I sure hope that biological warfare is outlawed by every species that inhabits
the universe. Surely peace can be achieved at some point in our future.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wed, Oct 24, 2012 11:38 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Aliens Favour Romney
In repl
Call me an optimist if you will, but I assume that we will be capable of
traveling at effectively greater than light speed some day. I understand that
current theories (SR) prohibit this, but they also prohibit LENR. Some ideas
concerning worm holes, among others, are being kicked around that
Dear Abd,
Some people are focused on Truth, some on Value.
Mark is interested in Value- he wants CF/LENR to be useful, to do something
good- give energy to the people.
Your premises being different there is difficult to arrive at compatible
views.
However if CF generates Value, than it is implicit
Well, Mr. Gibbs, while I appreciate your
reporting on Defkalion, you continue to confuse
and conflate two separate issues.
1. The reality of cold fusion as a physical phenomenon.
2. The existence of practical applications.
The kind of information you request below is
entirely focused, in term
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:36:32 -0400:
Hi Jed,
[snip]
>That is because they don't believe you. You have the same problem as people
>writing Nigerian e-mail scam letters.
>
>- Jed
I suspect you are correct, but how do I overcome this?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:09:27 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>It is a little difficult to imagine how we might pay for this kind of
>"trade." How could this be a commercial transaction in any sense?
Obviously the only system that would work is barter. IOW payment in kind.
BTW
"Up" in the business sense.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/10/rossi-leonardo-corp-will-not-be-the-same/
Jeff
wrote:
>
> There's a nice little SciFi short story about this (sorry, can't remember
> title
> or author). The basic theme is that trade is in concepts rather than
> objects,
> since these are readily exchanged, and of value to many.
>
Exactly. Concepts, and the templates for replicators. (Repli
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:57:27 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
>
>
>> "The remainder of this paper is, or will be, or has been, depending on the
>> reader's inertial frame, divided into three sections."
>>
>
>That's wonderful.
>
>Still, I can't think of a
Jones Beene wrote:
> Defkalion has been burdened with poor management, too few qualified
> scientists . . .
I do not know how many scientists they have.
> - and a flawed business plan. Dumber than dumb. Their business
> plan envisioned charging extremely high up-front license fees for every
Hello Dave,
I wish you the best in your new campaign tests with borax. Please, keep us
up to date with discoveries and challenges you will have to face.
Arnaud
_
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: mercredi 24 octobre 2012 02:54
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re
wrote:
>
> "Nothing motivates people more than the prospect of making billions of
> dollars."
>
> ...you'd be surprised how wrong that is. I have pointed out to people that
> the
> market is on the order of trillions, with an initial investment of only an
> hour
> or so to look at what I've got,
I'm pretty happy at vortex. ;)
Eric
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 24, 2012, at 11:30, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Well, you can get your fill here at her home port:
>
> http://www.moletrap.co.uk/forum/
>
> where she seems to be irritating her cohorts.
Good old dark matter/energy. You know it is working when your device
malfunctions.
Stewart
Darkmattersalot.com
On Wednesday, October 24, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jones Beene
> >
> wrote:
>
> > True, even Celani is not yet
> > independently replicated, at l
It's just a "DETACHMENT event". Let's hope them to find something
interresting after the ongoing calibration.
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: mercredi 24 octobre 2012 20:27
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:More leaked (?) info fr
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> I think we have been a little unfair to Mary. I have never minded her
> complaints. She does not lack for enthusiasm and focus.
Well, you can get your fill here at her home port:
http://www.moletrap.co.uk/forum/
where she seems to be irr
Jed sez:
...
> Despite his foibles, I really like Andrea Rossi. He annoys the heck out of
> me. He is infuriating! And yet, somehow, you can't help but like him. He is
> such a character. A force of nature! Like the guy in the beer ad: he is the
> most interesting man in the world.
>
> If he succ
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> True, even Celani is not yet
> independently replicated, at least not on the record, but insiders think the
> first replication will be published soon.
It looks like HUG might have experienced a "LENR event".
http://www.quantumheat.org/inde
I wrote:
I am not sure what to call the software image you put into a replicator.
> Design? Blueprint? Genome?
>
Template?
Clarke described replicators in "Profiles" (1963). He called the
instructions the "matrix" or "memory."
The ones we have now are only the beginning of the technology.
Clar
Rossi wrote:
> Leonardo Corp. will not be the same from the next week. I am in the USA,
> where an inportant event has been born from the last tests.
> Warm Regards,
> A.R.
>
Oh boy. Here we go again.
Despite his foibles, I really like Andrea Rossi. He annoys the heck out of
me. He is infuriat
Popsci :
If history is any guide, no such report would be issued. Rossi will reset
the goalpoststhe only thing he does with any consistencyand forestall
his day of reckoning for another few months, and then another few months
after that, until finally he disappears from the stage in a puff of
Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
> "The remainder of this paper is, or will be, or has been, depending on the
> reader's inertial frame, divided into three sections."
>
That's wonderful.
Still, I can't think of any reason for interstellar trade. If you can
travel between stars you can also send a complet
-Original Message-
From: Robert Lynn
I can only surmise that Defkalion prevented publication, which would
contradict their earlier statements about allowing independent
testers
to publish. Hiding poor results?
Yes - I think they are hiding results, but "poor" in
Robert Lynn wrote:
So if they funded the trip then why didn't they publish any results?
>
Because they are under NDAs.
- Jed
24 matches
Mail list logo
