Bob,
Your question concerning the measured atmospheric pressure when the fluid
output was reading 102 C remained on my mind last night. That did seem curious
when it appeared that the vapor and liquid combination should be in equilibrium.
My first thought was that perhaps a measurement error d
David Roberson wrote:
Where did the pressure of 15.75 psi abs come from? I thought the pressure
> of the 102C dry steam (assumed) was 1 atmos.--not 15.75 abs.
> I think your assumed conditions above 1 atmos. were never measured.
>
Rossi reported the pressure was 0.0 bar, which Murray took t
Jed,
According to the reference I have found water vapor and liquid water remain in
combination at a pressure of 15.7902 psi absolute when subject to 102 C. Since
you and others appear to believe that most of the mass of water going to the
customer equipment is liquid then that would likely be
Yes, thanks Mark, that is what I was trying to say. Like Casimir cavities they
change the vacuum density such that space time between the boundaries is
modified and IMHO the lower ground states they speak of are actually
relativistic in nature but in a negative way , the world outside the cavit
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-23-2016-alain-coetmeur-about-lenr.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Hmmm. I wonder if filling the EMdrive with hydrogen would affect the thrust?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
Axil, I agree [snip] By looking for a hydrogen BEC in cavities, a researcher
could find the ideal dimensions of the Nano cavity that produces the condensed
hydrogen and engineer a material that produces this ultra-dense hydrogen
crystal in abundance.[/snip]
I also think we should emulate their
It might have some unexpected results – if the EM drive is based on the same
segregation of vacuum density AND I don’t know that it is or not, there is
also the question of where the segregation occurs for hydrogen to be affected
and whether it would mostly cancel out wrt thrust as there is lik
I posted it in the Wiki. Maybe someone will try it. Suggestion #16:
http://emdrive.wiki/List_of_Suggested_Experiments
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Roarty, Francis X <
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote:
> It might have some unexpected results – if the EM drive is based on the
> same segregat
Dave--
The steam table indicates a condition of equilibrium between the liquid phase
and the gaseous phase of water. If the conditions are 1 bar at a temperature
above the 99.9743 there is no liquid phase in equilibrium with the steam (gas)
phase. The gas is phase is at 102 degrees and is
Apparently the ERV measured 102.8 C @ atmospheric pressure. That is dry
steam.
That implies the customer used steam at a negative pressure.
On 8/23/2016 8:50 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
Dave--
The steam table indicates a condition of equilibrium between the
liquid phase and the gaseous phase of w
Bob,
I would agree with your assessment that the steam is dry if we can be ensured
that there is a moisture separator in the proper location. Have you seen any
evidence that this is true? If the steam is totally dry then Rossi's system is
probably working much as he states.
My approach is to
As I have stated, if the steam is truly dry then plenty of power is being
supplied to the customer. If the ERV is mistaken that the steam is dry then
I.H. is likely correct.
If everyone accepts that the true pressure of the steam is atmospheric while
the temperature is 102.8 C then it is dry.
On 08/24/2016 12:03 AM, David Roberson wrote:
As I have stated, if the steam is truly dry then plenty of power is
being supplied to the customer. If the ERV is mistaken that the steam
is dry then I.H. is likely correct.
If everyone accepts that the true pressure of the steam is atmospheric
14 matches
Mail list logo