Re: [libreoffice-users] Preventing the display of #VALUE! in a spreadsheet

2015-06-21 Thread pete nikolic
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 21:52:53 +0100 Brian Barker wrote: > At 21:11 21/06/2015 +0100, Pete Nikolic wrote: > >At 19:31 21/06/2015 +0100, Pete Nikolic wrote: > >>I am running Libre office Version 4.3.7.2 on Arch Linux. I have a > >>lot of cells with this or similar i

Re: [libreoffice-users] Preventing the display of #VALUE! in a spreadsheet

2015-06-21 Thread pete nikolic
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 20:05:33 +0100 Brian Barker wrote: > At 19:31 21/06/2015 +0100, Pete Nikolic wrote: > >I am running Libre office Version 4.3.7.2 on Arch Linux. I have a > >lot of cells with this or similar in > >=IF(D10-K10>0,D10-K10,"") > >the probl

[libreoffice-users] Preventing the display of #VALUE! in a spreadsheet

2015-06-21 Thread pete nikolic
Hi All .. Having a problem here that is becoming a real PITA situation . I am running Libre office Version 4.3.7.2 on Arch Linux I have a lot of cells with this or similar in =IF(D10-K10>0,D10-K10,"") the problem is that if either D10 or K10 is blank the result is displayed as #VALUE! tha

Re: [libreoffice-users] selecting cells in calc sheet

2015-04-24 Thread pete nikolic
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:52:47 +0100 Brian Barker wrote: > At 21:00 24/04/2015 +0100, Pete Nikolic wrote: > >I need to be able to select the last 3 in a series of cells that > >change on a weekly basis so in > >week 1: there would be 1 cell - no action > >week 2: 2 cel

[libreoffice-users] selecting cells in calc sheet

2015-04-24 Thread pete nikolic
Hi Folks .. I need to be able to select the last 3 in a series of cells that change on a weekly basis so i week 1 there would be 1 cell no action week 2 2 cells no action week 3 3 cell sum three cells week 4

Re: [libreoffice-users] Using LO Writer to edit HTML

2014-11-16 Thread pete nikolic
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 18:00:23 -0600 anne-ology wrote: >I so agree. > > > > From: Virgil Arrington > Date: Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 7:44 AM > Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Using LO Writer to edit HTML > To: users@global.libreoffice.org > > > On 11/14/2014 9:55 PM, Tom Davies wrote: >

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Nitpicking on a name

2014-07-28 Thread pete nikolic
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:33:24 +0700 "Urmas" wrote: > A lout known as "Charles-H. Schulz": > > > As for the feature parity with Word 2.0, we have obviously passed that > stage before OpenOffice.org 1.0; > > And yet it was not until 4.3, not yet released BTW your suit got support for > paragraphs

Re: Request for review: (Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: crash - crash - crash - crash. !@#$#@!)

2014-05-04 Thread pete nikolic
On Sun, 4 May 2014 09:40:36 -0400 Jim Seymour wrote: > On Sat, 03 May 2014 13:12:47 -0600 > Tom Cloyd wrote: > > > Re: status of forum participant "Urmas" - > > > > I've examined the past 3 months' posts by this individual - > > approximately 25% of them are slams of LO software or insults to

Re: [libreoffice-users] List-reply issues... again

2014-04-27 Thread pete nikolic
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 18:09:37 +0200 Paul wrote: > I know this list reply issue has cropped up several times now, but just > to add something I haven't seen mentioned: > > I'm using Claws Mail 3.7.6 on Windows 7 64bit. When replying to > messages from this list, there are normally four options: >

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: CONVERTING A MICROSOFT TEMPLATE TO BE USED WITH LIBRE OFFICE

2014-04-27 Thread pete nikolic
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 11:36:36 +0200 Italo Vignoli wrote: > On 26/04/14 17:12, Urmas wrote: > > > StarOffice 5.2 was released in 1998. If that is 'ancient' for you, you > > are an idiot that should be kept out from developing office software. > > Insulting other mailing list subscribers is absolu

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: CONVERTING A MICROSOFT TEMPLATE TO BE USED WITH LIBRE OFFICE

2014-04-27 Thread pete nikolic
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 22:12:58 +0700 "Urmas" wrote: > "James Knott": > > > IIRC, the formats that are no longer supported > are the ancient StarOffice ones. > > StarOffice 5.2 was released in 1998. If that is 'ancient' for you, you are > an idiot that should be kept out from developing office s

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: CONVERTING A MICROSOFT TEMPLATE TO BE USED WITH LIBRE OFFICE

2014-04-22 Thread pete nikolic
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:03:50 -0400 James Knott wrote: > Urmas wrote: > > Meanwhile, Libreoffice cannot open its own documents from 2001. > > Yeah, that really a problem, especially since LO didn't exist back then. > > +1 Pete . -- Linux 7-of-9 3.14.1-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 14 20:4

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: CONVERTING A MICROSOFT TEMPLATE TO BE USED WITH LIBRE OFFICE

2014-04-22 Thread pete nikolic
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:06:14 +0700 "Urmas" wrote: > "anne-ology" >MSFT has been/is making their system(s) incompatible with others in > order to reap a higher profit-margin ;-( > > For the last 23 years Microsoft Office has changed its format TWICE. > Meanwhile, Libreoffice cannot open

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO compatibility

2014-03-15 Thread pete nikolic
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 03:25:43 -0700 (PDT) Pedro wrote: > nabbler wrote > > Please go to m$ and ask if m$office is compatible with the ODF standard of > > LO > > THAT is exactly the problem! There should never be an "ODF standard of LO". > > If OASIS (the organization that defines the ODF standar

Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc worksheet stalls when opening

2014-03-12 Thread pete nikolic
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 22:25:32 -0400 Alan B wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:21 PM, William Drago > wrote: > > > > > I have a spreadsheet that stalls when I try to open it and when I try to > > save it. It does eventually open after a very long time. I > > > > Just looking for confirmation the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: --convert-to issue

2014-03-10 Thread pete nikolic
On Sun, 9 Mar 2014 14:35:50 +0700 "Urmas" wrote: > "e-letter": > > filenames with undesirable characters (e.g. m$ > people adding spaces, strokes (/, \) etc.) > > Spaces are not 'undesirable characters.' \ and / are both invalid filename > characters in Windows. > All your contribution to this

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: --convert-to issue

2014-03-10 Thread pete nikolic
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:55:12 + e-letter wrote: > On 09/03/2014, Urmas wrote: > > "e-letter": > > > > filenames with undesirable characters (e.g. m$ > > people adding spaces, strokes (/, \) etc.) > > > > Spaces are not 'undesirable characters.' \ and / are both invalid filename > > characters

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: The Document Foundation's response to Her Majesty's Government...

2014-03-04 Thread pete nikolic
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:31:06 +0700 "Urmas" wrote: > "Tom Davies": > > Do you think ODF stands a chance with its incompatible changes between 1.0 > and 1.1, or formulas fiasco? > Or the lack of documentation and a heap of undocumented extensions AOO/LO > uses? > > > > Still being paid by M$

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: low traffic lately?

2014-02-05 Thread pete nikolic
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:37:52 + Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) > Such attitude is dying out. > > Modern devices almost entirely force people into top-posting and > almost all people new to mailing-lists will have no idea about the > possibility of doing anything other than top-posting. Some allow

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: low traffic lately?

2014-02-03 Thread pete nikolic
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 05:33:24 + Brian Barker wrote: > At 09:58 04/02/2014 +1000, Peter West wrote: > >It mystifies me that some ossers become tossers on this particular topic, ... > > Whatever value your argument might have had, you destroy it by being > abusive and using an ad hominem argum

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: low traffic lately?

2014-01-26 Thread pete nikolic
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:07:02 -0600 anne-ology wrote: >as for me, I don't even know what AskLO is - >and probably don't want to know if it's similar to Facebook, > Google, et.al. >because I too don't want all the additional spam ... >or the minute-by-minute

[libreoffice-users] Lo Impress very slow with audio

2014-01-20 Thread pete nikolic
Hi .. I am having problems with Impress working on an presentation for our clubs annual awards night a couple of slides need backing music with them . when i insert the sound files (ogg format) it takes around 2 minutes to load if i remove the sound file it is almost instant System Arch L