[Bug 1926990] Re: update-notifier should not alert users about esm-apps in a ESM machine

2021-06-07 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
I can confirm that the xenial, bionic, focal and hirsute packages are working as expected. To perform the verification I have used the following script: -- #!/bin/sh set -x series=xenial name=$series-dev function generate_motd_message() { message=$1

[Bug 1926990] Re: update-notifier should not alert users about esm-apps in a ESM machine

2021-06-07 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
I can confirm that the xenial, bionic, focal and hirsute packages are working as expected. To perform the verification I have used the following script: -- #!/bin/sh set -x series=xenial name=$series-dev function generate_motd_message() { message=$1

[Bug 1927219] Re: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version

2021-06-04 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I confirmed the golang-github-docker-go-connections regression in Hirsute and I filed another SRU bug to fix it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-docker-go- connections/+bug/1930891 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1930891] Re: FTBFS in Hirsute is blocking runc migration

2021-06-04 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
After further discussion within the team we decided that using ubuntu0.21.04.1 is the best option here. There is the unlikely but possible case where -3 is removed from impish-proposed and Impish gets released with -2. ** Attachment added: "debdiff3"

[Bug 1930891] Re: FTBFS in Hirsute is blocking runc migration

2021-06-04 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for taking another look on this Utkarsh! We append ubuntu0.XX.YY.1 to the version string when we have the same version in 2 releases but in this case this version was released only in Hirsute, Impish was not released yet :) I'll be uploading the last debdiff I attached. -- You received

[Bug 1930891] Re: FTBFS in Hirsute is blocking runc migration

2021-06-04 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
There you go, the attached debdiff has some DEP-3 headers in the added patch. ** Attachment added: "debdiff2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-docker-go-connections/+bug/1930891/+attachment/5502460/+files/debdiff2 -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1930891] Re: FTBFS in Hirsute is blocking runc migration

2021-06-04 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I tried to just import the patch added by the Debian maintainer with no changes but I think it is better to add some DEP-3 headers as you mentioned. Checking the upstream bug tracker I noticed I filed this very same bug some months ago :) but no replies so far:

[Bug 1930891] Re: FTBFS in Hirsute is blocking runc migration

2021-06-04 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
The attached debdiff adds the patch to skip the tests as mentioned in the description and fixes the FTBFS. ** Attachment added: "debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-docker-go-connections/+bug/1930891/+attachment/5502458/+files/debdiff ** Description changed: +

[Bug 1930891] [NEW] FTBFS in Hirsute is blocking runc migration

2021-06-04 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Public bug reported: golang-github-docker-go-connections is FTBFS in Hirsute because a couple of tests rely on an expired certificate. This failure is blocking the runc migration. The Debian maintainer fixed it in the next revision but it did not make into Hirsute. The simple fix is to backport

[Bug 1929597] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.0.2 -> 27.1) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Groovy, Hirsute

2021-06-02 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Description changed: [Impact] - This release includes bug-fixes and we would like to - make sure all of our supported customers have access to these - improvements. The notable ones are: + This release provides fixes to numerous issues encountered and reported by users against the recent

[Bug 1926819] Re: Empty MOTD on up-to-date systems (includes fix)

2021-06-01 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Also, regarding the autopkgtest failures we are seeing, they seem related to this update-manager bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1929865 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926819] Re: Empty MOTD on up-to-date systems (includes fix)

2021-06-01 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
I can confirm that the xenial, bionic, focal and hirsute packages are working as expected. To perform the verification I have used the following script: -- #!/bin/sh set -x series=xenial name=$series-dev function generate_motd_message() { message=$1

[Bug 1926990] Re: update-notifier should not alert users about esm-apps in a ESM machine

2021-05-31 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) ** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) ** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu

[Bug 1927219] Re: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version

2021-05-31 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for the testing Colin! FYI I already uploaded the fix to Impish (development release) and as soon it lands in the release pocket I can start the SRUs. At the moment it is blocked by one regression: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-

[Bug 1929859] Re: wine and wine-development FTBFS with OpenLDAP 2.5

2021-05-28 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for the patches Sergio. The changes LGTM, the patch was provided by upstream (more like a workaround for the stable release) and they said it'd be safe. A small thing I'd fix in the changelog of both packages is to align the text better. Instead of: * Fix FTBFS with OpenLDAP 2.5. (LP:

[Bug 1929613] Re: Unblock version 0.1.1-2 from impish-proposed

2021-05-27 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
The maintainer will be uploading a fixed version (0.1.2-1) to Debian. We will need to sync it when it gets available. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929613 Title: Unblock version

[Bug 1927004] Re: [MIR] fence-agents

2021-05-27 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
The description of this bug was updated after the renaming of the binary packages happened. Now we have src:fence-agents providing the following binary packages in Impish: - fence-agents (transitional package) - fence-agents-common - fence-agents-base - fence-agents-extra If I got everything

[Bug 1929744] Re: One moment, checking your subscription first Unexpected APT error. See /var/log/ubuntu-advantage.log

2021-05-26 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Hi bigsicret, thanks for reporting that. We will definitely take a look on it. However, this bug reporting is leaking your private token. Please, contact customer services to invalidate that token and get a new one -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1929613] Re: Unblock version 0.1.1-2 from impish-proposed

2021-05-26 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
There is still an issue with non-amd64 architectures. I filed a bug upstream to start a discussion: https://github.com/bdrung/bdebstrap/issues/2 ** Bug watch added: github.com/bdrung/bdebstrap/issues #2 https://github.com/bdrung/bdebstrap/issues/2 -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1927996] Re: /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt_check.py:FileNotFoundError:/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt_check.py@16:check_output:run:__init__:_execute_child

2021-05-26 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Description changed: update-notifier-common does not depend on lsb-release and both apt_check.py and apt-cdrom-check both utilize lsb_release. The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding update-notifier. This problem was most recently seen with

[Bug 1929613] Re: Unblock version 0.1.1-2 from impish-proposed

2021-05-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for the review Andreas! Package uploaded: $ dput ubuntu ../bdebstrap_0.1.1-2ubuntu1_source.changes Checking signature on .changes gpg: ../bdebstrap_0.1.1-2ubuntu1_source.changes: Valid signature from F823A2729883C97C Checking signature on .dsc gpg: ../bdebstrap_0.1.1-2ubuntu1.dsc: Valid

[Bug 1929613] Re: Unblock version 0.1.1-2 from impish-proposed

2021-05-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
The attached debdiff fixes the regression. autopkgtest is happy now: autopkgtest [17:59:38]: summary unittest PASS examples PASS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1929613] Re: Unblock version 0.1.1-2 from impish-proposed

2021-05-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Attachment added: "debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bdebstrap/+bug/1929613/+attachment/5500320/+files/debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929613 Title:

[Bug 1929613] [NEW] Unblock version 0.1.1-2 from impish-proposed

2021-05-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Public bug reported: bdebstrap/0.1.1-2 is blocked in impish-proposed because of a missing autopkgtest dependency on debian-archive-keyring. I submitted a PR to upstream to fix this and it was already merged: https://github.com/bdrung/bdebstrap/commit/91c4ac2a3b67e835eb628f11680bb9df17bf1e2f

[Bug 1929443] Re: upgrade mysql 5.7 to 8.0 during release upgrade (18.04.5 to 20.04.2) fails due to unsupported SQL mode

2021-05-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for taking the time to file this bug. Your analysis seems right and there is nothing we can do as Ubuntu, upstream decided to remove that option and we cannot support it without upstream. What you need to do is to avoid the usage of the NO_AUTO_CREATE_USER sql_mode option if you want to

[Bug 1912390] Re: [Patch] TLS/DTLS: inconsistent allowed_uses behaviour when in debug mode / not in debug mode

2021-05-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for the heads-up Graham. Our team will be taking a look at it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912390 Title: [Patch] TLS/DTLS: inconsistent allowed_uses behaviour when in

[Bug 1912389] Re: [Patch] SIGSEGV: crash when certificate contains extension longer than 512 bytes

2021-05-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for the heads-up Graham. Our team will be taking a look at it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912389 Title: [Patch] SIGSEGV: crash when certificate contains extension longer

[Bug 461354] Re: finger doesn't support utf8 characters

2021-05-24 Thread Lucas De Angelis
This bug is still here in Ubuntu 20.04. Is there anything I could do to help to add the patch and fix the bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461354 Title: finger doesn't support

[Bug 1926990] Re: update-notifier should not alert users about esm-apps in a ESM machine

2021-05-21 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Description changed: [Impact] When users are running an ESM distro and looking at the MOTD they may be surprised by an alert generated by update-notifier that both esm-infra and esm-apps could be enabled in the machine to receive future updates. However, esm-apps will not bring much to

[Bug 1927996] Re: /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt_check.py:FileNotFoundError:/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt_check.py@16:check_output:run:__init__:_execute_child

2021-05-21 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
[Impact] Because update-notifier does not explicit have the `lsb-release` package as a dependency, users may install the package and rely on `apt-cdrom-check` to work, but it will fail, since it runs the `lsb_release -sr` command on it. [Test case] To reproduce the issue: 1. Launch a xenial

[Bug 1927219] Re: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version

2021-05-21 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucas

[Bug 1927219] Re: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version

2021-05-21 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
21-05-05T00:48:31.826412096Z" level=error msg="get state for f90f054966ab6b78304797d420a1f948c85e5b6e425037417f8966c08cd9a0f1" error="context deadline exceeded: unknown" ``` This version of runc triggered the problem: ``` runc (1.0.0~rc93-0ubuntu1~20.04.1) foc

[Bug 1929106] Re: runc -v empty output

2021-05-21 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + Users cannot check the runc version running 'runc --version'. This is + not a big deal but it would land along with LP #1927219 which is an + important fix. + + [Test Plan] + + Check if 'runc --version' returns the runc version. + + [Where problems could

[Bug 1927219] Re: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version

2021-05-21 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Also affects: runc (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: runc (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: runc (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: runc (Ubuntu Focal)

[Bug 1929106] Re: runc -v empty output

2021-05-21 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Also affects: runc (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: runc (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: runc (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: runc (Ubuntu Groovy)

[Bug 1929106] Re: runc -v empty output

2021-05-21 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for taking the time to file this bug. This is a known issue and I already addressed it in my PPA where I am preparing the next version to be uploaded to the archive: https://launchpad.net/~lucaskanashiro/+archive/ubuntu/container- stack/+packages Therefore, this will be fixed soon across

[Bug 1928416] Re: Error when attaching UA ESM key

2021-05-20 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Thank you for this Rakesh and just to be sure can you install any other snap in your system ? Or you are only seeing that snap error when trying to run ua attach ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1927219] Re: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version

2021-05-20 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
@Colin I updated my PPA with version 1.0-rc95 which also contains the fix for CVE-2021-30465. Could you test this new version and make sure your regression is fixed? ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-30465 -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1928416] Re: Error when attaching UA ESM key

2021-05-19 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Hi Rakesh, looking at the logs maybe snapd is not working as expected. Can you please provide the output of: systemctl status snapd.service -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928416

[Bug 1928697] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.25-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-05-18 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1928635 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928635 Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report. After checking the logs the only thing relevant to your problem was this part of the apt log: Setting up mysql-server-8.0 (8.0.25-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) ...

[Bug 1928635] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.25-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-05-18 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report. After checking the logs the only thing relevant to your problem was this part of the apt log: Setting up mysql-server-8.0 (8.0.25-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) ... mysqld will log errors to /var/log/mysql/error.log mysqld is running as pid 8278 Error:

[Bug 1928604] Re: ubuntu-advantage-tools should not be auto-installed on supported Ubuntu releases

2021-05-18 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for taking the time to file this bug and trying to make Ubuntu better. ubuntu-advantage-tools does not provide only a way to enable ESM, it also provides a bunch of other services (from the project README): "The Ubuntu Advantage client provides users with a simple mechanism to view,

[Bug 1817374] Re: mysql-server-5.7 5.7.25 upgrade did not complete properly

2021-05-18 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report. I created a Bionic container to test the upgrade of mysql version 5.7.21-1ubuntu1 to 5.7.34-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 and it worked as expected: root@mysql-test:~# apt list --upgradable Listing... Done mysql-server-5.7/bionic-updates,bionic-security

[Bug 1928758] Re: All apt commands failed after upgrade to 27.0.2~20.04.1

2021-05-18 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Hi Ulrik, thanks for reporting this problem. How are you creating the machines in the serves ? I just want to understand the process you are using to reproduce the issue here and find a fix for it. Also, when can you also say the apt version that was being used when you upgraded

[Bug 1896223] Re: no-quorum-policy=demote and on-fail=demote features for MSSQL servers

2021-05-17 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Description changed: [Impact] - This feature allows the use of other mechanisms to deal with failures. + This feature allows the use of other mechanisms to deal with failures instead of fencing nodes (usually reboot a machine), and let for instance MS SQL server handle some failures

[Bug 1896223] Re: no-quorum-policy=demote and on-fail=demote features for MSSQL servers

2021-05-17 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + This feature allows the use of other mechanisms to deal with failures. + instead of fencing nodes (usually reboot a machine), and let for + instance MS SQL server handle some failures by itself. We can consider + this SRU as part of a "hardware enablement"

[Bug 1926819] Re: Empty MOTD on up-to-date systems (includes fix)

2021-05-14 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
SRU template verification [Impact] On a system without updates to be installed, not showing any message in motd feels that something went wrong in the backend. Also, currently we are printing unwanted white spaces in that scenario, which is not a good user experience here. [Test case] To

[Bug 1926990] Re: update-notifier should not alert users about esm-apps in a ESM machine

2021-05-14 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
in: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926990 Title: update-notifier should not alert us

[Bug 1928416] Re: Error when attaching UA ESM key

2021-05-14 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Hi Rakesh, thanks for reporting this problem. Can you please attach the content of /var/log/ubuntu-advantage.log file here so we can better understand how can we tackle this issue ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1927029] Re: ua attach command fails

2021-05-13 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Hi Alex, I think this error is happening because cloud-init has not fully run. I think rebooting the machines would be enough to handle that issue. But if you don't want to do that, you can restart cloud-init manually by running: DI_LOG=stderr /usr/lib/cloud-init/ds-identify --force cloud-init

[Bug 1927329] Re: 'snap wait' fails when enabling livepatch

2021-05-13 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
=> Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927329

[Bug 1927029] Re: ua attach command fails

2021-05-12 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Looking at the logs, I am seeing two distinct errors. One is livepatch issue that we have: Failed running command '/snap/bin/canonical-livepatch config remote- server=https://livepatch.canonical.com' [exit(1)]. Message: 2021/05/04 15:18:29 error executing config: Livepatchd error: Couldn't setup

[Bug 1927219] Re: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version

2021-05-12 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for raising this issue. The VERSION file is not missing but we are not using the upstream Makefile to build the source, that's why the version is not set. I fixed this issue and uploaded the fix to my PPA (it might take some minutes to get it published), now if you update the runc package

[Bug 1927219] Re: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version

2021-05-11 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I updated the runc package to version 1.0-rc94 and it is available in this PPA for testing: https://launchpad.net/~lucaskanashiro/+archive/ubuntu/container-stack Let me know if this indeed fix your issue. If yes, I'll update runc in the development release (a.k.a. impish) and then start the SRU

[Bug 1857404] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.18-0ubuntu0.19.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: the installed subprocess of the mysql-server-8.0 package, the post-installation script returned exit statu

2021-05-11 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I just noticed you filed a new bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1927982 I replied to the bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857404 Title:

[Bug 1927982] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2

2021-05-11 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report. The error in the log is the following: Setting up mysql-server-8.0 (8.0.23-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) ... update-alternatives: error: alternative path /etc/mysql/mysql.cnf doesn't exist dpkg: error processing package mysql-server-8.0

[Bug 1928000] Re: open-iscsi fails to upgrade (2.0.874-7.1ubuntu6.2)

2021-05-11 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report and try to make Ubuntu better. The configuration process did hang in this part of the postinst script: # We switched over to modules-load.d logic, so we have to take # care of this in postinst now.

[Bug 1927980] Re: smartd-runner bug causes loss of email recipients

2021-05-11 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug is present in Debian as well and Ubuntu currently does not make any changes to the Debian package. Therefore, this bug would be best fixed directly in Debian, and then Ubuntu will pick up the fix

[Bug 1927219] Re: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version

2021-05-11 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for the investigation! It seems that a bunch of regressions were found in 1.0.0~rc93 as we can see in the 1.0.0~rc94 release notes: "This release fixes several regressions found in v1.0.0-rc93. We recommend users update as soon as possible."

[Bug 1857404] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.18-0ubuntu0.19.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: the installed subprocess of the mysql-server-8.0 package, the post-installation script returned exit statu

2021-05-11 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
@Tanmay, you did not provide some useful information. What are you trying to achieve? What did you do? Did you change any default settings? Without these kind of info we cannot distinguish this from a local config issue or a real bug. Moreover, this should be reported as a separate bug since this

[Bug 1927712] Re: The Pacemaker module "ocf:heartbeat:CTDB" does not work on Bionic

2021-05-11 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Also please keep in mind that the usage of pcs is still not fully supported by the Ubuntu community, we still recommend crmsh: https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/ubuntu-ha-introduction If you want to prepare a package to apply the upstream patch Paride linked I'll be happy to review/sponsor it. For

[Bug 1926819] Re: Empty MOTD on up-to-date systems (includes fix)

2021-05-07 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
https://code.launchpad.net/~lamoura/update-notifier/+git/update- notifier/+merge/402163 ** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura (lamoura) -

[Bug 1927004] Re: [MIR] fence-agents

2021-05-07 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for the review Dan! Some comments below: - I'll make sure the Server team is subscribed to this package. - Regarding the CVE-2019-10153 fix, it is mentioned in the changelog: $ cat debian/changelog | grep -B2 -A4 CVE-2019-10153 fence-agents (4.3.3-2) unstable; urgency=high *

[Bug 1927329] Re: 'snap wait' fails when enabling livepatch

2021-05-06 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Hi Domas, thanks for reporting this issue. Can I ask you which AMI id did you use to launch the image and get this traceback ? I am unable to reproduce it using this AMI: ami-05b0f906c5f1814e7 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1927004] Re: [MIR] fence-agents

2021-05-05 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
FWIW I submitted a pacemaker merge proposal which add changes to recommend fence-agents-supported. Since pacemaker is already in main the fence-agents-supported package will need to be pulled in. https://code.launchpad.net/~lucaskanashiro/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+git/pacemaker/+merge/402284 --

[Bug 1926819] Re: Empty MOTD on up-to-date systems (includes fix)

2021-05-05 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Thank you for raising this. The change was made intentionally to reduce noise to users when there wasn't anything to act upon. We're always keeping an eye out for improving things and will keep this open as we discuss ways we can make things better. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-05-04 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
We have added the verification for Bionic and Focal using the package he have uploaded in the staging ppa: https://launchpad.net/~ua-client/+archive/ubuntu/staging It should contain the same features as the package that is now uploaded to proposed ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic

[Bug 1927029] Re: ua attach command fails

2021-05-04 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Also, can you please provide the livepatch logs by running: sudo snap logs canonical-livepatch.canonical-livepatchd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927029 Title: ua attach command

[Bug 1927029] Re: ua attach command fails

2021-05-04 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Hello Alex, thanks for reporting this bug. If you still have that machine running, can you run: ua enable livepatch And verify if the command works. I have one hypothesis here, but if that enable fails as well, then it cannot be what I am thinking. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-05-04 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
This test failure is expected on all releases after Focal, since we dropped 32-bit i386 support on those releases. Therefore, we are not producing the binary package for i386 on these releases. Because of that, we believe that we can ignore those tests and treat them not as a regression.

[Bug 1926990] Re: update-notifier should not alert users about esm-infra in a ESM machine

2021-05-04 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Description changed: - When running /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check on a ESM machine, we - could alert the user about the existence of both esm-infra and esm-apps - if the system unauthenticated source file for both services. Therefore, - we would display a message like that in the system:

[Bug 1692458] Re: [21.10 FEAT] libvirt: Add support for PCI multifunction adapter hot plug/unplug in libvirt

2021-05-04 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Also affects: libvirt via https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/160 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692458 Title: [21.10

[Bug 1926949] Re: FTBFS: apt can't resolve `dh-systemd | debhelper (>= 13.3)`

2021-05-04 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1927004] [NEW] [MIR] fence-agents

2021-05-03 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Public bug reported: [Availability] fence-agents is present in the Ubuntu archive since Precise, it builds fine and tests pass in all supported architectures. It was promoted in Precise: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/897492 In Trusty it was demoted, not sure about

[Bug 1926990] [NEW] update-notifier should not alert users about esm-infra in a ESM machine

2021-05-03 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Public bug reported: When running /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check on a ESM machine, we could alert the user about the existence of both esm-infra and esm-apps if the system unauthenticated source file for both services. Therefore, we would display a message like that in the system:

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Adding vm tests for bionic. Those tests were executed using the package on this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~ua-client/+archive/ubuntu/staging/ ** Attachment added: "vm-bionic-out"

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Adding the manual for upgrading trusty to xenial, where xenial will have the new package version that is sitting on the proposed pocket. Also, this tests is using the first approach to fix the trusty to xenial upgrade issue regarding the status of esm-infra:

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "gcppro-focal-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493417/+files/gcppro-focal-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "gcppro-bionic-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493416/+files/gcppro-bionic-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "gcppro-xenial-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493415/+files/gcppro-xenial-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Attaching integration test run output on bionic. Note that this was using the ua-client/staging ppa which is the functional equivalent of the proposed release. There is two failures in this log which we have verified is due to a special case because using the same staging ppa that we are testing

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment removed: "gcppro-bionic-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493392/+files/gcppro-bionic-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "gcppro-bionic-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493392/+files/gcppro-bionic-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "gcpgeneric-focal-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493391/+files/gcpgeneric-focal-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "gcpgeneric-bionic-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493390/+files/gcpgeneric-bionic-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "gcpgeneric-xenial-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493388/+files/gcpgeneric-xenial-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "azuregeneric-focal-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493387/+files/azuregeneric-focal-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "azuregeneric-bionic-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493386/+files/azuregeneric-bionic-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "azuregeneric-xenial-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493385/+files/azuregeneric-xenial-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "azurepro-focal-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493384/+files/azurepro-focal-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "azurepro-bionic-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493383/+files/azurepro-bionic-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "azurepro-xenial-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493382/+files/azurepro-xenial-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "awsgeneric-focal-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493381/+files/awsgeneric-focal-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "awsgeneric-bionic-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493380/+files/awsgeneric-bionic-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "awsgeneric-xenial-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493379/+files/awsgeneric-xenial-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "awspro-xenial-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493378/+files/awspro-xenial-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Attachment added: "awspro-bionic-out" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1926361/+attachment/5493377/+files/awspro-bionic-out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1926361] Re: sru ubuntu-advantage-tools (10ubuntu0.16.04.1 -> 27.0) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute

2021-04-29 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
I am now attaching the results of running all the clouds(Azure, AWS, GCP) integration tests for this SRU of uaclient. We have used the package uploaded in this PPA to perform the tests: https://launchpad.net/~ua-client/+archive/ubuntu/staging/ This package should have all the same features as

[Bug 1883315] Re: Showing esm update as installable when esm is disabled

2021-04-28 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
By reusing the same script in this launchpad bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1924766 I can confirm that the xenial, bionic, focal and hirsute proposed packages are working as expected ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic

[Bug 1926208] Re: standard security upgrade counts should not include ESM packages

2021-04-28 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
By reusing the same script in this launchpad bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1924766 I can confirm that the xenial, bionic, focal and hirsute proposed packages are working as expected ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >