Re: Re: Re: Basic JUnit Test

2012-08-19 Thread JCoder
Hi Vineet, thanks for the reply. The line "tester.getServletRequest().setParameter("myParam", "testParam");" But now Im breaking my head with the next issue. If you look at my first post, Im trying to do a test where a second page is rendered after a submit on an AjaxButton. The test code looks

Re: Should I really go for LoadableDetachableModel ?

2012-08-19 Thread kshitiz
Hi, Thank you for clarifying me. Removing the reference can help me out. Let me try it :) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Should-I-really-go-for-LoadableDetachableModel-tp4651353p4651359.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.c

Re: Add page feedback to every AjaxRequestTarget

2012-08-19 Thread Alec Swan
The main problem I am facing is that in Wicket 1.4.x I can't figure out how to access ART from the component that was not added to this ART, e.g. during ajax form submission. I tried to add AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to every Form child of the page but that overrode those form ajax-submit functionalit

Re: Should I really go for LoadableDetachableModel ?

2012-08-19 Thread Martin Sachs
Hi, yes the listDataProvider doesnt help for minimize memory usage. The DataProvider will be stored in Component and therefore all fields are also stored in component/session. For e.g. 2000 Session you have 2000 times the same list in memory. This is not what you want. First optimization: Cach

Re: Should I really go for LoadableDetachableModel ?

2012-08-19 Thread kshitiz
Hi, Thanks for the reply. I am trying t achieve what you suggested me. But one thing I want to ask. In listDataProvider, you will anyway provide list of data to get rendered. You may render it in any manner but that list will be stored as final or class variable. Wont that take up the session ? I

Re: wicket multi-window app

2012-08-19 Thread Chuck Brinkman
Martin, Thanks for your input. Chuck From Chuck's iPad iPad: (502) 713-3283 On Aug 18, 2012, at 7:06 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > Writing web apps requires writing JavaScript code ... > Even if you use components like Wicket-extensions' ModalWindow or > wicket-bootstrap's Modal, or

Re: Should I really go for LoadableDetachableModel ?

2012-08-19 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Probably better to use a DataView with a dataprovider for populating the list. The dataprovider has a way to create a model for each item. In that you can use a LDM for just populating one item. The dataview will only populate the dataprovider for rendering. For actions the individual LDM will be u

Should I really go for LoadableDetachableModel ?

2012-08-19 Thread kshitiz
Hi, Please help me out here. In my web app, I have to show a list of data. Previously I was using simple arraylist in listview. To deal with any memory concern in future, I moved from arraylist to loadabledetachablemodal list. But now, in any operation like delete, update etc, whole list is being