Hi everyone!
I find a problem when we create two or more instances on one host at the
same time,we meet the error device onebr alreay exists can't create bridge
with the same name.
The reason is that instances all try to create their bridge,although they
check whether or not their
Hi Bendix,
Any reason of using OpenNebula 3.2, lot of bugs have been fixed in newer
version. I recommend you to upgrade to the lastest one OpenNebula 4.4
Cheers
On 10 December 2013 15:06, Bendix Harries bendix_harr...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
i set up opennebula several times now, but for some
Hi,
I don't really get your scenario, could you elaborate it a bit more?
Cheers
On 10 December 2013 12:42, Alexandr telecastcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear list!
I want to solve the following problem. I need to make two instances are
sunstone one FN - sunstone for example, one password and one
On 12/11/2013 01:38 PM, Daniel Molina wrote:
Hi,
I don't really get your scenario, could you elaborate it a bit more?
is it possible to install two sunstone instances on a single front-end?
Cheers
On 10 December 2013 12:42, Alexandr telecastcl...@gmail.com
mailto:telecastcl...@gmail.com
On 11 December 2013 12:02, Alexandr telecastcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/11/2013 01:38 PM, Daniel Molina wrote:
Hi,
I don't really get your scenario, could you elaborate it a bit more?
is it possible to install two sunstone instances on a single front-end?
You cannot start more than
Thank you for your answer
I'm getting
No host with enough capacity to deploy the VM
Is this cpu, memory, cache capacity being the problem?
I have no capacity problem creating an image using qemu-img and kvm creating
the server using iso file outside the Opennebula on the same server.
Googling
Hi,
What does /var/log/one/sched.conf say? Maybe you don't have any host with
enough capacity because hosts are filtered out for some reason.
Regards.
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org |
Could you check if there is any errors in the browser console? and could
you send us your sunstone-server.conf
Cheers
On 10 December 2013 20:35, Giovanni Ponti giovanni.po...@enea.it wrote:
I backupped oned.conf and correctly update it after upgrading.
Database updating process was also
Hello,
I am using ceph with opennebula.
I have created a 100gb disk image and I do not understand if it is thin or
thick.
I hope I can have thin provision.
Thanks,
Mario
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
Hello,
I have created a 100gb image on ceph.
My system datastore have few gb free.
But image is on ceph so it should not check system datastore free space!
I will never have a lot of space on system datastore!
Thanks,
Mario
___
Users mailing list
Hi,
Could you paste the contents of the /var/log/one/sched.log file?
It should have the amount of space that the VM needs for the system and
image datastores.
Regards.
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org |
Hello Tino,
Yes, I have a bridge_list with this datastore.
And yes, the datastore seems to be successfully monitored
Wed Dec 11 13:06:15 2013 [ImM][D]: Datastore default (1) successfully monitored.
Here are the output of the show command
DATASTORE
ID1/ID
UID0/UID
GID0/GID
We are running ON version 3.8.1 and are not able to create VMs.
The instantiation fails in different places, but here's an example of one that
hangs in BOOT status:
Tue Dec 10 22:36:13 2013 [DiM][I]: New VM state is ACTIVE.
Tue Dec 10 22:36:13 2013 [LCM][I]: New VM state is PROLOG.
Tue Dec 10
This can be caused by several things.
* There are already 15 actions being done by the VMM. By default the
drivers are only allowed to execute 15 actions at the same time and
the next actions are enqueued. Have you launched a batch of actions to
lots of VMs?
* There is already an action being
Hi Javier,
Thank you for your reply!
After read this blog http://blog.opennebula.org/?p=3473 I started to
concern some settings of my system. The test (a demo/show for my
testing organization management team) I performed was that 20 VMs were
initiated as a batch. We have 4 hosts as computing
Hello,
On a ONE 4.2, we just encountered an transiant issue:
[InM][I]: Monitoring host grichka (9)
[InM][I]: Command execution fail: 'if [ -x /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes ];
then /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm 9 grichka; else exit 42; fi'
[InM][I]: error: failed to get domain
Hi Eduardo,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Eduardo Roloff rol...@gmail.com wrote:
BASE_PATH/var/lib/one/datastores/1/BASE_PATH
That's probably the reason why the DS is not getting properly
monitored. The BASE_PATH needs to point to /vmfs/volumes, you can set
it at DS creation time by
Hi,
That's not looking good, the VM should not go to UNKNOWN after the
snapshot...
What is the output of virsh while the VM is in unknown?
Regards.
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org |
Tino,
But I have the same configuration with datastore 0 and it works.
Also I set the BASE_PATH in the template after the creation (they are
the default datastores).
BASE_PATH![CDATA[/vmfs/volumes]]/BASE_PATH
Here is the output for the show command of the datastore 0
DATASTORE
ID0/ID
Hi,
the VM after is correctly running. But my question is: it's normal that
the snapshot take 48 minutes and not 21 seconds as indicated in snapshot
view?
Il 11/12/2013 16:17, Carlos Martín Sánchez ha scritto:
Hi,
That's not looking good, the VM should not go to UNKNOWN after the
Hi Neelaya,
that's actually a good question. Yes, you need to be able to ssh to the
same host.
cheers,
Jaime
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Neelaya Dhatchayani neels.v...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Jaime,
Thanks. My doubt is if my frontend is installed in a host called
onedaemon, should
Hi Neelaya,
can you please send us the whole vm template? onevm show 9
cheers,
Jaime
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Hi,
OpenNebula 4.4 which has been just released has deprectated iSCSI. The main
reason is that the tgt iSCSI daemon is not very flexible and we recommend
using other storage mechanisms instead.
OpenNebula 3.6.0 should be definitetly upgraded to newer versions.
Regarding your specific problem,
Hi Mario,
yes, the problem is that the datastore space reported by Ceph is the
aggregate of all the pools, you can't ask for the available space of a
specific pool, as far as I know.
Happy to hear it worked in the end.
Cheers,
Jaime
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Mario Giammarco
Hi,
yes, this is a known bug which is already solved in OpenNebula = 4.0 by
implementing locking mechanisms.
http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/1722
cheers,
Jaime
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:46 AM, cmcc.dylan dx10ye...@126.com wrote:
Hi everyone!
I find a problem when we create two or
Here are some parts of the log, please note that I tried two things:
- clean some requirements of the vm (datastore rank stripping);
- adding another system datastore (I have one shared and one ssh);
- please also note that system datastore with id 0 was never used because
it was not part of the
Dear Jaime (and the OpenNebula Community members),
Thanks for your reply.
I will upgrade to OpenNebula 3.8.1/5 to see how it will go.
1) when run oneimage show 0, it should have below output:
..
SOURCE: iqn.2013-12.iSCSIHost:192.168.1.7.vg-one.lv-one-13
PATH: /var/lib/images/win-xp.qcow2
Hi,
Can you elaborate more on what you want to achieve?
If you
have a 100GB image and it is set to persistent, you can instantiate that
image immediately and deploy/live migrate it to any nebula node. Only
one running instance of VM of this image is allowed.
If it is a 100GB
non
Hi,Jainme.
I think curruent codes don't have solved the bug complelely. The key problems
the the following snippets are executed parallel.
class OpenNebulaHM OpenNebulaNetwork
XPATH_FILTER = TEMPLATE/NIC[VLAN='YES']
def initialize(vm, deploy_id = nil, hypervisor = nil)
29 matches
Mail list logo