It is correct both in theory and in practice, so please don't limit
the items per call!
On 22/10/2009, at 20.33, Ivan Damgård wrote:
I have not been following the discussion in detail, but it's true that
the more items you request, the smaller the amortized cost, at least
in theory. I also th
I have not been following the discussion in detail, but it's true that
the more items you request, the smaller the amortized cost, at least
in theory. I also think it would be a very good idea to involve
either Jesper
or Claudio in this, if there is any place where you are in doubt at all.
reg
Correct!
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Marcel Keller wrote:
> Hi Janus,
>
> I remember you saying today that the preprocessing in the OrlandiRuntime is
> more efficient per item the more items are requested. Is that correct? I ask
> because in my optimizations, I limited the items being prepr
Hi Janus,
I remember you saying today that the preprocessing in the OrlandiRuntime
is more efficient per item the more items are requested. Is that
correct? I ask because in my optimizations, I limited the items being
preprocessed per call in order to save memory. I would of course drop
that