Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to someone else):
And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them.
I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply.
Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list?
It does have a
Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to someone else):
And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them.
I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply.
Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list?
Reply-To
Matthias Leisi wrote:
Reply-To considered harmful: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
And still considered harmful:
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html
Yeah, well, Considered Harmful essays are also considered harmful:
Alex Woick writes:
Just recently backscatter starts to hit me very bad, and I found out
that bounces generated by qmail are not detected by the vbounce plugin.
Here is such a backscatter mail:
http://pastebin.com/m346c7979
: jm 5...; ./spamassassin -D -Lt /home/jm/DL/m346c7979.txt
...
Kelson wrote:
Yeah, well, Considered Harmful essays are also considered harmful:
http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html
It was inevitable that the format would be used on itself.
Let's remember that these essays are matters of individual opinion, not
statements of indisputable truth
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net
is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't match.
Any ideas?
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from [75.145.201.209]
(75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jason Bertoch wrote:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net
is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't match.
Any ideas?
Did you restart spamd?
You might try just
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL
Hey list,
I get lots of these errors while passing a mbox file to sa-learn for
spam learning:
Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuation byte 0x72,
immediately after start byte 0xf3) in transliteration (tr///) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message.pm line
-Original Message-
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jason Bertoch wrote:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net
is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't
match.
Any ideas?
Did you restart spamd?
You might
Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to someone else):
And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them.
On 09.06.08 09:45, Joseph Brennan wrote:
I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply.
Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to
Joseph Brennan wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to someone else):
And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them.
I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply.
so what? I don't know for you, but it takes me more time to
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 09:45 -0400, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to someone else):
And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them.
ACK.
I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply.
Please change to a
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:55 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Kelson wrote:
Yeah, well, Considered Harmful essays are also considered harmful:
http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html
It was inevitable that the format would be used on itself.
Of course. People should use more on itself - a lot
I just got this mail through, with only BAYES_99 hit:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_99=4.5]
Very strange, I have a LOT of SARE and other rules, can't remember that
this ever happened before. The filters seem to work otherwise, no other
spam passed
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jason Bertoch wrote:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net
is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't match.
Any ideas?
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from [75.145.201.209]
15 matches
Mail list logo