On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 17:57 -0400, webmaster for Kracked Press
Productions wrote:
> On 04/24/2011 02:21 PM, Twayne wrote:
> > The OP here sounds like no more than sour grapes to me based on his mostly
> > wanting a free copy of MSO. LiberOffice is new and is NOT meant to simply
> > replace MS Off
On 04/24/2011 02:21 PM, Twayne wrote:
The OP here sounds like no more than sour grapes to me based on his mostly
wanting a free copy of MSO. LiberOffice is new and is NOT meant to simply
replace MS Office.
I call LibreOffice an alternative to MSO, not a direct replacement.
Just like laptops are
The OP here sounds like no more than sour grapes to me based on his mostly
wanting a free copy of MSO. LiberOffice is new and is NOT meant to simply
replace MS Office. There also seems to be a lot of pressure albeit indirect,
to dispense with OO and LO meaning a myopic view of the world of offic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/04/2011 07:30, e-letter wrote:
> to use LO but finds that there is (minor?) loss of formatting (e.g. a
> table width greater than the body text margin), then writes to LO
> mailing list to complain that LO writer is not good enough for their
I'
>> A business that receives profits from customers that demand to use M$
>software should simply pay the licences to meet their customers'
>demands and consider it a cost of doing business.
>
>I can't tell which of the following statements you mean:
>* If a company is Microsoft only, it should pay
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:51:05PM +0100, e-letter wrote:
> The continual request to make LO more compatible with M$ office is a
> strategic mistake.
>
> A business that cannot afford M$ software licences for the benefit of
> that business' customers does not deserve to be in existence.
That let'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/04/2011 12:35, e-letter wrote:
> The point is, the business user receives a document in m$ word, is not
prepared to pay for m$ office
You are assuming that microsoft offers a product for the platform used
by the business. That is no longer a s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/04/2011 11:51, e-letter wrote:
> A business that receives profits from customers that demand to use M$
software should simply pay the licences to meet their customers'
demands and consider it a cost of doing business.
I can't tell which of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/04/2011 18:10, t...@iafrica.com wrote:
> Someone please show me LibO can communicate with all basic MS packages i.e
> Word, Excel and PP.
LibO is as compatible with MSO file formats are as MSO is compatible
with MSO. Furthermore,depending upo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 21/04/11 11:06 PM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote:
>
> That is the real issue. If all users dump the formats MSO created
> for 2007, and beyond, saving their documents in .doc, .xlt, etc.,
> then their would be no issue with compa
Hello
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 13:35 +0100, e-letter wrote:
> The point is, the business user receives a document in m$ word, is not
> prepared to pay for m$ office and so _chooses_ to use LO, then
> complains that LO is "incompatible" (never that m$o is incompatible
> with LO! Or ODF!).
>
> When
On 04/21/2011 08:35 AM, e-letter wrote:
The point is, the business user receives a document in m$ word, is not
prepared to pay for m$ office and so _chooses_ to use LO, then
complains that LO is "incompatible" (never that m$o is incompatible
with LO! Or ODF!).
The only issue I see is with MSO'
To: users
Sent: Thu, 21 April, 2011 13:35:41
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice VS MS Office
The point is, the business user receives a document in m$ word, is not
prepared to pay for m$ office and so _chooses_ to use LO, then
complains that LO is "incompatible" (never that
The point is, the business user receives a document in m$ word, is not
prepared to pay for m$ office and so _chooses_ to use LO, then
complains that LO is "incompatible" (never that m$o is incompatible
with LO! Or ODF!).
When a business user (who hopefully has made a donation to the FOSS
community
bject: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice VS MS Office
The continual request to make LO more compatible with M$ office is a
strategic mistake.
A business that cannot afford M$ software licences for the benefit of
that business' customers does not deserve to be in existence. A
business that receiv
The continual request to make LO more compatible with M$ office is a
strategic mistake.
A business that cannot afford M$ software licences for the benefit of
that business' customers does not deserve to be in existence. A
business that receives profits from customers that demand to use M$
software
Hi Glenn,
No I had no idea about MS Office future potential for liquidation
It scares me even more!... This is LibO's chance to blow MS away BUT ONLY
IF IT's
COMPATIBLE..
Someone plse show me LibO can communicate with all basic MS packages i.e Word,
Excel
and PP.
Then combined w
17 matches
Mail list logo
