From: Charles E Campbell Jr, May 25, 2006 9:52 AM
> Steve Hall wrote:
>
> > Just assume all paths are Windows-hostile unless passed through
> > such a wrapper. (I never see these errors on *nix, so I assume
> > it's path related.)
>
> I'll try it! The unfortunate part is, I can't test it. Or rath
Steve Hall wrote:
Just assume all paths are Windows-hostile unless passed through such a
wrapper. (I never see these errors on *nix, so I assume it's path
related.)
I'll try it! The unfortunate part is, I can't test it. Or rather, I
can test to see if the wrapper introduces some
new prob
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 12:04 -0400, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
> A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> > Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
> > >
> > > I've had several folks having a problem with WinXP and netrw.
> > > The problems seem to involve temporary files during attempts to
> > > use ftp; since temporary fil
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
Hello, Tony!
I've had several folks having a problem with WinXP and netrw. The
problems seem to involve temporary files during attempts to use ftp;
since temporary filenames are produced by tempname(), they're o/s
dependent. Admittedly w
Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
Hello, Tony!
I've had several folks having a problem with WinXP and netrw. The
problems seem to involve temporary files during attempts to use ftp;
since temporary filenames are produced by tempname(), they're o/s
dependent. Admittedly without having searched th