It is correct both in theory and in practice, so please don't limit
the items per call!
On 22/10/2009, at 20.33, Ivan Damgård wrote:
I have not been following the discussion in detail, but it's true that
the more items you request, the smaller the amortized cost, at least
in theory. I also think it would be a very good idea to involve
either Jesper
or Claudio in this, if there is any place where you are in doubt at
all.
regards, Ivan
On 22/10/2009, at 20.17, Marcel Keller wrote:
Hi Janus,
I remember you saying today that the preprocessing in the
OrlandiRuntime is more efficient per item the more items are
requested. Is that correct? I ask because in my optimizations, I
limited the items being preprocessed per call in order to save
memory. I would of course drop that because it doesn't really
affect the other cases.
Best regards,
Marcel
_______________________________________________
viff-devel mailing list (http://viff.dk/)
viff-devel@viff.dk
http://lists.viff.dk/listinfo.cgi/viff-devel-viff.dk
____________________________________________________
Janus Dam Nielsen
Research and Innovationspecialist, PhD.
CENTRE FOR IT-SECURITY
THE ALEXANDRA INSTITUTE LTD.
T +45 42 22 93 56
E janus.niel...@alexandra.dk
W alexandra.dk
____________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
viff-devel mailing list (http://viff.dk/)
viff-devel@viff.dk
http://lists.viff.dk/listinfo.cgi/viff-devel-viff.dk
