-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Lynn
I can only surmise that Defkalion prevented publication, which would
contradict their earlier statements about allowing independent
testers
to publish. Hiding poor results?Yes - I think they are hiding results, but "poor" in this context, is a bit like "beauty" since it is "in the eye of the beholder"... at least in one sense. In short, they could be hiding decent results. Defkalion has been burdened with poor management, too few qualified scientists - and a flawed business plan. Dumber than dumb. Their business plan envisioned charging extremely high up-front license fees for every country. This is/was idiotic without very strong results indicating "ready for market"... Not to mention the dishonesty of their past claims, such as the Xanthi fiasco. Thus, when it comes to managerial expectation, a COP of less than 3 would completely ruin their former business plan - which looks already dead in the water to everyone else. They thought they could salvage some of that plan, perhaps, with a modest COP over 3, and maybe they had hints of this level at times. But since they are in dire circumstances now - they cannot even afford the move to Canada due to almost all of their investors "going south" so to speak, they had to resort to shoddy practices - once again. But think about this: those who are in it for the science, and many of us here on vortex, see things differently to the extent that a PROVED result of far lower COP- say it was 200 watts-in on average, and say 300 watts out, on average, for a COP of half of what they claim - WOW - this would be true beauty - phenomenal, state-of-the-art really, at least when proved, and replicated by others! At this point in time - when you look at what seems to be defensible proof of operation of any LENR device over 10 watts, for far longer than chemical energy would permit- what is really out-there that one can point to? Celani only. In short, if we demand the kind of proof that professionals like those at N.I. can give, with open replications in progress - then Rossi is out, no proof - likewise Brillouin, Piantelli, the Toyota consortium and the rest are out - so there is really only Celani. True, even Celani is not yet independently replicated, at least not on the record, but insiders think the first replication will be published soon. It is possible DGT "could have" already achieved more than Celani ... but less than what they need to sell absurd licenses. And a DGT with good management should have been proud to present more modest results, if they had it. But yes, if what they can prove is COP of 1.5 (guess) then for them it would be - not just poor results, but a complete deal-breaker, if you are trying to sell a license to someone for $50 million. Jones
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
