François is right: you repo requires an authentication.
So, check your settings in term of user/password.
Regards
JB
On 02/26/2018 03:06 AM, François Papon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Your repository mvnrepo:8080 required an authentication (401). Are you using
> the
> same repository when you build on
Hi,
Your repository mvnrepo:8080 required an authentication (401). Are you using
the same repository when you build on local ? May be your old job is ok because
the artefacts already are in the workspace of Jenkins.
Francois
Le 25 févr. 2018 23:50, Ryan Moquin a écrit :
>
> Has anyone had any
One way I handled this in the past (though I'm not overly fond of the
solution since it relied on AWS, but it would be interesting if there was a
generic way to achieve it), was to use AWS KMS and role based
authentication. This way the instance could decrypt it's password from the
ec2 instance it
If trimming was performed by default on tproperties, wouldn't that place a
little extra performance overhead into OSGi vs developers just making sure
there isn't trailing whitespace if they don't want it? It wouldn't be
much, but it adds up...
Ryan
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:52 PM Leschke, Scott
When building a karaf distribution, I have my main features xml defined in
runtime scope but non of the features as installed or boot features. This
results in the features xml file being copied to the system repository of
the distribution. This is handy since I can skip the feature:repo-add
comm
Are there any examples anywhere for using the karaf-maven-plugin run and
client goals? I noticed the documentation doesn't have those sections
populated, so I was hoping maybe there was an example somewhere :)
Thanks for any help!
Ryan
Has anyone had any weird issues with the karaf-maven-plugin having issues
pulling the framework features xml when building a distribution? After
switching to 4.1.5, our jenkins build fails due to a 401 trying to retrieve
the 4.1.5 features xml when building a distribution. If I change the
version
O, duh. I knew I had saw a Karaf feature that had the other spring
versions in it. That explains a lot. I remember seeing that legacy one in
the past, my bad. Thanks for clarifying!
Ryan
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 10:12 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Yes, that's why you need spring-l