You're doing EXACTLY what I was working on ... almost 7 years ago.
Apologies for the completely useless comment, but I burned a lot of time on
this back then.
I feel your pain.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Wow, 5 years just to get a confirmation, that's amazing. Glad I don't
still need it.
If anyone cares, I ditched LVM because of this - one cannot pre-seed
it's config.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
rhythmbox's ipod support has been broken since 11.10.
The last time this worked was 11.04.
Very upsetting that an LTS release makes it out with no functional ipod support
at all.
None of the media managers claiming ipod support work in 12.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you
This should help:
Core was generated by `gtkpod'.
Program terminated with signal 5, Trace/breakpoint trap.
#0 0x7f9a006fef9b in g_logv () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
(gdb) bt
#0 0x7f9a006fef9b in g_logv () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#1
Confirming also.
This renders gtkpod completely unusable as that you can't tell it where to look
for audio files.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/946799
Title:
gtkpod crashes,
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xorg
This is probably not an xorg bug, but I don't know what to file it
against and the ubuntu-bug funneled me here.
THe ATI card fan works OK, in that it is silent after a normal boot,
however when I resume from sleep it stays on at full speed,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787540
Title:
ATI card fan stays on full after resume from suspend
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
4.1 is out soon. OpenSuse 11.4 should have it.
I submitted patches to the upstream Xen build so it builds as-is for
debian/ubuntu filesystems. This should be a simple packaging exercise.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Bart Verwilst b...@verwilst.be wrote:
Any takers for a sync? Please end
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Bart Verwilst b...@verwilst.be wrote:
Debian squeeze has 4.0.1-2 currently. Isn't it possible to just pull
this package into Ubuntu and be done with it? It's been over 1.5 years,
and we're still stuck on 3.3.. Instead of reinventing the wheel ( and
getting
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David 661...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Now I'm bypassing the problem by limiting my network interface's
bandwidth via 'wondershaper'. It takes care, that the transfer speed
from the server to the client is always around 40 Megabytes per second,
which seems to
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: usb-creator
This spec defines my wish better than I could:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Specs/LucidUsbCreatorConsole/
In short, it needs to be able to run on non-GUI systems.
** Affects: usb-creator (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: usb-creator
It would be convenient if one could specify a raw file as the output such that
one could dd this file to a USB stick and then boot from it.
This would make automated updates of servers simpler.
One could gen a custom boot image with
I found that copying my http_proxy setting to https_proxy fixed the
hang.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443404
Title:
add-apt-repository insists on downloading GPG key even if
Bug still exists. I've reported it every way I can.
If there's no activity it doesn't mean it's been fixed by accident, there's
just no new information.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Sorry, wrong bug. This one is a dup.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609230
Title:
install crash
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 558431 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558431
The
d-i partman/early_command string debconf-set partman-auto/disk
$(/cdrom/preseed/nuke-old-lvm.sh)
line belongs in a preseed file.
Here's a few references on preseeding:
David,
You'll have an easier time gathering data if you use something like 'screen' as
a shell wrapper so you can scroll back indefinitely.
Also, regarding the 100Mbit/gigE issue, we did not experience this with
100mBit, but we had all gigE when we upgraded to 9.10, which is when
these problems
Agreed, those screen shots look like a different problem.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Stefan Bader
stefan.ba...@canonical.comwrote:
Hm. I need to read into all the new info tomorrow. Just one thing. The
two screenshots rather hint some harddrive problem. Just a probably
crazy blind
As for more test cases and messages, here are some other bugs that
AFAICT all refer to the same problem:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/561210
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/214041
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/585657
I'd really like to see this backported to lucid since that's the LTS
release we're using on our servers.
Thanks
-Bruce
--
tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I can collaborate the problem reported here. I have the same problem with a
number of servers that were recently migrated to 10.04.
NFS is not stable. frequently, large transfers result in a task blocked for
120 sec message and a dmesg stack trace.
It's utterly incomprehensible to me that
I've tried all of the 10.10 ppa kernel backports as they are made
available. This has made no difference. Each one in turn.
I've also played with the mount lines. Here are some of the combinations
I've tried:
rw,noatime,nfsvers=3,udp,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,actimeo=3,sloppy,addr=135.149.74.51
Machine 1:
0 9:39:31 r...@topaz ~
0 # apt-cache policy nfs-kernel-server
nfs-kernel-server:
Installed: 1:1.2.0-4ubuntu4
Candidate: 1:1.2.0-4ubuntu4
Version table:
*** 1:1.2.0-4ubuntu4 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages
500
Note that this was happening long before we switched to bonded
interfaces.
--
System lock-up when receiving large files (big data amount) from NFS server
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
See this thread for solution:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=10136142#post10136142
--
Microsoft Office LiveMeeting hangs with tiny window
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589524
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I can confirm this. gdb cores work with redhat debian sarge, not not
on ubuntu lucid or meerkat.
--
gcore produces the broken core bt in GDB displays backtrace abnormally.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609666
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Here's a simple test case:
demo.c:
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
int x = 0;
int main(void) {
while(1) {
x++;
printf(X is now %d.\n, x);
}
return(1);
}
% g++ -g3 demo.c -o demo
.
Ctrl-Z
0 % gdb -p `pgrep demo` demo
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-ubuntu
Copyright (C) 2010
Forgot system details:
0 % uname -a
Linux ice 2.6.35-22-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 20:36:48 UTC 2010
i686 GNU/Linux
0 % cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.10
DISTRIB_CODENAME=maverick
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 10.10
--
gcore produces the broken core bt in GDB
Yep, same thing. Current 10.10 i386 desktop installation.
Same problem from firefox chrome (all versions)
--
Microsoft Office LiveMeeting hangs with tiny window
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589524
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Please can we get this in lucid as a backport since it's an LTS release?
--
openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in
Please can we get this in lucid as a backport since it's an LTS release?
--
openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I'll vote for gerry's patch.
--
tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
I'll vote for gerry's patch.
--
tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:26 AM, gerry skerbitz
632...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:
The problem is fixed if we add `-p $CATALINA_PID` to the
start-stop-daemon line in catalina_sh(). Isn't that something we should be
able to rely on?
{{{
*** tomcat6~2010-10-11 13:21:52.0 -0500
---
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:26 AM, gerry skerbitz
632...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:
The problem is fixed if we add `-p $CATALINA_PID` to the
start-stop-daemon line in catalina_sh(). Isn't that something we should be
able to rely on?
{{{
*** tomcat6~2010-10-11 13:21:52.0 -0500
---
Yes, definitely still a problem. The 10.04.1 ISO still has the same
problem.
It's not related to whether the install source is a CD/DVD or USB stick.
I've worked around the problem by adding a:
d-i partman/early_command string debconf-set partman-auto/disk
$(/cdrom/preseed/nuke-old-lvm.sh)
This is still happening in 10.04.1, both with the default Ubuntu server
kernel and with the ppa kernel:
Linux topaz 2.6.35-22-server #33~lucid1-Ubuntu SMP Sat Sep 18 13:29:53
UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Oct 4 09:32:44 topaz kernel: [405000.890225] INFO: task scp:27169 blocked for
more than 120
Medium priority
The flagship server edition hangs on NFS writes is a MEDUIM
priority!!
This has been broken since 10.04 was released and 10.04.1 still has it
and it's MEDIUM prio !???
--
Writing big files to NFS target causes system lock up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561210
You
0 % uname -a
Linux topaz 2.6.32-24-server #43-Ubuntu SMP Thu Sep 16 16:05:42 UTC 2010
x86_64 GNU/Linux
New hardware, new Ubuntu = can't use NFS:
Sep 28 10:12:50 topaz kernel: [604724.768485] SGI XFS with ACLs, security
attributes, realtime, large block/inode numbers, no debug enabled
Sep 28
10.04.1 still has the same problem.
4 months later - critical failure and still unassigned?
What are canonical spending all their time on, eye candy? Come on people, this
is a core failure. This is very bad. There are dozens of the same report that
are all unassigned, with one a medium.
Even with the above suggestions, I still get this on any site that
attempts to read my java config, eg:
http://www.java.com/en/download/help/testvm.xml
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: testvm2.Main.class
at
sun.plugin2.applet.Applet2ClassLoader.findClass(Applet2ClassLoader.java:219)
You're right. I just changed from using a proxy .pac file to an explicit
proxy addr in the java control panel and it works now.
So, java does not work with proxy pac files!!!
Maybe this little bit will save someone else the weeks I've spent on
this.
--
[Lucid] sun-java6-plugin not recognized
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Thierry Carrez
thierry.car...@ubuntu.comwrote:
I agree that we should not force tomcat6 to run under a user that has no
bash running.
Note that the proposed patch breaks use of AUTHBIND. This should rather
be fixed by shipping once and for all the catalina.sh
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Thierry Carrez
thierry.car...@ubuntu.comwrote:
I agree that we should not force tomcat6 to run under a user that has no
bash running.
Note that the proposed patch breaks use of AUTHBIND. This should rather
be fixed by shipping once and for all the catalina.sh
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tomcat6
While it's not recommended to run tomcat as root, there are
circumstances that make it a necessity, like embedded systems. (IMHO
Linux should not enforce policy at this level)
Anyway, setting the following in /etc/default/tomcat6
** Patch added: This is a fix that does not alter the behavior in any way, but
fixes ths problem.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554/+attachment/1554204/+files/tomcat6-init.patch
--
tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554
You
Left debug info in patch...sorry. New patch attached.
** Patch added: Patch - without debug info and correct offsets this time.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat6/+bug/632554/+attachment/1555462/+files/tomcat6-init.patch
--
tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tomcat6
While it's not recommended to run tomcat as root, there are
circumstances that make it a necessity, like embedded systems. (IMHO
Linux should not enforce policy at this level)
Anyway, setting the following in /etc/default/tomcat6
** Patch added: This is a fix that does not alter the behavior in any way, but
fixes ths problem.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554/+attachment/1554204/+files/tomcat6-init.patch
--
tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554
You
Left debug info in patch...sorry. New patch attached.
** Patch added: Patch - without debug info and correct offsets this time.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat6/+bug/632554/+attachment/1555462/+files/tomcat6-init.patch
--
tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already
I can add more to this.
It happens when there is an existing LVM scheme that needs to be deleted
and I'm using a preseed config for lvm. Here's the logs form the
installer:
Aug 26 15:38:35 debconf: -- METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description
Aug 26 15:38:35 debconf: -- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s)
I should also suggest that the affected package be changed to partman,
if that's an option.
--
install crash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609230
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Still broken.
I'm attaching the lvm partitioning recipe that is present on disk that
causes the installer to crash.
Note, I have an ISO that uses this recipe and as such is a complete test
case. If you would like the iso to test, please let me know where to
upload it.
** Attachment added:
A simple script to delete the partitions called form the arly_command
string should work, eg:
d-i partman/early_command string debconf-set partman-auto/disk
$(/cdrom/preseed/seed-disk.sh)
/cdrom/preseed/seed-disk.sh:
lvps=$(lvs |cut -d' ' -f 3 | grep -v LV)
for lv in $lvps ; do
I installed the debug packages and started a plug/unplug cycle to get it
to happen and saw iphone-set-info is segfaulting:
2010-08-10 08:58:12 usb 1-7 USB disconnect, address 15
2010-08-10 08:58:12 usb 1-7 new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and
address 16
2010-08-10 08:58:12
Public bug reported:
Here's the htop output showing iphone-set-info spinning at 99% CPU.
622 root 18 -2 50496 3340 2168 R 99.0 0.1 22h17:18 /lib/udev
/iphone-set-info
This happens a lot and whenever I feel my machine is sluggish I check
for this and kill it.
0 # uname -a
Linux ice
** Tags added: kernel nfs panic
--
INFO: task nfsd:5047 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606523
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Here's another tail from /var/log/syslog during the install.
Jul 25 06:31:01 debconf: -- PROGRESS INFO partman/progress/init/biosgrub
Jul 25 06:31:01 debconf: -- 10 partman/progress/init/biosgrub does not exist
Jul 25 06:31:01 debconf: -- PROGRESS INFO partman/progress/init/fallback
Jul 25
The driver was being loaded in the initrd. Blacklisting the module and
rebuilding the initrd fixed this.
** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
ATTR{class} rules in /etc/udev/rules.d/ no longer work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606524
You received this bug notification
Appears to be related to overlay'd IP addresses. With the clientaddr
specified, this has not happened since.
Adding clientaddr=135.149.75.130 may have fixed this.
tonic:/home on /import/tonic type nfs
Attaching the partman log.
** Attachment added: Log file from the installer's partitioner.
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52489926/partman.log
--
preseed LVM partition recipe broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433092
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
No love,
Linux tonic 2.6.35-9-server #14~lucid1-Ubuntu SMP Sun Jul 18 22:44:45 UTC 2010
x86_64 GNU/Linux
has the same problem:
Jul 22 08:43:10 tonic kernel: [55920.730905] nfsd D 0001005482f1
0 4452 2 0x
Jul 22 08:43:10 tonic kernel: [55920.730909]
This kernel still has the same problem:
linux-image-2.6.35-8-server 2.6.35-8.13~lucid1
Jul 21 11:59:38 tonic kernel: [415800.840069] INFO: task nfsd:2880 blocked for
more than 120 seconds.
Jul 21 11:59:38 tonic kernel: [415800.840073] echo 0
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs
Where do the patch files come from?
I don't see
where fsimage-zfs-24.patch1 blktap2_ctrl_func.patch-xen-testing-4.x.patch1
are retrieved.
-Bruce
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Boris Derzhavets 378...@bugs.launchpad.net
wrote:
Adding “VHD ZFS 24″ support to Xen 4.0.*.rc* source kernels
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Boris Derzhavets 378...@bugs.launchpad.net
wrote:
I've just upload both patches . They have been submitted to xen-devel at
different time. I was unable to find link for VHD's one. Link to Mark
Johnson's patch may be googled in 5 minutes. VHD's one only for
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Boris Derzhavets
378...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
In your output:-
-
patching file debian/patches-4.0.1rc1/series
patching file debian/patches-4.0.1rc1/grub2-fix.patch
patching
Public bug reported:
This is triggered by high volume NFS traffic. This box has 3 fibre channel
volumes that are exported over NFS.
I started with a 10.04 linux-server kernel, which died regularly at least once
a day.
I started upgrading to try the ppa kernels and the frequency has decreased
** Attachment added: bug.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52054421/bug.log
--
INFO: task nfsd:5047 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606523
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: udev
I have a rule that worked fine in jaunty:
/etc/udev/rules.d/20-fc_hba.rule:
ACTION==add, ATTR{class}==0x0c0400, PROGRAM=fc_hba.py, RESULT==skip,
OPTIONS+=ignore_device, OPTIONS+=last_rule
The fc_hba.py script returned skip unless the system was
** Attachment added: lspci.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52054596/lspci.log
--
ATTR{class} rules in /etc/udev/rules.d/ no longer work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606524
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I found a blog posting that expresses my sentiments on Lucid's udev
exactly:
http://shallowsky.com/blog/linux/kernel/lucid-udev.html
This is good enough to quote.
I love how if you give the udevadm info arguments in the wrong order, -p -a, it
means something else and gives an error message.
I
Patch works for me too.
Was failing without it.
My .config is attached.
** Attachment added: Kernel .config that causes this problem
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51939005/.config
--
Won't compile if build is remote called (wrong path setting in
ubuntu/omnibook/Makefile)
Pin it back to Jaunty...groan.
Package: slapd
Pin: version 2.4.15-1ubuntu3
Pin-Priority: 1100
Package: ldap-utils
Pin: version 2.4.15-1ubuntu3
Pin-Priority: 1100
Package: libldap-2.4-2
Pin: version 2.4.15-1ubuntu3
Pin-Priority: 1100
-Bruce
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM,
Pin it back to Jaunty...groan.
Package: slapd
Pin: version 2.4.15-1ubuntu3
Pin-Priority: 1100
Package: ldap-utils
Pin: version 2.4.15-1ubuntu3
Pin-Priority: 1100
Package: libldap-2.4-2
Pin: version 2.4.15-1ubuntu3
Pin-Priority: 1100
-Bruce
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM,
A preseeded install that tries to wipe existing lvm partitions has the
same problem:
Jun 23 17:00:52 debconf: -- FGET partman-lvm/device_remove_lvm seen
Jun 23 17:00:52 debconf: -- 0 true
Jun 23 17:00:52 debconf: -- GET partman-lvm/device_remove_lvm
Jun 23 17:00:52 debconf: -- 0 true
Jun 23
I'm seeing the same thing 10.04 64 bit.
[773760.910061] INFO: task tar:14596 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[773760.926430] echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables
this message.
[773760.958906] tar D 0 14596 14568 0x0004
[773760.958912]
Here's a Xen boot config generator for /etc/grub.d so you don't have to
manually create a 40-xen each time.
-Bruce
===cut===
#!/bin/bash -e
#===
#
# FILE: 09_xen
#
# USAGE: update-grub ... with this in
Can someone change this from wishlist to something more likely to get
fixed?
--
openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap
Can someone change this from wishlist to something more likely to get
fixed?
--
openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
What is the functional state of openldap-dit? (https://launchpad.net
/openldap-dit/)
It hasn't seen any activity since 2009-12-02 and there are no milestones
and no available downloads. The trunk show last modified 20 weeks ago.
Is it functional, or the early stages of work in progress? The
What is the functional state of openldap-dit? (https://launchpad.net
/openldap-dit/)
It hasn't seen any activity since 2009-12-02 and there are no milestones
and no available downloads. The trunk show last modified 20 weeks ago.
Is it functional, or the early stages of work in progress? The
Here's a workaround.
Add yourself as a local user in /etc/passwd /etc/shadow and it'll work.
To confirm, run
getent passwd | grep your uid
and you should see 2 entries, the local and the ldap. If they are ==,
then you did the right thing.
bedge:x:1077::Bruce
Just curious, how can this be Importance: High and unassigned with an
LTS release just around the corner?
LDAP appears to be a second class citizen to Canonical. See bug 442498 (
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/442498 )
--
thunderbird shredder always segfaults on startup
Apologies in advance for the useless rant, but whose idea was it to
strip out the default ldap config?
I second the comments of everyone here that laments the time when slapd just
worked.
The cn=config change was difficult to swallow, but in the interest of progress,
OK, fine. This release
Just to get a feel for the state here, is there currently any work done
at all for this slapd-dit package?
Why is this marked as Won't fix? Is Ubuntu planning a new LTS release
with no LDAP? That'll go over well. Has anyone in canonocal mgmt even
seen this? Or is it a nasty little surprise
Apologies in advance for the useless rant, but whose idea was it to
strip out the default ldap config?
I second the comments of everyone here that laments the time when slapd just
worked.
The cn=config change was difficult to swallow, but in the interest of progress,
OK, fine. This release
Just to get a feel for the state here, is there currently any work done
at all for this slapd-dit package?
Why is this marked as Won't fix? Is Ubuntu planning a new LTS release
with no LDAP? That'll go over well. Has anyone in canonocal mgmt even
seen this? Or is it a nasty little surprise
I'd like to bump the priority on this as it makes it impossible for
servers to come up clean.
For an LTS release, I would expect that having servers boot clean would
be a priority.
--
portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does
not work properly
Gets worse if you add SAN volumes that are NFS exported.
There's a corner case here that's not working at all:
1 - QLogic SAN - Fails to come up until I reload qla driver with modprobe
-r/modprobe
2 - NFS export, since #1 didn't come up, export also fails.
3 - Since #2 didn't come up, autofs
Gets worse if you add SAN volumes that are NFS exported.
There's a corner case here that's not working at all:
1 - QLogic SAN - Fails to come up until I reload qla driver with modprobe
-r/modprobe
2 - NFS export, since #1 didn't come up, export also fails.
3 - Since #2 didn't come up, autofs
I'd like to bump the priority on this as it makes it impossible for
servers to come up clean.
For an LTS release, I would expect that having servers boot clean would
be a priority.
--
portmap is not started during boot process before autofs and hence autofs does
not work properly
Nice!!
Thanks for the info.
This is a strong argument for getting this into 10.4. No other distro has a
pre-packages Xen dom0 with a kernel from this century, let alone with nvidia
drivers working.
The last LTS release had dom0 support so this one should too. (IMHO)
-Bruce
On Fri, Mar 26,
I can confirm this.
I can't get any regexp to work, even simple string, with and without quotes. I
even RTFM'd but the FM gives no info on the regexp syntax.
ii kompare
4:4.3.95-0ubuntu1~karmic1~ppa1 file difference
viewer for KDE 4
--
Use regular expressions in
...here's the stdout after a failed diff because there's a non-null
ignore regexp:
kompare(26884)/kompare (libs) KomparePart::cleanUpTemporaryFiles: Cleaning
temporary files.
kompare(26884)/kompare (nav view) KompareNavTreePart::slotModelsChanged: Models
( 0x0 ) have changed... scanning the
Confirmed on lucid beta 1 386 with:
t...@tv:~$ aplay -l
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 0: VT1708B Analog [VT1708B Analog]
Subdevices: 2/2
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
Subdevice #1: subdevice #1
card 0: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 1: VT1708B
We have been successfully using a xen hypervisor 4.0.0-rc3 build on Ubuntu
9.10.
I would think that packaging either this version or 3.4.x as an interim xen
server release for Ubuntu would be a desirable option as it would provide a
viable migration pack from 8.04 Xen servers.
-Bruce
On Fri, Mar
Any update on this?
Is this fixed in 9.10, or 10.4?
--
preseed LVM partition recipe broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433092
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Just a followup. Still no problems since switching to nvidia-*-195 5 days ago.
This went from multiple times a day to zero in 5 days.
I hesitate to close it as the -180 is still the current ubuntu released
version.
--
X server crashes with Saw signal 11. Server aborting
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: thunderbird
If nsswitch.conf is set with:
passwd: compat ldap
group: compat ldap
shadow: compat ldap
My ldap config does work as I'm using it for login authentication.
thunderbird-3.0 always segfaults:
0 % thunderbird-3.0
Upgraded to nvidia-*-195 yesterday.
No problems since. Work pattern unchanged, same workload, no issues.
Unless I see it again, I'm blaming this on the nvidia-*-185 driver.
--
X server crashes with Saw signal 11. Server aborting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506069
You received this bug
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
