TUSCANY-1341
Could someone take a look at this patch, please? I'd
+1 on Simon's suggestion.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: Website ACL
This ia a really huge list. Most of these people have no connection
with Tuscany. Perhaps write access could be
Hi, Simon.
I'm also looking into this area from a different perspective now: support
multiple bindings for references and services in terms of promotion and
wiring. I also remember Sebastien once suggested that we add a new
computedURI to the base Binding model.
I take the value of "target"
targets
Hi guys,
More comments inline. There are some issues with
multiplicity and multiple bindings.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: Canonical form for binding URIs and refe
comments inline. There are some issues with
multiplicity and multiple bindings.
Dave
- Original Message - From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: Canonical form for binding URIs and reference targets
Comments i
reference with multiplicity = 1..N:
The composite reference:
Would this promotion end up with two effective wires?
a) C1/R1-->C2/S1 (binding.sca) for internal wire in the composite
b) C1/R1-->C3/S1 (binding.sca)
Thanks,
Raymond Feng
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm seeing the build failure as follows:
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamReader
[INFO]
[INFO] Trace
java.lang.NoClassDe
;s a change on SDO pom, so
you might have to rebuild SDO first.
On 7/12/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing the build failure as follows:
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] j
Hi,
It's a bit strange. The implementation.osgi is built successfully for me.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 2:21 PM
Subject: Build errors in SCA implementation-osgi and
implementation-pojo2-extension
I'm see
Hi,
The latest SDO changes introduced an NPE and broke some code in
tuscany-wsdl2java. I'm fixed the SDO problem under r555786 and the wsdl2java
break under r555787.
Please verify.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Hi,
I see the following exception thrown from the itest\osgi-implementation
suite intermittently. It seems to be a timing issue. Can somebody take a
look?
Thanks,
Raymond
Work thread Thread[main,5,main] - Order, submitted (play.com), fulfilled,
shippe
d (ParcelForce)
Test complete
Deactiva
Hi,
I'm excited to see it as an important step for the Tuscany integration with
web containers. Now that web applications start to share the same Tuscany
runtime, I expect to see the isolation/sharing issues between different
contributions :-). Java classloading is one of them. Luciano has sta
+1. I have noticed Amita's contribution.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:17 PM
Subject: Getting developer jira access to Amita Vadhavkar
Amita Vadhavkar has been helping DAS for cou
Hi,
This is the transitive dependency support by maven. IMO, duplicating the SDO
dependency might lead to inconsistent versions for SDO and DAS unless we
need to use a different version of SDO other than the one used by a given
DAS version.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From
1 - 100 of 2335 matches
Mail list logo
