Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 3/7] add an i2c driver for mx31

On 20:40 Wed 26 Mar , Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > From: Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This patch adds an i2c driver for Freescale i.MX processors > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > No changes w

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 04/13] microblaze: add Emaclite ethernet driver

Hi Wolfgang, this code was sent to mailing list I think twice. I think Grant reviewed this code once, didn't he? For Ben. Can you look at drivers/net/xilinx_emac.c and xilinx_emaclite.c? >> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I see you sneaked this in via your microblaze custodi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add apollon board MAINTAINERS entry

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Add apollon board MAINTAINERS entry > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zu

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Allow use of ARCH=powerpc when building

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The linux kernel is now mostly ARCH=powerpc, so to make life easier > allow use to use ARCH=powerpc and convert it to ARCH=ppc. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > Identical to the patch 'Allow use to use ARCH=powerpc when buildi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][resubmit] QE IO: Add initial data to pin configuration + read/write functions

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > On the MPC83xx & MPC85xx architectures that have QE, add initial data to the > pin configuration table (qe_iop_conf_tab). This is relevant for GPIO pins > defined as output. One can setup a value of -1 to leave the value unchanged. > QE initialization

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ata: update the libata.h from ata.h of linux kernel

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Current libata.h of u-boot is out of sync from linux kernel, > this patch make it be consistent with linux kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Tor Krill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/block/fsl_sata.c | 14 +-

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bugfix: the watchdog post for lwmon5

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > You are right! I've checked it again and find the mistake by myself. > > Subject: [PATCH] bugfix: lwmon5 watchdog post > If the hardware watchdog detects a voltage error, the watchdog set GPIO62 to > low. > The watchdog POST have to detect this lowpege

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix OneNAND erase command

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > It mis-calculates the block address. > Also fix DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR in env_onenand. > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > diff --git a/common/cmd_onenand.c b/common/cmd_onenand.c Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix OneNAND read

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > It should access with 16-bit instead of 8-bit > > Now it uses the generic memcpy with 8-bit access. It means it reads wrong > data from OneNAND. > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] Support for LinkStation / KuroBox HD and HG PPC models

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This patch is based on the port by Mihai Georgian (see linkstation.c for > Copyright information) and implements support for LinkStation / KuroBox HD > and HG PPC models from Buffalo Technology, whereby HD is deactivated at > the moment, pending networ

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Additional PCI IDs for IDE and network controllers

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > These PCI IDs are required by the Linkstation platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sorry, does not apply - please rebase and resubmit: Applying Additional PCI IDs for IDE and network controllers error: patch failed: i

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add CONFIG_MII_INIT support to related boards

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > From: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Replace CONFIG_8xx and CONFIG_MCF532x to CONFIG_MII_INIT in > cmd_init.c. Add CONFIG_MII_INIT to board configuration files > that use mii_init() in cmd_init.c. > > Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash

> Le samedi 12 avril 2008 à 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit : >> Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes > > Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the > standard CFI driver ? It surely doesn't have any on the SAM9/CAP9 > boards, but I'm not sure of the olde

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for AT91RM9200EK board

> > Le samedi 12 avril 2008 à 22:06 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit : >> Add support for the AT91RM9200EK Board. > > Hi Ulf, > > I do have a few issues with your patch. As you have seen, I started > adapting the Atmel changes for the AT91SAM boards, and in doing so I > tried to implement (well, qu

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix 8xx build to conditionally compile fdt.o

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> Change to COBJS-y method so that the fdt.o library can be properly >> conditionally compiled. Without this change, the mpc8xx boards that >> don't use CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT still build the fdt.o, causing code bloat >> and compile warni

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 4/7] add SMSC LAN9x1x Network driver

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sunday 13 April 2008, Ben Warren wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:23:44PM -040

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 4/7] add SMSC LAN9x1x Network driver

On Sunday 13 April 2008, Ben Warren wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:23:44PM -0400, Nick Droogh wrote: > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > Would this driver work wit

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Change env_get_char from a global function ptr to a function.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]@transmode.se> you wrote: > Did you try this one or did du skip it this release? Unfortunately this doesn't apply any more: Applying Change env_get_char from a global function ptr to a function. error: patch failed: common/cmd_bootm.c:1150 error: common/cmd_bootm.c: p

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix 8xx build to conditionally compile fdt.o

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Change to COBJS-y method so that the fdt.o library can be properly > conditionally compiled. Without this change, the mpc8xx boards that > don't use CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT still build the fdt.o, causing code bloat > and compile warnings. > > Signed-off-by: Ge

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Move init_sequence table into code.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Global variables are not ideal before relocation to RAM. Byt they don't cause any real problem either, or am I missing something? I tend to reject the patch. > -init_fnc_t *init_sequence[] = { The original idea of having such a list of funtion poin

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 04/13] microblaze: add Emaclite ethernet driver

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > From: Michal Simek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I see you sneaked this in via your microblaze custodian repo. This was a Bad Thing, and I ask you not to do such things. You were supposed to run this through

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] Introduce phys_size_t and move phys_addr_t into asm/types.h

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Also add CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT on powerpc to deal with 32-bit ppc's > that have larger physical addresses like 44x, 85xx, and 86xx. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > include/asm-arm/io.h |2 -- > include/asm-arm/types.h

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for setting the I2C bus speed in fsl_i2c.c

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Yes. Thanks. ... > Then how about doing this: > > --- a/include/asm-m68k/global_data.h > +++ b/include/asm-m68k/global_data.h > @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ typedef struct global_data { > unsigned long vco_clk; > unsigned long flb_clk; > #endi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC] Rename include/md5.h to u-boot-md5.h

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Some systems have md5.h installed in /usr/include/. This isn't the desired > file (we want the one in include/md5.h). This will avoid the conflict. > This fixes the host tools building problem > > Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for setting the I2C bus speed in fsl_i2c.c

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > This patch should resolve the compilation issues on 547x/548x cpus. Unfortunately it's missing your Signed-off-by: line. Also, please post patches inline rather than attachments. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 4/7] add SMSC LAN9x1x Network driver

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:23:44PM -0400, Nick Droogh wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > Would this driver work with the LAN9218 chip as well? > > > > The chips in this

[U-Boot-Users] s3c2410 no success (my fault)

I just don't know enough about how u-boot and C work to get u-boot 1.3.x working on my s3c2410 board. I managed to get 1.2.0 going with the nand commands added (not mtdpart though) which should be enough to get linux booted (though I'm not entirely sure the nand commands are actually working - expe

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] allow ports to override bootelf behavior

Change the bootelf setup function into a dedicated weak function called do_bootelf_exec. This way ports can control the behavior however they like before/after calling the ELF entry point. --- common/cmd_elf.c | 33 + 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletio

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] allow ports to override go behavior

Split the arch-specific logic out of the common go code and into a dedicated weak function called do_go_exec() that lives in cpu directories. This will need review from i386/nios people to make sure I didn't break them. --- common/cmd_boot.c | 33 + lib_i386/boar

[U-Boot-Users] u-boot wiki and arch-specific details

we maintain a Blackfin-specific u-boot wiki that goes into quite a bit of detail, some of which is duplicated with the main u-boot wiki. how do people feel about extending the u-boot wiki to allow for arch-specific details ? -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message p

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] drivers: clean up the ata_piix.h

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/block/ata_piix.h | 26 +++--- > 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] drivers: code clean up

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/block/libata.c | 36 ++-- > include/sata.h |5 + > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 7/7] Support for the MX31ADS evaluation board from Freescale

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This patch adds support for the MX31ADS evaluation board from Freescale, > initialization code is copied from RedBoot sources, also provided by > Freescale. > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cannot apply this one: Applying

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 2/2] Freescale eLBC FCM NAND driver

Stefan, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This is a driver for the Flash Control Machine of the enhanched Local Bus > Controller found on some Freescale chips (such as the mpc8313 and the > mpc8379). > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Fixed one instance of trailin

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 3/7] add an i2c driver for mx31

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > From: Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This patch adds an i2c driver for Freescale i.MX processors > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pulled in directly, thanks. Best rega

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 2/7] core support for Freescale mx31

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > From: Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This patch adds the core support for Freescale mx31 > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pulled in directly, thanks. Best regards, Wo

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Altera Stratix II support

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > From: "eran liberty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Adds Support for Altera's Stratix II. > > Within your board specific init file you will have to call > > 1. fpga_init (/* relocated code offset. usually => */ gd->reloc_off); > 2. fpga_add (fpga_altera, (Alt

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 5/7] mx31 litekit support

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > From: Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This patch adds support for the mx31 litekit board > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pulled in directly, thanks. Best regards, Wol

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 4/7] add SMSC LAN9x1x Network driver

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:23:44PM -0400, Nick Droogh wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > Would this driver work with the LAN9218 chip as well? > > The chips in this family differ in that some of them have an integrated > phy and others not. Some have a 16bi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] doc: english polishing for README.sata

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > according to gvb's suggestion, polishing for the doc. > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > doc/README.sata | 24 > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 d

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix warnings introduced by I2C bus speed setting patch

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/i2c/fsl_i2c.c |7 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & De

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 6/7] Phytec Phycore-i.MX31 support

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > From: Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This patch adds support for the Phytec Phycore-i.MX31 board > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pulled in directly, thanks. Best rega

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2 1/7] Separate omap24xx specific code from arm1136

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > From: Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Move omap24xx code to cpu/arm1136/omap24xx, rename include/asm-arm/arch-arm= > 1136 > to cpu/arm1136/omap24xx. > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] allow ports to override go behavior

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > blah, and without fail, i swapped nios/i386 > --- > This splits the arch-specific logic out of do_go() and into a dedicated weak > function called do_go_exec() that lives in cpu directories. This will need > review from i386/nios people to make sure i di

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Don't panic if a controller driver does ecc its own way.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Some hardware, such as the enhanced local bus controller used on some > mpc83xx chips, does ecc transparently when reading and writing data, rather > than providing a generic calculate/correct mechanism that can be exported to > the nand subsystem. > > T

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] add support for Toradex Colibri module

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Ok, done. New, refurbished patch is attached. Please don't attach, but include inline. Ideally, use git-send-email to send the patch. Signed-off-by line missing. Please rebase and resubmit. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] allow ports to override go behavior

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This splits the arch-specific logic out of do_go() and into a dedicated weak > function called do_go_exec() that lives in cpu directories. This will need > review from i386/nios people to make sure i didnt break them. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] allow ports to override bootelf behavior

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This splits the dcache logic out of do_bootelf into a dedicated weak function > called do_bootelf_exec. This way ports can control the behavior before > executing an ELF image however they like. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] disable caches before booting an app for Blackfin apps

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > It isn't generally save to execute applications outside of U-Boot with caches > enabled due to the way the Blackfin processor handles caches (requires > software assistance). This patch disables caches before booting an ELF or > just booting raw code. T

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Loading a kernel on MX31ADS using U-boot

On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Now I generated uImage correctly and it boots fine. Good > Have you ever tried to boot U-boot from NAND > (K9K1G08U0B) on the i.MX31ADS? No, I have not. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski -

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Loading a kernel on MX31ADS using U-boot

Hi Guennadi, Now I generated uImage correctly and it boots fine. Have you ever tried to boot U-boot from NAND (K9K1G08U0B) on the i.MX31ADS? Thanks, Fabio Estevam --- Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > > I tried to load the kerne

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull request u-boot-microblaze.git

>> Could you look at it? >Sure. Done. Sorry for the delay. >Best regards, >Wolfgang Denk No worries. Thanks, Michal Simek www.monstr.eu - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this yea

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git - small fixes

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-mpc83xx.git > > Dave Liu (2): > mpc83xx: Fix the SATA clock setting of 837x targets > mpc83xx: Fix the bug of serdes initialization > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1): > mpc837xerdb: Fix warning:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc85xx.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-mpc85xx.git master > > Kumar Gala (2): > 85xx: Use SVR_SOC_VER instead of SVR_VER > 85xx: Fix detection of MP cpu spin up Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull request u-boot-microblaze.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Could you look at it? Sure. Done. Sorry for the delay. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-669

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [cfi-flash] Please pull git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git master > > Guennadi Liakhovetski (1): > cfi_flash: Support buffered writes on non-standard Spansion NOR flash Applied. Thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, M

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [ppc4xx] Please pull git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git master > > Eugene O'Brien (1): > ppc4xx: Fix power mgt definitions for PPC440 > > Stefan Roese (3): > ppc: Revert patch 70431e8a that used _start instead of CFG_MONITOR_BASE > ppc4xx: Fix Ca

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Release status - open patches, pull requests etc.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I little while ago I submitted patches for two temperature sensors > drivers: a bug fix for the LM75 driver, and a bug fix and clean-up for > the LM73 driver. The LM75 changes are in the master branch, but the > last time I checked the LM73 changes we

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [ppc4xx] Please pull git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git master > > Stefan Roese (2): > ppc: Revert patch 70431e8a that used _start instead of CFG_MONITOR_BASE > ppc4xx: Fix Canyonlands default environment to

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull request: u-boot-sparc

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Please pull from the master branch at git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-sparc.git > > I have rebased it agains the mainline this morning. > > Best regards, > Daniel Hellstrom > > > The following changes since commit aeff6d503b6006573

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull request u-boot-microblaze.git

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > The following changes since commit aeff6d503b6006573d5c6b04fc658a64bebee5fa: > Wolfgang Denk (1): > Merge branch 'master' of git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-fdt > > are available in the git repository at: > > . master > > Michal Simek (13):

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] LM73 bug fix for negative temperatures and cleanup

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > When the LM73 temperature sensor measures a temperature below 0 C, the > current driver does not perform sign extension, so the result returned is > 512 C too high. This patch fixes the problem, and does general cleanup > of the code. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash

Le samedi 12 avril 2008 à 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit : > Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the standard CFI driver ? It surely doesn't have any on the SAM9/CAP9 boards, but I'm not sure of the older AT91RM92

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for AT91RM9200EK board

Le samedi 12 avril 2008 à 22:06 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit : > Add support for the AT91RM9200EK Board. Hi Ulf, I do have a few issues with your patch. As you have seen, I started adapting the Atmel changes for the AT91SAM boards, and in doing so I tried to implement (well, quite a lot was bor

[U-Boot-Users] (no subject)

各位老总：您们好！ 诚祝：您们在2008年里；有鼠不尽的快乐！鼠不尽的收获！鼠不尽的钞票！ 　 鼠不尽的幸福！鼠不尽的美满生活！愿： 您们阖家欢乐！幸福安康！ 我是（深圳市珊湖岛进出口有限公司）的负责人；可以提供：出口报关单， 　 核销单等等一系列手续；代理：出口报关，商检，境内外运输..等等；还可 以代办：出口欧盟许可证，欧盟产地证；并且还有（广州国际贸易交易会）的摊 位可以转让；有意者请

[U-Boot-Users] PCI express NIC for testing?

Hello, I'm looking for a PCIe card, preferably a NIC, to test PCIe under U-Boot. I have realized, that the E1000 driver of U-Boot does not have support for PCIe cards. It actually lags behind the Linux driver a lot and porting seems to require substantial effort (different SPD EEPROM, PCIe, etc.).