On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Sven Köhler wrote:
> With the integration of UML into the Linux-Kernel i thought, that it would
> speed up development of UML and make it more stable. Intead, the people still
> break the UML-stuff regularly and Jeff and Blaisorblade must provide patches
> again :-(
That's true
On Monday 07 February 2005 04:56 am, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Sven Köhler wrote:
> > With the integration of UML into the Linux-Kernel i thought, that it
> > would speed up development of UML and make it more stable. Intead, the
> > people still break the UML-stuff regularly
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 19:20, Hannes Schulz wrote:
> I was reading hostfs_* because I wanted hostfs as rootfs (when
> launched by root).
> --- uml-2.4.22um5-orig/arch/um/fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c 2003-09-23
> 15:21:33.0 +0200
> +++ uml-2.4.22um5-hwh1/arch/um/fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c 200
On Friday 04 February 2005 20:38, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> The stack randomization patches that went into 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 broke
> compilation of ARCH=um. This patch fixes compiling by adding
> arch_align_stack back in.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-By: Jeff Dike <[EMA
Andrew Morton, this is another couple of fixes for UML to go in before 2.6.11
release. The first is *really* trivial, the second is very important since it
fixes a security problem (described in the changelog).
For the previous ones, I've seen they were merged quickly.
Thanks and regards
--
Pao
From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Descend into arch/um/kernel/skas/util during make clean.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.11-paolo/arch/um/kernel/skas/Makefile |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff -puN arch/um
From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Frank 'xraz' Fricke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Frank Fricke reported that hostfs does not verify that a chmod +s, for
instance, is done by a sufficiently privileged user, as long as the UML kernel
itself can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I've the doubt that the addition would better go under sys-i386 or
> some other subarch-dependent directories (in a file compiled against
> kernelspace headers, i.e. not listed in USER_OBJS in the directory
> it's contained inside), and it'd be nice to add also the x86_
